Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Inter Vlan Routing and avahi / bonjour / mdns

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    14 Posts 3 Posters 29.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      luna_s
      last edited by

      So anyway thought I'd have a go,
      set up the interfaces and no go, the devices aren't being shown in airplay

      Interfaces are lan on vr0, vlan on vr1, lan on vr1

      I set firewall rules up like this

      I can't ping / trace / resolve any .local either?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tim.mcmanus
        last edited by

        mDNS only works on the local subnet.  Are both vLANs part of the same subnet?  Otherwise it won't work.

        http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762

        Section 11:  …

        "Since queriers will ignore responses apparently originating outside
          the local subnet, a responder SHOULD avoid generating responses that
          it can reasonably predict will be ignored.  This applies particularly
          in the case of overlayed subnets.  If a responder receives a query
          addressed to the mDNS IPv4 link-local multicast address 224.0.0.251,
          from a source address not apparently on the same subnet as the
          responder (or, in the case of IPv6, from a source IPv6 address for
          which the responder does not have any address with the same prefix on
          that interface), then even if the query indicates that a unicast
          response is preferred (see Section 5.4, "Questions Requesting Unicast
          Responses"), the responder SHOULD elect to respond by multicast
          anyway, since it can reasonably predict that a unicast response with
          an apparently non-local source address will probably be ignored."

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          luna_s
          last edited by

          Yes but I thought avahi can reflect to all interfaces?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            tim.mcmanus
            last edited by

            They're both based on the same standard which works within the scope of the local subnet.

            I've never set up/worked with/used avahi, so I don't know if it extends the scope of ZeroConfig, but the standard only works within the local subnet.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              iFloris
              last edited by

              Have you looked into wide area bonjour / DNS-SD?
              I think that mDNS can do multicasting over several subnets if you use DNS-SD.

              There was some talk about this back in '07 here:
              https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1251044?threadID=1251044

              Also, MO. wrote the following in '10 about this:

              Theoretically, though, you could configure a router to pass packets bound for the multicast group 224.0.0.251 between your two subnets, which should do the right thing — assuming you don’t have NAT involved. Whether and how you can do this depends on the type of router you have sitting between the wireless and wired networks.

              There Darell Tan wrote a mdns repeater for *WRT here:
              mdns-repeater: mDNS across subnets

              Joel Knight wrote something about this as well, specifically using AVAHI.
              AirPlay, VLANs, and an Open Source Solution

              And lastly, there are applications for windows and osx that can help you, as detailed here:
              Bonjour/ZeroConf/Rendezvous/mDNS across multiple subnets

              one layer of information
              removed

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                luna_s
                last edited by

                thank you, plenty of reading to be done then :)

                In fairness I've read a lot lately on it (ive read that knight blog for instance), set up a Linux machine and tried avahi (then discovered it's probably not possible to do without layer 3 switches) then I remembered I had a pfsense box (alix) and thought i'd give that a try and this has failed also, nothing much has helped so I'm probably going to have to go down a split domain route :( .

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I
                  iFloris
                  last edited by

                  Hopefully that you can find a solution.

                  It seems to me that Joel Knight's solution is the easiest, because you already have access to avahi in pfsense.
                  If you can set the reflector functionality in your avahi-daemon.conf as he has done, that might suffice to get things working as you require.
                  Have you also tried setting your vlans as Knight has?

                  one layer of information
                  removed

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tim.mcmanus
                    last edited by

                    If it's any comfort, I'll be trying to do the same thing next week.  I am physically separating my 10.0.1.x/24 and 10.0.2.x/24 subnets, and we are a 90% Apple/Mac shop.

                    Not sure if I'll implement the Avahi package on pfSense because it's an Alpha release for 1.2.3, but if I get anything to work I'll post back.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L
                      luna_s
                      last edited by

                      This was the problem I had with Ubuntu and avahi, the reflection didn't work (quite possibly because I'm not running L3 switches, the number keeps increasing.
                      I could ping and traceroute .local addresses, but the traffic tried to go outside the lan (no routing on the switches I guess)

                      I thought I could use the pfsense box as a router instead of forking out for an expensive l3 switch, looks like I may need one!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tim.mcmanus
                        last edited by

                        I completed the physical separation of my 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 networks this past weekend.  The 10.0.1.0/24 network has the bulk of the mDNS devices on it, and it is a cheap unmanaged GigE switch.

                        I just installed the avahi package in pfSense.  It seems to be working okay.  There were some interesting log entries generated during install, but nothing to indicate that anything was wrong.

                        I could see my Mac OS X Server 10.8.x from my MacBook Pro.  I could also see the Brother printer I have on the 10.0.1.x/24 network too.  I had thought about firing up a CentOS server on my ESXi server.  I have both the 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 networks going into that box and the CentOS server could route between the two subnets.  In a fit of laziness I decided to go with the pfSense package instead.  I didn't feel like using up a few hours of my life creating another CentOS appliance.  :)

                        Seems to work okay.  No major issues to report.  I wish the package would move out of alpha status because it seems fairly stable.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • I
                          iFloris
                          last edited by

                          Sounds great! So you only installed avahi, nothing else? Did you bridge your vlans?

                          one layer of information
                          removed

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            tim.mcmanus
                            last edited by

                            I don't have any vLANs.  I did at one time have both LANs on the same managed switch but decided instead to move them to a different physical switch.

                            Both LANs can talk to each other, there are no rules preventing communication.  The challenge that avahi solves is mDNS's inability to communicate across different subnets.  It's not in its spec to do that.  avahi solves that problem.

                            I didn't really need to make the change or install the package other than to support a minority of things.  Setting avahi up is very easy.  Select the interfaces you want it to work with and turn it on.

                            So in short, no firewall restrictions between LANs, avahi extends mDNS across both subnets, install is a breeze.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • I
                              iFloris
                              last edited by

                              As an alternative to avahi, I came across this free virtual appliance by Aerohive, aiming to solve this problem:
                              http://aerohive.com/products/software-management/bonjour-gateway
                              http://community.aerohive.com/aerohive/topics/how_do_you_install_free_virtual_bonjour_gateway

                              one layer of information
                              removed

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.