2.0.2 ???
-
So are the builds dated 20121126 (http://files.nyi.pfsense.org/jimp/foo/shiny/ehrmagerd/) the final official 2.0.2?
-
Unless one of the following happens:
- We find a showstopper bug during testing
- Someone releases yet another security advisory
- Aliens invade and destroy all copies of the images so we have to build new ones.
My money's on 3.
-
Then what happens Jim ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Well once we have defeated the alien invasion, we just provision a new set of builders and make a fresh set. Easy peasy.
-
Unless one of the following happens:
- We find a showstopper bug during testing
- Someone releases yet another security advisory
- Aliens invade and destroy all copies of the images so we have to build new ones.
My money's on 3.
So you are saying that I should download the images now before the aliens find the location of the hosting server. ;)
Starting download! -
-
And they will be on the official DL page/mirrors SOOOOOOON???? :D
-
See above, re: 1-3.
Still have some testing to do, but so far, so good… the more people that test it, the better. (Including installing from CD, Memstick, NanoBSD, etc, etc).
-
They're already here, and in high definition! Noooooo.
Steve
-
See above, re: 1-3.
Still have some testing to do, but so far, so good… the more people that test it, the better. (Including installing from CD, Memstick, NanoBSD, etc, etc).
Installing the nanobsd upgrade on my Alix at home.
It says it's not digitally signed, is that normal? -
Does anyone know if the issue below made it into the forthcoming 2.0.2 release? The snort alerts and blocked tabs just bring up a blank screen for me after about 2 months of uptime.
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1942
Snort has no relevance to a release. It's a package. Keep it in the package forum.
-
See above, re: 1-3.
Still have some testing to do, but so far, so good… the more people that test it, the better. (Including installing from CD, Memstick, NanoBSD, etc, etc).
Installing the nanobsd upgrade on my Alix at home.
It says it's not digitally signed, is that normal?Yes that's normal we only digitally sign the release images once we've deemed them to actually be the official release.
-
Yes that's normal we only digitally sign the release images once we've deemed them to actually be the official release.
Thanks, the upgrade just completed succesfully.
-
Just for info:
- upgraded from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 a couple of Alix
- same upgrade on 2 VM
- installed a new 2.0.2 VM from .ova (VMware ESXi5) and restored full config from 2.0.1
All has been properly updated.
-
All looking good on a few boxes I have upgraded. the only odd thing I see is that the text for the dynamically generated fields on the dashboard seem to be too small compared to the rest of the text on the page. This wasn't as visible in 2.0.1. Perhaps make them a font size bigger or make them the same font as the rest of the elements on the page?
I know its just a cosmetic issue, but they just look out of place to me.
Other than that things work great!
-J
-
@Jon:
All looking good on a few boxes I have upgraded. the only odd thing I see is that the text for the dynamically generated fields on the dashboard seem to be too small compared to the rest of the text on the page. This wasn't as visible in 2.0.1. Perhaps make them a font size bigger or make them the same font as the rest of the elements on the page?
Can confirm this font issue. Just upgraded a VirtualBox test VM from 2.0.1 using http://files.nyi.pfsense.org/jimp/foo/shiny/ehrmagerd/pfSense-Full-Update-2.0.2-RELEASE-amd64-20121126-1712.tgz.
All the rest is working fine so far :). Great work! Nevertheless, I will be waiting for the official 2.0.2 release before I'm going to upgrade my production machines.
-
I like beeing on official signes releases as well in production :)
-
Something that cosmetic/nitpicky won't be worth rolling a new release for… If it's still an issue on 2.1 we'll fix it there. :-)
(Considering there are other Dashboard bugs that are also being left in, that's pretty minor.) -
Is there a widescreen option in 2.1 when it comes or has that been implemented in 2.0.2 as well?
-
No, the widescreen package is not compatible with 2.1 yet. Unless someone steps up to fix it, I'm not sure if it will be. It's not one we ever officially supported, it just happened to work and a lot of people liked it. It may not work with 2.0.2 either since it replaces the menu and thus would have the wrong link to ntp and maybe other stuff.
