Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtual IP alias as gateway for a subnet

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    26 Posts 3 Posters 11.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      If you are seeing that capture on the WAN interface, then NAT isn't happening.

      Make sure the gateway is selected on the WAN interface
      Make sure outbound NAT is set to automatic
      Then reset the state table again

      If it still doesn't work, switch to manual outbound NAT and make your own rules.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mmerlone
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        If you are seeing that capture on the WAN interface, then NAT isn't happening.

        Good to learn.

        @jimp:

        Make sure the gateway is selected on the WAN interface
        Make sure outbound NAT is set to automatic
        Then reset the state table again

        All done.

        @jimp:

        If it still doesn't work, ….

        Still doesn't work. Why is that? Could some other advanced option interfere? As I said at first, I did not mess anything, started over with default config. Is there any option other than automatic outbound NAT to check?

        @jimp:

        … switch to manual outbound NAT and make your own rules.

        Can you point me some RTFM or assist me? The attached setup did not work, also tried a few variations.

        Side info: I also have a NAT'ed ADSL interface, but no matter which gateway I set as default (WAN or ADSL) the problem persists. No interface has the option to block bogon networks checked.

        2012-12-20_15-48-07.png
        2012-12-20_15-48-07.png_thumb

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          You didn't disable the firewall under System > Advanced, did you? (That would also disable the ability to do NAT…)

          Switch back to automatic outbound NAT, save/apply, and then get a copy of /tmp/rules.debug and copy/paste it here.

          The NAT rule you had looked right, that should have been working from what I could see.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mmerlone
            last edited by

            @jimp:

            You didn't disable the firewall under System > Advanced, did you? (That would also disable the ability to do NAT…)

            Nope.

            @jimp:

            Switch back to automatic outbound NAT, save/apply, and then get a copy of /tmp/rules.debug and copy/paste it here.

            #System aliases
            
            loopback = "{ lo0 }"
            WAN = "{ xl0 }"
            LAN = "{ bge1 }"
            ADSL = "{ bge0 }"
            
            #SSH Lockout Table
            table <sshlockout>persist
            table <webconfiguratorlockout>persist
            #Snort tables
            table <snort2c>table <virusprot># User Aliases 
            table <lanvisitantes>{   10.0.0.0/24 } 
            LanVisitantes = "<lanvisitantes>"
            
            # Gateways
            GWGWADSL = " route-to ( bge0 192.168.1.100 ) "
            GWGWWAN = " route-to ( xl0 x.x.x.153 ) "
            GWGWLANNS100 = " route-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 ) "
            GWGWLANRV042 = " route-to ( bge1 192.168.0.251 ) "
            GWGW_Group = "  route-to { ( bge0 192.168.1.100 )  }  "
            
            set loginterface bge1
            set optimization normal
            set limit states 96000
            set limit src-nodes 96000
            
            set skip on pfsync0
            
            scrub in on $WAN all    fragment reassemble
            scrub in on $LAN all    fragment reassemble
            scrub in on $ADSL all    fragment reassemble
            
            no nat proto carp
            no rdr proto carp
            nat-anchor "natearly/*"
            nat-anchor "natrules/*"
            
            # Outbound NAT rules
            
            # Subnets to NAT 
            
            # Load balancing anchor
            rdr-anchor "relayd/*"
            # TFTP proxy
            rdr-anchor "tftp-proxy/*"
            table <negate_networks>{ x.x.x.152/29 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 }
            # UPnPd rdr anchor
            rdr-anchor "miniupnpd"
            
            anchor "relayd/*"
            #---------------------------------------------------------------------------
            # default deny rules
            #---------------------------------------------------------------------------
            block in log all label "Default deny rule"
            block out log all label "Default deny rule"
            
            # We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.
            block quick proto { tcp, udp } from any port = 0 to any
            block quick proto { tcp, udp } from any to any port = 0
            
            # Block all IPv6
            block in quick inet6 all
            block out quick inet6 all
            
            # Snort package
            block quick from <snort2c>to any label "Block snort2c hosts"
            block quick from any to <snort2c>label "Block snort2c hosts"
            block in log quick proto carp from (self) to any
            pass quick proto carp
            pass quick proto pfsync
            
            # SSH lockout
            block in log quick proto tcp from <sshlockout>to any port 22 label "sshlockout"
            
            # webConfigurator lockout
            block in log quick proto tcp from <webconfiguratorlockout>to any port 80 label "webConfiguratorlockout"
            block in quick from <virusprot>to any label "virusprot overload table"
            antispoof for xl0
            antispoof for bge1
            antispoof for bge0
            
