Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    So many filterdns instances…

    2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    10
    57
    18.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dhatz
      last edited by

      I just upgraded to latest snapshot but still get filterdns problems:

      FreeBSD fw.localdomain 8.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p5 #1: Sat Jan 19 21:12:44 EST 2013     root@snapshots-8_3-i386.builders.pfsense.org:/usr/obj./usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense_SMP.8  i386

      MD5 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = 6949816348947b7762586fe3c59b356e

      …
      Jan 21 00:05:28 fw kernel: pid 47308 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
      Jan 21 00:05:29 fw check_reload_status: Restarting ipsec tunnels
      Jan 21 00:05:30 fw login: login on ttyv0 as root
      Jan 21 00:05:36 fw php: : IPSEC: One or more IPsec tunnel endpoints has changed its IP. Refreshing.
      Jan 21 00:05:37 fw check_reload_status: Updating all dyndns
      Jan 21 00:05:37 fw check_reload_status: Restarting OpenVPN tunnels/interfaces
      Jan 21 00:05:38 fw check_reload_status: Reloading filter
      Jan 21 00:05:40 fw kernel: pid 83611 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        dhatz that happens probably because of upgrade is not replacing the filterdns process.
        Can you kill all you filterdns processes before running an upgrade and try again or
        extract the archive of the upgrade and install manually the filterdns binary, it is located on usr/local/sbin iirc.

        I am tracking even this issue of upgrade not replacing binaries at some time.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dhatz
          last edited by

          Indeed it seems that the filterdns binary is not replaced by the upgrade process.

          I will upgrade as soon as a new 2.1 snapshot image becomes available (currently the latest snapshot is from 19-Jan) and let you know how it goes.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            phil.davis
            last edited by

            nanobsd upgrade to 2.1-BETA1 (i386) built on Tue Jan 22 05:52:55 EST 2013 gets the version feature (1.1), but that is kind of obvious since nanoBSD is provided with a full slice. We will see what dhatz gets with a upgrade of a full install.
            filterdns working well for me - but it does accumulate all the IP addresses known to it over time for the list of names. My table now has 15 IPs for 11 names.

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dhatz
              last edited by

              @ermal:

              dhatz that happens probably because of upgrade is not replacing the filterdns process.
              Can you kill all you filterdns processes before running an upgrade and try again or
              I am tracking even this issue of upgrade not replacing binaries at some time.

              Just a quick reminder that doing an upgrade still won't replace the old filterdns binary.

              Btw I have tried killing all filterdns processes before running an upgrade (and verified they had been killed just before starting the upgrade procedure).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                eri--
                last edited by

                Is the issue fixed for you dhatz?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dhatz
                  last edited by

                  Ermal, I upgraded the filterdns binary to
                  MD5 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = af355106eef6aff00d9e6653cca696eb

                  However it seems that the new filterdns needs too much memory at system startup, causing errors like:

                  swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed
                  swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
                  swap_pager_getswapspace(6): failed
                  swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed
                  swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
                  swap_pager_getswapspace(9): failed

                  and it dies shortly after…

                  I've been running the latest pfsense-2.1 snap in a 256MB VM for the past ~10 months and never had this type of problem before.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eri--
                    last edited by

                    Do you have a long list of aliases in the one where you have the hostname?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AhnHELA
                      AhnHEL
                      last edited by

                      @dhatz:

                      However it seems that the new filterdns needs too much memory at system startup, causing errors like:

                      swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed
                      swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
                      swap_pager_getswapspace(6): failed
                      swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed
                      swap_pager_getswapspace(12): failed
                      swap_pager_getswapspace(9): failed

                      and it dies shortly after…

                      I'm seeing this too on my Atom box but not on my Whitebox.  Same snap from yesterday and both amd64.  Filterdns eats up all my memory and then uses up all the swap space before it dies.

                      AhnHEL (Angel)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dhatz
                        last edited by

                        @ermal:

                        Do you have a long list of aliases in the one where you have the hostname?

                        I have

                        • two (2) aliases in fw -> aliases
                          www_google_com
                          www_paypal_com
                          (note: this was just for testing)

                        • one (1) hostname in IPsec

                        • no "allowed hostnames" in CP

                        In the past (until ~2 months ago) these settings resulted into two filterdns processes: one for fw-aliases and one for ipsec, none for CP.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          It's chewing through 100% cpu and all my RAM until it runs out of swap space for me, and I only have three aliases that contain hostnames.

                          truss -p on the filterdns proc shows it trying doing mmap over and over again.

                          
mmap(0x0,1048576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = -1953497088 (0x8b900000)
mmap(0x0,1048576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = -1952448512 (0x8ba00000)
mmap(0x0,1048576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = -1951399936 (0x8bb00000)
mmap(0x0,1048576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = -1950351360 (0x8bc00000)
mmap(0x0,1048576,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON,-1,0x0) = -1949302784 (0x8bd00000)

                          I have a few decent-sized aliases but nothing huge. The filterdns.conf file on this box was only three lines. The size of the aliases involved in the filterdns thread were 1, 63, and 3. So it shouldn't have been all that busy/large.

