Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Anyone interested in D2500CC benchmarking?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    12 Posts 6 Posters 4.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Nice. You can't have enough real world numbers.
      What power supply are you using?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pvoigt
        last edited by

        Nice board - some time ago I took into account as well but finally decided for a Jetway NF99FL-525. Do you run a full install or a nanobsd image?

        Peter

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          tirsojrp
          last edited by

          @stephenw10:

          Nice. You can't have enough real world numbers.
          What power supply are you using?

          Steve

          I want to know about that PSU too.

          Probably the SSD helps to keep it down.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            MMacD
            last edited by

            Very.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              edentel
              last edited by

              Sorry was off on other projects and letting it settle in.  I went with the picoPSU-80 power supply at Minibox. The whole thing with SSD fits nicely into the M350 case they have.  That is all mounted in my structured cabling panel out in the garage.  So far no fan needed.  We'll see as 100+ summer comes around next year.

              Right now I'm running the full install.  It was nice to play with that for a change rather than the nano I had run on my Alix.

              So far I'm very pleased with it.  I need to tweak Snort still and see what happens with throughput if I play with the memory settings and additional rule sets.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                tirsojrp
                last edited by

                I think the right question was: Are you using a PicoPSU?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  edentel
                  last edited by

                  Yep.  I went with the picoPSU-80 power supply from Minibox.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • valnarV
                    valnar
                    last edited by

                    Now…is there anything more modern on the Atom front that uses less electricity for similar performance?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      edentel
                      last edited by

                      There is the million dollar question.  From my few days of research I couldn't find anything the had more performance with less power and in that form factor.  I've seen things about Intels forthcoming NUC platform but that is still months off.  Oh and don't forget price….

                      Board - $96
                      Case & power - $69
                      Memory - $18
                      60G SSD - $29 after rebate

                      So $212 all in not too bad!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        The netbook atoms have better power saving features but are harder to find in a desktop board. There are also some more exotic atoms that are even rarer, such as that in the Intel phone.
                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors
                        pfSense currently only supports x86 otherwise there are ARM platforms that fit the bill.
                        At these sort of power levels the CPU is often not the biggest consumer on the board. The early atoms had a power hungry chipset, the most recent are much better. Using more ram than you need uses power.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          tirsojrp
                          last edited by

                          @valnar:

                          Now…is there anything more modern on the Atom front that uses less electricity for similar performance?

                          Yes, but they are either hard to find or expensive, sometimes both.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.