            # loopback
            pass in on $loopback all label "pass loopback"
            pass out on $loopback all label "pass loopback"
            # let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic
            pass out all keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            pass out route-to ( xl0 x.x.x.153 ) from x.x.x.154 to !x.x.x.152/29 keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            pass out route-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 ) from 192.168.0.252 to !192.168.0.0/24 keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            pass out route-to ( bge0 192.168.1.100 ) from 192.168.1.101 to !192.168.1.0/24 keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            # make sure the user cannot lock himself out of the webConfigurator or SSH
            pass in quick on bge1 proto tcp from any to (bge1) port { 80 22 } keep state label "anti-lockout rule"
            
            # User-defined rules follow
            
            anchor "userrules/*"
            pass  on {  xl0  bge1  bge0  }  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            pass  in  quick  on $WAN reply-to ( xl0 x.x.x.153 )  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            pass  in  quick  on $LAN reply-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 )  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            pass  in  quick  on $LAN reply-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 )  from 192.168.0.0/24 to any keep state  label "USER_RULE: Default allow LAN to any rule"
            pass  in  quick  on $LAN reply-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 )  from   $LanVisitantes to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            pass  in  quick  on $LAN reply-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 )  from any to   $LanVisitantes keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            pass  in  quick  on $ADSL reply-to ( bge0 192.168.1.100 )  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
            
            # VPN Rules
            anchor "tftp-proxy/*"</virusprot></webconfiguratorlockout></sshlockout></snort2c></snort2c></negate_networks></lanvisitantes></lanvisitantes></virusprot></snort2c></webconfiguratorlockout></sshlockout> 
            

            @jimp:

            The NAT rule you had looked right, that should have been working from what I could see.

            Oh, God. I'll leave on vacation in 54 minutes anyway. :) Would be so happy if I could make it work this year….

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              Hmm there are no NAT rules in that file at all.

              The only way that can happen on Automatic Outbound NAT is if the firewall doesn't know there is a WAN, meaning Interfaces > WAN has no gateway selected from the drop-down on that page.

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                mmerlone
                last edited by

                @jimp:

                The only way that can happen on Automatic Outbound NAT is if the firewall doesn't know there is a WAN, meaning Interfaces > WAN has no gateway selected from the drop-down on that page.

                Seems there is another way…. see attached WAN does have a gateway selected.

                2012-12-20_16-11-51.png
                2012-12-20_16-11-51.png_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Ah, well there is one more I forgot - if the LAN interface does have a gateway set, it would think that the LAN is a WAN so it wouldn't do NAT.

                  You don't need nor want to have a gateway set on the LAN interface, and if you have a gateway defined that is actually your LAN IP, remove it.

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    mmerlone
                    last edited by

                    @jimp:

                    Ah, well there is one more I forgot - if the LAN interface does have a gateway set, it would think that the LAN is a WAN so it wouldn't do NAT.

                    Makes total sense, it did have a gateway set.

                    @jimp:

                    You don't need nor want to have a gateway set on the LAN interface, and if you have a gateway defined that is actually your LAN IP, remove it.

                    Sure, sure. Selected 'none' as gateway for LAN interface, reset states, rebooted pfsense and …. (still rebooting) .... nope! No luck, no echo reply from 8.8.8.8 to 10.0.0.8. Partial success though: my workstation on 192.168.0.0/24 does ping 8.8.8.8 and am using it now to post to the forum :)

                    What the heck! Let me reboot 10.0.0.8 and see what happens, it is a Win XP anyway and my workstation is linux. Rebooted and no luck yet. Dont' forget 10.0.0.8 uses 10.0.0.5 as default gateway, which is a VIP Alias on pfsense.

                    States and packet capture on WAN interface attached.

                    
                    16:34:10.530106 IP 10.0.0.8 > 8.8.8.8: ICMP echo request, id 512, seq 9216, length 40
                    16:34:16.030458 IP 10.0.0.8 > 8.8.8.8: ICMP echo request, id 512, seq 9472, length 40
                    16:34:21.532543 IP 10.0.0.8 > 8.8.8.8: ICMP echo request, id 512, seq 9728, length 40
                    
                    

                    2012-12-20_16-31-56.png
                    2012-12-20_16-31-56.png_thumb

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      mmerlone
                      last edited by

                      Forgot to mention: also deselected a gateway for ADSL interface, just to be sure.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        So it's still not getting NAT, do you see nat rules in /tmp/rules.debug now?

