Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.0.3 Image Testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    100 Posts 29 Posters 43.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      heper
      last edited by

      @Nachtfalke:

      @heper:
      Could this be related to this ?
      http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2155

      EDIT:that appears to be the exact issue yes. It's not the exact issue, it is related tho. Vouchers work for around 1 minute, then they get "disconnected". I think the initial voucher-authentication works fine. the re-authentication (every minute) however, is also applied to vouchers and send to Radius/AD. Radius is unfamiliar with the voucher-code-user and sends "disconnect"

      for whatever reason last weeks snapshot didn't have the issue, but perhaps it just didn't send auth requests every minute, and the new builds do ?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        Nachtfalke
        last edited by

        @heper:

        @Nachtfalke:

        @heper:
        Could this be related to this ?
        http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2155

        EDIT:that appears to be the exact issue yes. It's not the exact issue, it is related tho. Vouchers work for around 1 minute, then they get "disconnected". I think the initial voucher-authentication works fine. the re-authentication (every minute) however, is also applied to vouchers and send to Radius/AD. Radius is unfamiliar with the voucher-code-user and sends "disconnect"

        for whatever reason last weeks snapshot didn't have the issue, but perhaps it just didn't send auth requests every minute, and the new builds do ?

        For curiosity I opened this bug on redmine when there was only pfsense 2.0.0 available if I remember correct. So this bug must have been gone and now is there again !?
        Perhaps this is a sideeffect of something else.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          heper
          last edited by

          i've just noticed something very similar is happening with "Use RADIUS Session-Timeout attributes"

          Vouchers being checked against radius timeout,ย  resulting in disconnect

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            webdawg
            last edited by

            The MPD issue I am having has to do with the auto reconnect (dial on demand mode).ย  I have found the only way I can get my ppp to reconnect is if I check it and set idle to 0.ย  I think it was like this in the previous releases.

            The directions for the dial on demand mode are misleading.ย  They say not to check this box if you want your connection to be up all the time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H
              heper
              last edited by

              anyone can confirm if the CP radius things can still be fixed for 2.0.3 or will it have to wait for 2.1/2.2 ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cmb
                last edited by

                2.0.3 will fix only regressions between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2, and a few minor fixes that have little chance of creating fallout. The above voucher+RADIUS issue won't.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  senser
                  last edited by

                  I am currently using the nanobsd 2.0.2 4G version. Can I use the upgrade file to only update one of the two slices?

                  We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    @senser:

                    I am currently using the nanobsd 2.0.2 4G version. Can I use the upgrade file to only update one of the two slices?

                    Update files only update one NanoBSD slice. That's how they've always worked. You can boot back to the other slice if needed.

                    Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      senser
                      last edited by

                      great, I didn't know that. Not a whole lot of commits to the 2.0 release branch for some time now.
                      when I install a prerelease - how would i update to 2.0.3 once it's released? would I have to reinstall? Thx

                      We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Regular firmware update like any other. If your auto update url is pointed to the 'stable' updates, you'll get it when it's released.

                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          senser
                          last edited by

                          I've updated! The only issue for me was a long delay at boottime because my packages didn't reinstall. Or did they? Directly after the update i accidently loaded my old slice and all my packages got reinstalled into that one. Then, next reboot, i booted into the "new" slice and the firewall took ages to load and all packages were missing. I manually the packages and all is good now. It seems strange though that the package update was triggered when I was booting the old slice (I have updated running from slice number two, maybe thats related).

                          just to clarify, here are my messy upgrade steps:

                          i was running slice 2 when i started the update.
                          on reboot i chose to boot slice 2 ouch* and it reinstalled all packages
                          reboot into slice1: no packages

                          We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jsquyres
                            last edited by

                            FWIW, I upgraded to the latest image (13 Feb 1243), but I'm still having the problem that I initially reported here:

                            http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,57258.0.html

                            That thread eventually got hijacked to be a different issue (but also related to DHCP), but the original problem still remains.ย  This is a regression since pfsense 2.0.1.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              That thread didn't get hijacked, it was the main issue. The interface going down/up wasn't properly relaunching dhclient, and that should be fixed now. Several others with that same issue confirmed it was fixed for them. If there is a separate issue, then you can keep posting in that thread to continue investigating, or start a new one. The symptoms will be (at least slightly) different now, and it warrants further diagnosis.

                              Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                senser
                                last edited by

                                php: /system_advanced_sysctl.php: The command '/sbin/sysctl hw.syscons.kbd_reboot="0"' returned exit code '1', the output was 'sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.syscons.kbd_reboot''

                                smallish glitch in current 2.0.3 pre. That variable is gone I guess?

                                We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  That tunable is only valid on a full install w/vga, or nano+vga

                                  It wouldn't be present on an embedded kernel or regular nanobsd.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jikjik101
                                    last edited by

                                    Proxy Squid: Realtime stat (sqstat) doesn't auto refresh.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jimpJ
                                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      Packages are not relevant to 2.0.x image testing. That would be a subject for the packages board.

                                      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        hackin8
                                        last edited by

                                        Planning to upgrade from 2.0.1 to try and improve MTU control on PPP.

                                        Is it worth going to 2.0.2 or straight to 2.0.3?ย  I guess second question is how close is 2.0.3 to being finalized - days/weeks/months?

                                        Thanks

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          2.0.3 is better than 2.0.2 at the moment.
                                          It would be out already, but we're waiting on FreeBSD to release a security announcement on OpenSSL that we need to account for.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A
                                            acald
                                            last edited by

                                            @jimp:

                                            2.0.3 is better than 2.0.2 at the moment.
                                            It would be out already, but we're waiting on FreeBSD to release a security announcement on OpenSSL that we need to account for.

                                            You guys ROCK!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.