Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Gps receiver & ntp

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    45 Posts 14 Posters 32.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      There are a couple other threads around where people have given at least one model number of a device, but I'm not sure if very many people have tried it.

      It works for me, though the device I have leaves a bit to be desired in accuracy.

      In theory it should work with any device that outputs NMEA data over serial, preferably an actual serial connection and not USB-to-Serial.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Cry HavokC
        Cry Havok
        last edited by

        Ideally you want one that supports a PPS signal for an accurate time sync.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          PPS over physical serial, yes.

          PPS over USB isn't feasible, last I read. The timing of the bus isn't accurate enough to guarantee the signaling in the same way that a physical serial port can.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            Roots0
            last edited by

            I have a cheap USB to serial NEMA GPS, and it runs at 500ms off decent time.

            gps.png
            gps.png_thumb

            Mobile Computer & Network Support Stockport, UK
            www.timotten.co.uk

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              daffyq
              last edited by

              Maybe a bit offtopic, but I remember I read something about GPS, UTC and the atomic clock not beeing in sync cause of leap seconds.

              How does that work when you sync with both GPS and NTP? Do you get excact local time anyway, or will your server drift back and forth several seconds?

              http://leapsecond.com/java/gpsclock.htm

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Cry HavokC
                Cry Havok
                last edited by

                Many NTP servers use GPS for their time sync, all you're doing is cutting out the middle man as it were.

                The NTP protocol uses UTC and includes leap seconds. GPS time sources don't include the leap seconds, but they do include the offset from UTC so it's easy for receivers to work out the UTC time, which the NTP daemon will then use.

                In short, it's all handled transparently for you and you don't have to worry about it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  biggsy
                  last edited by

                  Just for fun, I've been looking at building a GPS-based NTP server using this equipment (sans breadboard):

                  http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2012/11/16/raspberry-flavored-time-a-ntp-server-on-your-pi-tethered-to-a-gps-unit-piday-raspberrypi-raspberry_pi/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    robi
                    last edited by

                    @biggsy:

                    Just for fun, I've been looking at building a GPS-based NTP server using this equipment (sans breadboard):

                    http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2012/11/16/raspberry-flavored-time-a-ntp-server-on-your-pi-tethered-to-a-gps-unit-piday-raspberrypi-raspberry_pi/

                    Great article. It shows you why can't you do that built-into pfSense, especially inside ESXi.

                    • you need hardware GPI port to get into the system the PPS signal
                    • you need modified kernel to be able to process in nanoseconds time the PPS signal

                    But nevertheless you can build the whole box as described with a PI. I'd just mount it in a waterproof box and add PoE support and place the whole thing on the roof for the best GPS signal…

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      We have PPS_SYNC in the pfSense kernel, and you can get PPS over serial with a hardware serial port.

                      So you can do it on pfSense, it just requires the proper hardware.

                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        andrew0401
                        last edited by

                        Well spent a massive £19.95 on an unbadged USB GPS dongle, plugged it in - named the ports correctly in ESXi - rebooted the pfsense box - it found the GPS source and it started reporting status!

                        The only slight surprise is that it seems very slow to choose the GPS source as the active peer - both GPS and the back up external NTP server are shown as "False Ticker" and it uses the local clock.

                        Is there a way to make it choose the GPS source as a the preferred option if available or at least speed up the decision making process?

                        Just to make clear, not after a super accurate clock, just that our internet links are so erratic that we cn be out of contact for a few hours at a time- so if the GPS holds us to less than 0.1 of a sec that would be enough.

                        Andrew

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          I've found that using 3-4 NTP servers in addition to the GPS has made mine more likely to be used as the source.

                          Also GPS signal quality can affect things as well.

                          It's already set to prefer the GPS when possible but if it believes that the GPS is far enough off of reality, it can still be discarded.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            andrew0401
                            last edited by

                            Still confused.

                            WE run with the GPS enables and 0.uk.pool.ntp.org 1.uk and 2.uk etc as NTP servers.

                            It tooks about 2 hours to stop using local and switch to GPS as the timesource - worked solidly for about 48 hours and has now swapped to an internet time server even though GPS has by far the lowest jitter - what causes the swap (and how can I influence it?00

                            Thanks

                            Andrew

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Cry HavokC
                              Cry Havok
                              last edited by

                              Can you post the output of ntpq -c pe and ntpq -c assoc?