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          @mmerlone:

                          Forgot to mention: also deselected a gateway for ADSL interface, just to be sure.

                          Why?

                          WANs must have a gateway set.
                          LANs must not have a gateway set.

                          Otherwise automatic outbound NAT will not work.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            mmerlone
                            last edited by

                            @jimp:

                            So it's still not getting NAT, do you see nat rules in /tmp/rules.debug now?

                            Not yet (oops, regarding 10.0.0.0/24):

                            #System aliases
                            
                            loopback = "{ lo0 }"
                            WAN = "{ xl0 }"
                            LAN = "{ bge1 }"
                            ADSL = "{ bge0 }"
                            
                            #SSH Lockout Table
                            table <sshlockout>persist
                            table <webconfiguratorlockout>persist
                            #Snort tables
                            table <snort2c>table <virusprot># User Aliases 
                            table <lanvisitantes>{   10.0.0.0/24 } 
                            LanVisitantes = "<lanvisitantes>"
                            
                            # Gateways
                            GWGWADSL = " route-to ( bge0 192.168.1.100 ) "
                            GWGWWAN = " route-to ( xl0 177.135.88.153 ) "
                            GWGWLANNS100 = " route-to ( bge1 192.168.0.254 ) "
                            GWGWLANRV042 = " route-to ( bge1 192.168.0.251 ) "
                            GWGW_Group = "  route-to { ( bge0 192.168.1.100 )  }  "
                            
                            set loginterface bge1
                            set optimization normal
                            set limit states 96000
                            set limit src-nodes 96000
                            
                            set skip on pfsync0
                            
                            scrub in on $WAN all    fragment reassemble
                            scrub in on $LAN all    fragment reassemble
                            scrub in on $ADSL all    fragment reassemble
                            
                            no nat proto carp
                            no rdr proto carp
                            nat-anchor "natearly/*"
                            nat-anchor "natrules/*"
                            
                            # Outbound NAT rules
                            
                            # Subnets to NAT 
                            tonatsubnets	= "{ 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 127.0.0.0/8  }"
                            nat on $WAN  from $tonatsubnets port 500 to any port 500 -> 177.135.88.154/32 port 500  
                            nat on $WAN  from $tonatsubnets to any -> 177.135.88.154/32 port 1024:65535  
                            
                            # Load balancing anchor
                            rdr-anchor "relayd/*"
                            # TFTP proxy
                            rdr-anchor "tftp-proxy/*"
                            table <negate_networks>{ 177.135.88.152/29 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 }
                            # UPnPd rdr anchor
                            rdr-anchor "miniupnpd"
                            
                            anchor "relayd/*"
                            #---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            # default deny rules
                            #---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            block in log all label "Default deny rule"
                            block out log all label "Default deny rule"
                            
                            # We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.
                            block quick proto { tcp, udp } from any port = 0 to any
                            block quick proto { tcp, udp } from any to any port = 0
                            
                            # Block all IPv6
                            block in quick inet6 all
                            block out quick inet6 all
                            
                            # Snort package
                            block quick from <snort2c>to any label "Block snort2c hosts"
                            block quick from any to <snort2c>label "Block snort2c hosts"
                            block in log quick proto carp from (self) to any
                            pass quick proto carp
                            pass quick proto pfsync
                            
                            # SSH lockout
                            block in log quick proto tcp from <sshlockout>to any port 22 label "sshlockout"
                            
                            # webConfigurator lockout
                            block in log quick proto tcp from <webconfiguratorlockout>to any port 80 label "webConfiguratorlockout"
                            block in quick from <virusprot>to any label "virusprot overload table"
                            antispoof for xl0
                            antispoof for bge1
                            antispoof for bge0
                            
                            # loopback
                            pass in on $loopback all label "pass loopback"
                            pass out on $loopback all label "pass loopback"
                            # let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic
                            pass out all keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
                            pass out route-to ( xl0 177.135.88.153 ) from 177.135.88.154 to !177.135.88.152/29 keep state allow-opts label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
                            # make sure the user cannot lock himself out of the webConfigurator or SSH
                            pass in quick on bge1 proto tcp from any to (bge1) port { 80 22 } keep state label "anti-lockout rule"
                            
