WAN Interface only gets DHCP if speed manually set?
-
It auto negotiated to Gig, and by the time I logged into the system, it had a correctly assigned DHCP IPV4 address. However, I don't know if Windows "keeps trying" if it doesn't get it the first time around. I think PFSense tries just the one time.
-
I've seen this same behavior before on a Microsoft Virtual PC VM. If I recall I was able to do an interface down/up (ifconfig) and then it would get an address. I know that doesn't solve the problem but perhaps a clue toward the root cause if that works in your case too.
-
It auto negotiated to Gig
My guess is you were using a different cable with the Windows box. Probably now using a CAT5 cable, not CAT5e, which should just negotiate fine to 100 Mb but maybe either the NIC you have or your cable modem doesn't play nicely with autonegotiation when it can't negotiate to gigabit.
and by the time I logged into the system, it had a correctly assigned DHCP IPV4 address. However, I don't know if Windows "keeps trying" if it doesn't get it the first time around. I think PFSense tries just the one time.
No, it'll try indefinitely, the same as Windows and every other DHCP client, it'll keep trying forever until it gets a lease.
-
I can confirm that running the same hardware (Intel D2500CCE with an added two-port Intel Gigabit card for WAN) and a Huawei HG655b xDSL modem in bridge mode I do not get any DHCP replies unless I manually set my speed to 100 Mbps full duplex. I always thought this was an issue with the modem's speed negociation, but this thread makes me think otherwise.
-
I can confirm that running the same hardware (Intel D2500CCE with an added two-port Intel Gigabit card for WAN) and a Huawei HG655b xDSL modem in bridge mode I do not get any DHCP replies unless I manually set my speed to 100 Mbps full duplex. I always thought this was an issue with the modem's speed negociation, but this thread makes me think otherwise.
I had this same problem - it was the cable…
-
"the same as Windows and every other DHCP client, it'll keep trying forever until it gets a lease. "
Not sure I would state it like that for windows - with "windows" the dhcp client will at some point it will just assign its own random 169.254 address (APIPA) This feature can be turned off. But is on by default.
So according to this
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/220874Depending if the interface had a previous address, or lease expires then the timing changes. But yes it does continue to send out dhcp discover either every 3 minutes or every 5 minutes depending even after its assigned itself a 169.254 address. It looks like it will send out atleast 3 discover if has never had a lease. But they also state "more" so its not real clear on exact number of discover it will send our how fast it sends them, etc. Before it does APIPA and then resorts to sending at a timed interval a discover.
-
@cmb:
No, it'll try indefinitely, the same as Windows and every other DHCP client, it'll keep trying forever until it gets a lease.
On at least some versions of Ubuntu the DHCP client gave up after some time.
-
I can confirm that running the same hardware (Intel D2500CCE with an added two-port Intel Gigabit card for WAN) and a Huawei HG655b xDSL modem in bridge mode I do not get any DHCP replies unless I manually set my speed to 100 Mbps full duplex. I always thought this was an issue with the modem's speed negociation, but this thread makes me think otherwise.
Can you do network capture to see if pfSense is making DHCP request. In my MS-VPC instance it was not.
Don't just assume the DHCP request is actually being made.
-
I don't believe dhcp client is going to make a request until the interface is up, interface is not up if can not neg what speed or duplex it should be connected at.
This is why he needs to troubleshoot his autoneg - chicken/egg thing, you can't have dhcp working if you don't have a working inteface. How do you have a working interface if no speed or duplex worked out, etc.
-
I hate to admit it, but it was the cable!
I had already swapped the cable out once before, but obviously I have some inferior cables laying around. Nice new CAT5e cable, and it works perfectly.
Thanks!
-
Great to hear.. Its not very common, but yes sometimes the wire is not quite right..
