Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense Crashed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    59 Posts 24 Posters 21.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      eri--
      last edited by

      The changes that caused the crashes have been reverted.
      So the new snapshots are safe.

      I would have been interested on your backtraces shown in the info when you rebooted pfSense, if you can get those.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mdima
        last edited by

        I confirm… after a remote update the box is still there...

        Thank Ermal to you and all the staff!

        Michele

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • rcfaR
          rcfa
          last edited by

          @ermal:

          The changes that caused the crashes have been reverted.
          So the new snapshots are safe.

          I would have been interested on your backtraces shown in the info when you rebooted pfSense, if you can get those.

          So was it the build process crashing that caused the issue, or a code change?
          If code change, what was it? Just curious as to what has such strange effects.

          Oh, yes, and also, so far no issues with the new build…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            markuhde
            last edited by

            Thank you everybody! Updating now (no one's on the campground today so it's perfect for this).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jits
              last edited by

              Hi.

              How do you do a backtrace?

              I'm doubtful if I can do it now. I re-installed from scratch and my latest backup were from December 2012. Serves me right!

              In any case, on that particular system running an intel atom 1.3Ghz processor with Realtek daughterboard NIC card, all is well when rebooted with no network cables connected. The second I connect the LAN cable, there is a huge amount of data that starts scrolling up the screen, then it stops for half-a-sec, and reboots. Will do this repeatedly.

              When cable is already connected, the screen halts at either NTP Configured or WAN Configured, then you hear the sound it makes when there is supposedly a successful reboot or restart.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                lucky
                last edited by

                Just tried today's build - 2.1-BETA1 (amd64) built on Mon Apr 29 09:14:28 EDT 2013.

                So far, so good.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F
                  freebee
                  last edited by

                  sbflush_internal cc 0 || mb 0xc2651c00 || mbcnt 4352

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    Clear-Pixel
                    last edited by

                    @lucky:

                    Just tried today's build - 2.1-BETA1 (amd64) built on Mon Apr 29 09:14:28 EDT 2013.

                    So far, so good.

                    Not showing a Apr 29 09:14:28 build  ???
                    http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/i386/pfSense_HEAD/livecd_installer/?C=M;O=D

                    It's only showing  ???
                    pfSense-LiveCD-2.1-BETA1-i386-20130429-0914.iso.gz 29-Apr-2013 09:43 85M

                    Was planning on doing a fresh install but I'm a bit Scared.  :-\

                    Maybe tomorrow do a fresh install off the latest snap shot ???

                    HP EliteBook 2530p Laptop - Core2 Duo SL9600 @ 2.13Ghz - 4 GB Ram -128GB SSD
                    Atheros Mini PCI-E as Access Point (AR5BXB63H/AR5007EG/AR2425)
                    Single Ethernet Port - VLAN
                    Cisco SG300 10-port Gigabit Managed Switch
                    Cisco DPC3008 Cable Modem  30/4 Mbps
                    Pfsense 2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
                    –------------------------------------------------------------
                    Total Network Power Consumption - 29 Watts

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L
                      lucky
                      last edited by

                      @Clear-Pixel:

                      It's only showing  ???
                      pfSense-LiveCD-2.1-BETA1-i386-20130429-0914.iso.gz 29-Apr-2013 09:43 85M

                      Was planning on doing a fresh install but I'm a bit Scared.  :-\

                      Seems like you looked at the i386 build vs amd64, which is what I'm running. Not sure how i386 is working out.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        Clear-Pixel
                        last edited by

                        Oops my bad…

                        HP EliteBook 2530p Laptop - Core2 Duo SL9600 @ 2.13Ghz - 4 GB Ram -128GB SSD
                        Atheros Mini PCI-E as Access Point (AR5BXB63H/AR5007EG/AR2425)
                        Single Ethernet Port - VLAN
                        Cisco SG300 10-port Gigabit Managed Switch
                        Cisco DPC3008 Cable Modem  30/4 Mbps
                        Pfsense 2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
                        –------------------------------------------------------------
                        Total Network Power Consumption - 29 Watts

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          Guest
                          last edited by

                          @rcfa:

                          If code change, what was it? Just curious as to what has such strange effects.

                          My bet would be on this one:
                          https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/commit/3fe8a9cd9297d64ab243fe3f38cea8b4ef147899

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            cmb
                            last edited by

                            @alexh:

                            My bet would be on this one:
                            https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/commit/3fe8a9cd9297d64ab243fe3f38cea8b4ef147899

                            That's it, disabling those kernel patches gets us back to where we were last week before the bad snapshot.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Clear-Pixel
                              last edited by

                              @cmb:

                              @alexh:

                              My bet would be on this one:
                              https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/commit/3fe8a9cd9297d64ab243fe3f38cea8b4ef147899

                              That's it, disabling those kernel patches gets us back to where we were last week before the bad snapshot.

                              What was the important s of the patches?

                              HP EliteBook 2530p Laptop - Core2 Duo SL9600 @ 2.13Ghz - 4 GB Ram -128GB SSD
                              Atheros Mini PCI-E as Access Point (AR5BXB63H/AR5007EG/AR2425)
                              Single Ethernet Port - VLAN
                              Cisco SG300 10-port Gigabit Managed Switch
                              Cisco DPC3008 Cable Modem  30/4 Mbps
                              Pfsense 2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
                              –------------------------------------------------------------
                              Total Network Power Consumption - 29 Watts

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                cmb
                                last edited by

                                They weren't important. They'll have a performance improvement at some point in the future if they can be stabilized outside the main tree first.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.