Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Portforward using "Other" does not seem to work

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    8 Posts 2 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      eddiex
      last edited by

      Hi!

      My pfsense-box at home has now been running for some time now and it has proven to be rock solid (in every way!) - it is a breeze to use and it does not lack any features that I know of so far. :-) It is running latest stable version of pfsense.

      However, I have one question regarding forwarding ports using the option "Other" in the drop down menu, so below follows my question:
      Creating a port forward using the option "Other" for the port configuration gives me, visually, a port forward in the UI that looks just like any other (working) port forwards that are created using a known port/protocol in the drop down, but it does not seem to forward any traffic.

      Some examples:

      • WAN:80 -> 192.168.2.XX:80 (Works fine)

      • WAN:8080 -> 192.168.2.XX:80 (Does not work)

      My setup is (somewhat simplified, see attached image):
      [WAN] –> PFSENSE --[VLAN TRUNK]–> SWITCH(L2) --[Untagged]–> [SERVER XX]

      Thanks in advance, and I will gladly provide further information/configuration if needed.

      Best regards,
      Eddie
      pfsense-pforward-vlan.png
      pfsense-pforward-vlan.png_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cmb
        last edited by

        If there's absolutely no difference between the 8080 and 80 port forwards (you left source port to any on the dest 8080, everything else matches), then it's most likely #5 here.
        http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Port_Forward_Troubleshooting#Common_Problems

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eddiex
          last edited by

          I had hoped so, but I read those bullets before creating my post and I don't think it is the case here (if I understand them correctly). I have tried different ports and all with the same result, and I was able to forward such ports using my old fw/router (ISP has not changed).

          So either my ISP have changed their available ports or there is something else going on in my pfsense-box?

          PS. Thanks for the QUICK response.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            Post a screenshot of your NAT rules.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eddiex
              last edited by

              NAT rules for 22 and 80 works fine, but the 2222 rule does not.

              See attached image for further details and as I said I'm open for providing more info etc.

              pfsense-nat.png
              pfsense-nat.png_thumb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cmb
                last edited by

                It works, assuming your WAN IP on that system is the same IP you're accessing the forum using.

                telnet 83.x.x.x 2222
                Trying 83.x.x.x…
                Connected to ...................................
                Escape character is '^]'.
                SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eddiex
                  last edited by

                  Hmm, that's really interesting since the only thing I can think of that has changed since my last test was that I upgraded to the latest version of pfsense (from 2.0.1).

                  Then I guess it is solved and the pfsense remains flawless.

                  Thank you very much for the input and help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eddiex
                    last edited by

                    I've now figured out why I was unable to connect using my 2222 NAT, and the reason is blocked ports at work (suddenly they only allow <= 1024) and thus makes it quite hard to verify my NAT rules at home.

                    I'm ashamed to have believed that it depended on pfsense.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.