Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Supermicro Atom box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    3 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bob76535
      last edited by

      I need to replace my firewall at the co-lo. The switch that feeds my existing pfsense box shorted out and took the box with it. I am considering buying one of these to replace it:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101364

      It has the D525 dual core atom and will have 4G of DDR3 ram and a decent HDD.

      I have a 100M connection and it usually sits at about 18-20M with 60M bursts during the day. I have 24 Windoze servers (all with static public IPs) hiding behind pfsense in transparent bridge mode (release 1.2.3). There is no NAT, no VPN, no DHCP, just some WAN rules to keep the unwanted crap out. I have experimented with SNORT but it isn't a necessity. Based on the hardware sizing chart this server should be ok. In reality can anyone here tell me if they think it will be ok before I buy it?

      Thanks

      Bob

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        Davec
        last edited by

        Dear Bob76535,

        It should be ok, my box also run the same chassis and atom board (2G ram) with 100M connection. We use the transparent mode with snort packages. Average traffic is 30-40M and burst to 60M in the peak hours. With the luck in the past 20 months, we do not have issues on the traffic issues (1.2.3RC3). We now plan to switch to (2.0 RC3).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          asterix
          last edited by

          If you are planning to increase that WAN connection from 100Mb and adding packages like snort or squid sometime in near future than I would recommend you have a second look at i3 CPUs. Atoms are powerful enough for decent throughput but handling routing for large number of users with increased bandwidth might just be a bit too much for it. Plus the max you can go on Atoms for now is 4GB RAM. It sounds a lot for now but as technology is changing rapidly 4GB might just be a low end config mid next year.. who knows.. just guessing.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.