                          68313 root     124   20   545M   543M RUN      0:05 35.35% filterdns{github.com}
68313 root     124   20   545M   543M RUN      0:05 35.35% filterdns{filterdns}
68313 root     124   20   545M   543M RUN      0:05 35.25% filterdns{some.other.hostname.you.dont.need.to.see}
  262 root      76   20  3416K   736K kqread   1:14 12.35% check_reload_status
68313 root      76   20   545M   543M ucond    0:00 10.99% filterdns{signal-thread}

                          filterdns -v shows 1.1.

                          Size and sha256 match the one on the builder so it is the most current build. (tar is set to preserve old creation times, so of course the date doesn't update…)

                          -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  24160 Nov 19 05:07 /usr/local/sbin/filterdns
SHA256 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = 193ebd8250147041b79385d84efe0f5d09f9ce868ba666b18f91b5098ecce1f3

                          It was being run with the following parameters:

                          /usr/local/sbin/filterdns -p /var/run/filterdns.pid -i 300 -c /var/etc/filterdns.conf -d 1

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            phil.davis
                            last edited by

                            @ermal - when you sort this out, and each time filterdns is updated, can you bump the version number in filterdns.c - that will make it very easy for us all to quickly see which version we have.

                            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              eri--
                              last edited by

                              Should be better on the later snapshots.
                              Sorry for the noise.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jimpJ
                                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                last edited by

                                Seems a bit better so far, copied a binary off the builder to my box and it isn't constantly using that much cpu now, though it did still spike up and use 100% total for about 20-30 sec it did eventually slow down and fall off the first screen of top output.

                                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  dhatz
                                  last edited by

                                  Latest snap v1.2 seems better (no more out-of-swap issues) but is still exits and dumps core:

                                  Jan 28 06:34:45 fw kernel: pid 18434 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                  Jan 28 06:34:53 fw kernel: pid 26566 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                  Jan 28 06:35:23 fw kernel: pid 21538 (filterdns), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space
                                  Jan 28 08:25:37 fw kernel: pid 49708 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                  Jan 28 08:25:50 fw kernel: pid 71990 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                  Jan 28 08:25:52 fw kernel: pid 81465 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                  Jan 28 18:26:29 fw kernel: pid 10297 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) <– updated to latest snap

                                  MD5 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = aea0850239de6ab9817f9330f1807cec
                                  SHA256 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = f2c43ff8e8d6f21047c351e071a203df48bc2899ca7f1564a9cd1998e690081d

                                  On my system there is currently only one filterdns process, whereas there should be a second one handling ipsec hostname(s) – at least that was the case until ~2 months ago.

                                  Edit: There are only two filterdns-related files on my system:

                                  /var/etc/filterdns.conf
                                  pf www.google.com www_google_com
                                  pf www.paypal.com www_paypal_com

                                  and

                                  /var/etc/ipsec/filterdns-ipsec.hosts
                                  cmd vpn.example.com '/usr/local/sbin/pfSctl -c "service reload ipsecdns"'
                                  (whereas vpn.example.com is the name used in P1 remote gw)

                                  Finally /var/run/filterdns-ipsec.pid shows 10297 and timestamp 18:26 which is the process that had crashed earlier (see syslog extract copied above)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • E
                                    eri--
                                    last edited by

                                    Found the issue the ipsec instance is crashing for you.
                                    Should be fixed on next coming snapshot.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      dhatz
                                      last edited by

                                      I'm afraid that even the latest snap is still crashing on my system, same symptoms as in my last post.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • E
                                        eri--
                                        last edited by

                                        Some more protections put on the next snapshots.
                                        Though it runs happily here.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          dhatz
                                          last edited by

                                          Sorry latest snap filterdns v1.2 still bombs out on my VM:

                                          MD5 (/usr/local/sbin/filterdns) = feb00f677248ba323cfdf6398660653a

                                          syslog:
                                          Jan 29 23:56:14 fw kernel: pid 48762 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
                                          Jan 29 23:56:30 fw kernel: pid 80109 (filterdns), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)

                                          ls -lR /var | fgrep filterdns:
                                          -rw-r–r--  1 root  wheel    66 Jan 29 23:56 filterdns.conf
                                          -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    75 Jan 29 23:56 filterdns-ipsec.hosts
                                          -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel       6 Jan 29 23:56 filterdns-ipsec.pid
                                          -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel       6 Jan 29 22:24 filterdns.pid <–-- strange time-stamp

                                          ps:
                                          22425  ??  Is     0:00.03 /usr/local/sbin/filterdns -p /var/run/filterdns.pid -

                                          filterdns.pid:
                                          22425

                                          filterdns-ipsec.pid:
                                          80109

                                          But if filterdns works fine for everyone else, maybe I should re-install my pfsense from scratch, or I can send you my /filterdns.core file (3.4MB) …

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • E
                                            eri--
                                            last edited by

                                            Probably that's teh best choice i guess!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.