Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    I need help choosing hardware for pfsense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    14 Posts 4 Posters 8.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      @chali:

      but I run gigabit network to 50-60 clients on the local network?

      How many interfaces do you use?

      If you will need 1Gbps throughput then yes you will need a more powerful box.
      Any i3 or i5 cpu will handle that. Even a low end Pentium or Celeron Sandy Bridge CPU will push 1Gbps.
      For example: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,45439.0.html

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        NOYB
        last edited by

        There could also be some QoS upstream that you have no control over.  And replacing your router will not change that.

        UPDATE:
        Here's a good read on the ISP QoS subject:
        http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27252457-Internet-Frontier-FIOS-Latency-and-QoS-Where-they-fail

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          chali
          last edited by

          Hello and thank you for answering my question =)

          I have two 24 port gigabit switches + 1 16 port switch Gigbit
          these branches to about 40 different outlets in the house and the rest goes to the neighbor.
          (all are not used) then it's a number of wireless clients that use the 5GHz band with N and ac connection.

          so i3 is good but should I use a dual intel card or two single or something else?

          / Chali

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            So you have three switches but how many NICs do you have in the pfSense box?
            If you have each switch connected via a different NIC then traffic between them has to be routed by pfSense placing additional load on the box. If you only a single LAN NIC then only WAN<>LAN traffic is routed.

            It makes little difference to performance whether you use single or dual port NICs if you are using PCI-e cards. Single port NICs are usually far cheaper so if you have space for them use that.

            The best regarded NICs are Intel server cards. You don't want to get one that is only recently released because there is a good chance it won't yet be supported by pfSense.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              chali
              last edited by

              Hi

              ok thanks for the answers =)

              I connect the switches outside the router ( from switch to switch)

              but you think it is ok to run on a i3 cpu? (type 3220 or 3240)
              googled a bit on it and it seems that several had problems with i3 and pfsense 64-bit
              I do not know if it whas old i3 or what vertion of pfsense.

              / Chali

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                There was a problem with the 64bit graphics driver for those cpus with built in gpu but I thought it had been fixed. You may have to run 2.1 Beta to get that. Otherwise just run 32bit. I'd be very suprised if you need more than 4GB RAM.
                Read through the thread I linked to above. That user was able to get his full line speed (close to 1Gbps) using a Celeron G530 which is quite a bit less powerful than any i3.

                I have not built a box that powerful, I can only dream of getting a 1Gbps connection here!  ;)

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  chali
                  last edited by

                  Hi igen

                  I got these following components.
                  (a bit exaggerated, but should hold for a while)

                  Server MB Supermicro MBD-X9SCL-FO. (2xgig nic)
                  Intel Core i3-3240 Ivy Bridge - Box
                  8-gig ddr3 ram
                  80-gig ssd
                  And it is water cooled (really cool to say that the router is water cooled;-) )

                  Now I'd like to het help finding a good gigabit NICs.
                  I understand that intel is preferable but which?
                  I would like to have 2-4 extra connections (two cards I guess) . but which have the smallest  laytense?
                  (I play fps games and have a movie server that friends and family stream movies from)

                  server I used before raised my laytense with 20-25 even when no one streamed movie.
                  and I do not want to have that again.

                  (old server is this if it helps)

                  HP ProLiant DL380 G4:
                  2x Intel Xeon - 3,2GHz / 2M / 800FSB (64-bit)
                  3 GB DDR2 ECC
                  4x 36 GB Hotswap SCSI
                  Intel E7520 Chipset
                  2x 1 GB nic

                  I can't afford like the worlds best nic (the budget is a bitt low)
                  I think I can afford around 400-500 dollars for 2 x 2 giga nic but as I said what should I choose?
                  (preferably cheaper only they can keep laytense at a low level and be stable)

                  I am very grateful for any suggestions (I've been doing and fiddling with this for a long time, and it would be nice to get a solution to it finally)

                  Ps: im using google translate so sorry for the poor grammar
                  / Sincerely Chali

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    wallabybob
                    last edited by

                    @chali:

                    server I used before raised my laytense with 20-25

                    Do you mean latency rather than "laytense".

                    20-25 what? microseconds? milli seconds? seconds? etc

                    It is unlikely you would notice even 25 milli seconds.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      chali
                      last edited by

                      Hi  :)

                      Of course I mean milliseconds (I'll write it next time so everyone understands).

                      and yes it is ping / latency I mean.

                      for me it is absolutely noticeable whed such increase. (I usually have 20 in ping). but Whatever now, it is not that i am asking , but my question is simply what nic with the lowest latency for the amount I wrote.
                      (I'll still build so why not try to get it as good as possible?)

                      Which of this do you think is best? (http://www.prisjakt.nu/produkt.php?j=928457,79419,785748)

                      ps: I use google translate as usual, so excuse the bad grammar and any errors in abbreviations that may exist.

                      / Chali

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        chali
                        last edited by

                        Hi

                        I fonde this on the intel site (http://ark.intel.com/compare/50496,50490,50484,50483,50481,50398,50488,50486,50482,50497,50494,50491,50489,22191,22192,50495,50397,50396,49186,49185,49187,49184,59063,59062,59065,59064,68668)

                        I'm guessing that the i350 is the best way to go?
                        Butt  is 1xt4. Better then 2xt2 cards?

                        I have ordered two of these cards I hope it will be good http://www.proshop.se/Natverkskort-(adaptrar-osv.)/Intel-ETHERNET-I350-T2-SERVER-CTLR-2281784.html

                        /chali

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.