Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense and FreeBSD 9 (2.2?)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    12 Posts 6 Posters 5.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tirsojrp
      last edited by

      This is why using a separated AP is the best option.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        @tirsojrp:

        This is why using a separated AP is the best option.

        ^ that.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          m4f1050
          last edited by

          I completely understand, but not always the best alternative is the one desired.  I want less mix in my network.  The least the better  :)

          I'll definitely check out FreeBSD's compat. list.

          Thanks both!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Depending on your Firebox you may end up limited by CPU rather than wifi throughput.
            Also I have always thought that the claimed requirements for HD streaming are way too high. What throughput are you seeing? What do you need?

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              i also suggest a external access Point…

              N support in FreeBSD isnt horribly fast... in some testing ive done in the lab, its
              about G speed...

              Testing was done with FreeBSD 9.x... havent done any testing with 10.x

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                m4f1050
                last edited by

                @stephenw10:

                Depending on your Firebox you may end up limited by CPU rather than wifi throughput.
                Also I have always thought that the claimed requirements for HD streaming are way too high. What throughput are you seeing? What do you need?

                Steve

                I have the X series.  (x700)  (I think it's celeron 1.2ghz?)

                I configured my plex clients to always transcode.  If I can get faster speeds than G (at least 72 or more) it will help.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  m4f1050
                  last edited by

                  @SunCatalyst:

                  i also suggest a external access Point…

                  N support in FreeBSD isnt horribly fast... in some testing ive done in the lab, its
                  about G speed...

                  Testing was done with FreeBSD 9.x... havent done any testing with 10.x

                  Wow, you serious?  Why the "N" support?  I don't get it…  Hmmm...  I guess I'll get an N900 access point and take out the wifi adapter on my firebox (pfSense)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stan-qazS
                    stan-qaz
                    last edited by

                    Keep in mind the pfSense folks have no control over drivers and such in FreeBSD so they have to work with what they get from that project. For example, I believe the only reason we don't have a 2.0.3 release is that the pfSense folks are waiting on a patch from the FreeBSD people.

                    I looked at the state of FreeBSD internal wireless and thought it was a no-brainer to go with an external access point and skip the whole internal set of issues. Another plus, fiddling or testing with an external access point is unplug the old and plug the new with no impact on the pfSense system. Going back to the old is just as easy if you hit a snag too.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      @m4f1050:

                      Why the "N" support?

                      802.11N is not just more speed.  ;)
                      Your X700 has only 10/100 ports anyway. The maximum throughput is also less than 450Mbps. (less than 300Mbps?  :-)

                      I believe there are cards which support 'Super G' mode if you have compatible chipsets at both ends.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        m4f1050
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10:

                        @m4f1050:

                        Why the "N" support?

                        802.11N is not just more speed.  ;)
                        Your X700 has only 10/100 ports anyway. The maximum throughput is also less than 450Mbps. (less than 300Mbps?  :-)

                        I believe there are cards which support 'Super G' mode if you have compatible chipsets at both ends.

                        Steve

                        At first I wanted less devices on my network but FreeBSD 8 didn't have 802.11n support…  What I wanted out of 802.11n was to max out the 100 of the port connected to my gig switch, but if it's not going to reach 100 with FreeBSD 9 then it's not even worth it anymore to go internal wifi.  Why I am going to do the N900 on my internal network and leave the pfSense just for what it is, a firewall.  :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.