                              Without having a better idea of what NTP is reporting we could only guess, which is pretty pointless ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                Roots0
                                last edited by

                                @andrew0401:

                                Well spent a massive £19.95 on an unbadged USB GPS dongle, plugged it in - named the ports correctly in ESXi - rebooted the pfsense box - it found the GPS source and it started reporting status!

                                The only slight surprise is that it seems very slow to choose the GPS source as the active peer - both GPS and the back up external NTP server are shown as "False Ticker" and it uses the local clock.

                                Is there a way to make it choose the GPS source as a the preferred option if available or at least speed up the decision making process?

                                Just to make clear, not after a super accurate clock, just that our internet links are so erratic that we cn be out of contact for a few hours at a time- so if the GPS holds us to less than 0.1 of a sec that would be enough.

                                Andrew

                                What GPS is this can you link the model?

                                I find it interesting as mine runs half a second of normal time due to what i guess is the usb to serial conversion.

                                Mobile Computer & Network Support Stockport, UK
                                www.timotten.co.uk

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  andrew0401
                                  last edited by

                                  $ ntpq -c pe
                                      remote          refid      st t when poll reach  delay  offset  jitter

                                  xGPS_NMEA(0)    .GPS.            0 l  11  16  377    0.000  -533.88  1.737
                                  LOCAL(0)        .LOCL.          12 l    -  64    0    0.000    0.000  0.000
                                  +ntp.demon.co.uk 195.66.241.10    2 u  230  256  377  23.140  -2.786  0.806
                                  *dns0.rmplc.co.u 195.66.241.2    2 u  162  256  377  24.208  -2.528  0.843
                                  +ntp.oceanmediag 192.93.2.20      2 u  60  256  377  22.431  -2.508  0.433

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    andrew0401
                                    last edited by

                                    ntpq -c assoc

                                    ind assID status  conf reach auth condition  last_event cnt

                                    1  890  915b  yes  yes  none falsetick              5
                                      2  891  8043  yes  yes  none    reject  lost reach  4
                                      3  892  961a  yes  yes  none  sys.peer              1
                                      4  893  941a  yes  yes  none  candidat              1
                                      5  894  941a  yes  yes  none  candidat              1

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Cry HavokC
                                      Cry Havok
                                      last edited by

                                      Yeah, that looks pretty clear, and the assoc output confirms that your GPS is being seen as a false ticker. The time is significantly off from the other sources (and the jitter twice as high), which is why it's being rejected. I'm pretty confident that it's because the GPS doesn't have PPS support.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        andrew0401
                                        last edited by

                                        Maybe a bad exaMPLE QUOTED

                                        THIS IS MORE TYPICAL

                                        $ ntpq -p
                                            remote          refid      st t when poll reach  delay  offset  jitter

                                        xGPS_NMEA(0)    .GPS.            0 l  15  16  377    0.000  -531.24  0.355
                                        LOCAL(0)        .LOCL.          12 l  74m  64    0    0.000    0.000  0.000
                                        +ntp.demon.co.uk 195.66.241.10    2 u  42  256  377  23.525    0.407  18.033
                                        -time.shf.uk.as4 82.219.4.30      3 u  91  128  377  31.379    0.189  9.375
                                        +ntp1.exa-networ 33.117.170.50    2 u  128  128  377  29.922  -0.829  11.751
                                        *ntp.oceanmediag 193.190.230.66  2 u  108  256  377  22.060  -0.943  11.376

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          Roots0
                                          last edited by

                                          @Roots0:

                                          I have a cheap USB to serial NEMA GPS, and it runs at 500ms off decent time.

                                          See my original post and picture, could of saved your self the £.

                                          Mobile Computer & Network Support Stockport, UK
                                          www.timotten.co.uk

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Cry HavokC
                                            Cry Havok
                                            last edited by

                                            The x still means that NTP sees it as a false ticker - again, the offset is quite far from everything else - about half a second if I remember my units correctly. Without PPS support I suspect you won't change the situation.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.