Recent Intel Ethernet driver fixes for FreeBSD

w0w

frater, I don't think your problem is related to those recent intel driver fixes, so it would be much better to create own thread.

w0w

Should I post bounty for tarring up recent driver fixes or? :-\

dhatz

Those experiencing issues with their Intel cards can thank Mat Simon for adding various patches for e1000 from FreeBSD 8-STABLE to pfSense 2.1-DEVEL:

https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/commit/d1014000b73f995019d2c01badca659e49dad6e0

maverick_slo

Sooo if I update to latest snapshot, this should be in?

And thanks to anyone involved!

msi

If you take a snapshot from November 17th and thereafter yes.

I merely took the fixes from 8-STABLE, no heavy-lifting backports from the 9-STABLE, but I guess this is what you've been looking for.
(I'm mostly interested in the igb multiqueue patch, since I'm working with a multicore box and I350's here)

Since I used git cherry-pick, the patches contain the commit message so you can check if it's what you've been waiting for.
I spent some time to identify and nuke disabled patches in the RELENG_8_3 directory, the ones mentioned initially are gone by now.
They were all already disabled and coming from the "dark ages" of 2.0.1 or even older ;-)

dhatz

Mat, since I noticed your comment at GitHub

>hopefully adding some more ore less interesting backport from 8-STABLE against Broadcom bge and bce.

this is just a heads-up that there were several MFCs for Broadcom bge merged into 8-STABLE today.

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243537
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243539
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243542
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243547
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243550
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243552

msi

I have them on my radar since e1000, bge, bce cover quite what is used in most server boards these days.

But since both bge and bce make up a pretty bunch of patches I hesitated a bit.
If there are testers out there I might take take risk to ship them …

It might be interesting for consumer that want to use them in combination with more recent chips present in latest Dell servers as I see.

Edit: Fixes are merged, bge and bce consumer are welcome to test and report back if anything was bricked up (hopefully not).

dhatz

Latest updates of Intel drivers merged into FreeBSD 8.x:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2013-February/065589.html

Log:
MFC of the E1000 drivers to STABLE/8, this includes the follow revisions
plus a few tweaks:
196969,196970,211516,214646,215781,215789,215808,215910,223350,
223482,223831,228281,228393,229939,231796,232238,234665,235256,
236406,238148,238151,238214,238765,238770,238953,238981,239105,
239109,239304,240518,240693,240968,241037,241856,241885,243570,
243857,245334,246128,246482,247064

jimp

…which broke the builds on stable, spamming tinderbox messages to the mailing list...

pass. :-)

dhatz

Jim, I understand it was fixed a couple of posts later.

jimp

I'm sure it was, just pointing out that particular commit did break things. Would need to include any follow ups, if we pull them in.

msi

Hmm currently I'm deprived of any FBSD build VM but I have the patches on my radar.
I'm not sure if it was just a temporary problem but apparently no more additionaly changes have been made on e1000 drivers (until now).

Maybe we could update the e1000 backport series and see if things break :-)
Shall I send a pull request?

jimp

May as well, perhaps under a different filename or method so that we can easily swap back to the other version if needed without completely reverting the work.