                            # User-defined rules follow
                            
                            anchor "userrules/*"
                            pass  on {  xl0  bge1  bge0  }  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            pass  in  quick  on $WAN reply-to ( xl0 177.135.88.153 )  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            pass  in  quick  on $LAN  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            pass  in  quick  on $LAN  from 192.168.0.0/24 to any keep state  label "USER_RULE: Default allow LAN to any rule"
                            pass  in  quick  on $LAN  from   $LanVisitantes to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            pass  in  quick  on $LAN  from any to   $LanVisitantes keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            pass  in  quick  on $ADSL  inet proto icmp  from any to any keep state  label "USER_RULE"
                            
                            # VPN Rules
                            anchor "tftp-proxy/*"</virusprot></webconfiguratorlockout></sshlockout></snort2c></snort2c></negate_networks></lanvisitantes></lanvisitantes></virusprot></snort2c></webconfiguratorlockout></sshlockout> 
                            

                            So, I erased the VIP and created again, without a gateway on LAN interface, reset states, and now 10.0.0.8 cannot even ping 10.0.0.5. Packets and state table:

                            16:45:12.039107 ARP, Request who-has 10.0.0.8 tell 10.0.0.5, length 28
                            16:45:17.539196 ARP, Request who-has 10.0.0.8 tell 10.0.0.5, length 28
                            

                            2012-12-20_16-44-59.png
                            2012-12-20_16-44-59.png_thumb

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              Closer..

                              # Subnets to NAT 
                              tonatsubnets	= "{ 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 127.0.0.0/8  }"
                              
                              

                              It is getting your other subnets but not the 10.x.x.x one.

                              Make sure the IP alias VIP has the proper subnet mask set (not /32).

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                mmerlone
                                last edited by

                                @jimp:

                                It is getting your other subnets but not the 10.x.x.x one.
                                Make sure the IP alias VIP has the proper subnet mask set (not /32).

                                /24

                                2012-12-20_16-52-58.png
                                2012-12-20_16-52-58.png_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  And that IP alias is on the correct interface? (LAN)

                                  Check Diagnostics > Routes, paste the output here, it might give some more clues.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    mmerlone
                                    last edited by

                                    @jimp:

                                    And that IP alias is on the correct interface? (LAN)

                                    Oops, well noted. Was not. Corrected and now 10.0.0.8 can ping 10.0.0.5, but not yet 8.8.8.8.

                                    @jimp:

                                    Check Diagnostics > Routes, paste the output here, it might give some more clues.

                                    Attached.

                                    2012-12-20_17-01-23.png
                                    2012-12-20_17-01-23.png_thumb

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jimpJ
                                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      OK that all looks good now - and if you check /tmp/rules.debug and look for tonatsubnets - the 10.x.x.x network still doesn't show up?

                                      If not, then you probably will need to go to outbound NAT, delete any rules there, and switch to manual outbound NAT once more. Then add a rule for 10.x.x.x.

                                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        mmerlone
                                        last edited by

                                        @jimp:

                                        OK that all looks good now - and if you check /tmp/rules.debug and look for tonatsubnets - the 10.x.x.x network still doesn't show up?

                                        Nope:

                                        # Subnets to NAT 
                                        tonatsubnets	= "{ 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 127.0.0.0/8  }"
                                        nat on $WAN  from $tonatsubnets port 500 to any port 500 -> x.x.x.154/32 port 500  
                                        nat on $WAN  from $tonatsubnets to any -> x.x.x.154/32 port 1024:65535  
                                        
                                        

                                        @jimp:

                                        If not, then you probably will need to go to outbound NAT, delete any rules there, and switch to manual outbound NAT once more. Then add a rule for 10.x.x.x.

                                        Why can't that be automatic? Why life can't be easy? Why there's no Santa Claus?
                                        Did not delete existing rules, they look good for me. I just added new NAT rule, reset states, and this time got luck, 10.0.0.8 now pings 8.8.8.8.

                                        Now the questions:
                                        Is that a bug or feature?
                                        If not a feature, where can I request it?

                                        This box will replace an old Netscreen, 1:1 NATing a bunch of servers, responsible for our internet presence, connect two remote offices, provide IPsec VPN for mobile warriors, and some more I don't remember now.

                                        Will leave on vacation now and get back on january 7 to finish this. Happy holidays, merry Christmas, happy end-of-the-world, happy new year, and many thanks for your almost-chat support. I was almost ditching pfsense.

                                        Best regards,

                                        –
                                        Marcio Merlone

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          I had thought it was automatic, but it's apparently not (at least on the version you're using, I don't know about 2.1)

                                          Using multiple subnets on a single interface in that was is still mostly an edge case. Most people put distinct subnets on separate VLANs or interfaces.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.