• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

(New / Fixed) Widescreen Package Update

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
102 Posts 17 Posters 34.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    Supermule Banned
    last edited by May 19, 2013, 8:34 AM

    Out of town at the moment….will give it a shot tomorrow!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      serialdie
      last edited by May 19, 2013, 9:04 PM

      I would be glad to come through with the 20 dollars :D
      Where can I download the pkg?

      TIA!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        Ramosel
        last edited by May 19, 2013, 9:12 PM

        @RchGrav:

        Click the link for the full size picture..

        http://support.mediapassport.com/files/monitorspanning.png

        Now THAT's widescreen!  Yep, let me know how the bounty works and I'm in for $20 when package ships.

        Rick

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Supermule Banned
          last edited by May 20, 2013, 6:55 AM

          If you open the zip you will see the www folder, that should go into /usr/local/www, the subfolders are already laid out in the same manner they go on the drive.

          Back up your originals just in case you find something important that doesnt work, you dont have to worry about backing the images up, they are additive and dont overwrite anything.

          Here is the zip file build from the 2.0.3 release if you want to try it out and let me know how it works.

          http://support.mediapassport.com/files/Widescreen.zip

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            marcelloc
            last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:16 PM

            does it work on both versions? 2.0.x and 2.1?

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Supermule Banned
              last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:21 PM

              Try it out Marcello! It works on 2.0.x for me. Hasnt done testing on 2.1 yet.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:29 PM

                Given the large number of changes to the all.css file on 2.1 I doubt it will work there without a separate version of the package.

                At least this one doesn't stomp on the menu… :-)

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  Supermule Banned
                  last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:30 PM

                  Can you make a dedicated 2.0.x package and then modify the next one to be 2.1 compliant Jim??

                  Just so we can begin to DL it directly from packages ?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    marcelloc
                    last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:34 PM

                    @Supermule:

                    Just so we can begin to DL it directly from packages ?

                    I can help on 2.0.x as the zip looks like almost done.

                    Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                    Help a community developer! ;D

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:44 PM

                      Shouldn't be too hard to make, I just lack the time to do it. The tags can be set to allow it to only be shown on 2.0.x, so that's not a problem.

                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Supermule Banned
                        last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:53 PM

                        Can we get it going then?

                        It would be a very nice addition to the GUI.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          marcelloc
                          last edited by May 20, 2013, 6:00 PM May 20, 2013, 5:57 PM

                          @RchGrav:

                          The screenshot shows pfsense 2.1.

                          EDIT

                          First screenshot shows 2.0.3 and second 2.1  ???

                          Supermule, on what version did you applied the version?

                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                          Help a community developer! ;D

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Supermule Banned
                            last edited by May 20, 2013, 5:58 PM

                            2.0.3 and your right the screenshot show 2.1

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by May 20, 2013, 6:45 PM

                              @Supermule:

                              2.0.3 and your right the screenshot show 2.1

                              I'm looking the code and if it fails to apply the patch, it copies entire file.
                              I'ts not the best way to do that but maybe it's safer to check pfsense version during install process.

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                Supermule Banned
                                last edited by May 20, 2013, 6:53 PM

                                Good idea :)

                                You are right about the screenshots. Shows both versions. Maybe it just works but needs some package building help?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by May 20, 2013, 7:03 PM May 20, 2013, 7:00 PM

                                  @Supermule:

                                  Good idea :)

                                  Manually applying the diff on 2.1 old snapshot, it looks like build for 2.1 (all.css applies fine)

                                  Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/fend.inc.orig /usr/local/www/fend.inc
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/fend.inc.orig	2013-05-19 00:02:16.520088400 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/fend.inc 		2013-05-19 00:02:57.222514000 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/fend.inc using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 failed at 3.
                                  1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/local/www/fend.inc.rej
                                  Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/index.php.orig /usr/local/www/index.php
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/index.php.orig	2013-05-19 00:06:36.901112700 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/index.php		2013-05-19 00:07:33.409266200 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/index.php using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 failed at 469.
                                  Hunk #2 succeeded at 571 (offset 5 lines).
                                  Hunk #3 succeeded at 696 (offset 5 lines).
                                  Hunk #4 succeeded at 764 (offset 2 lines).
                                  Hunk #5 succeeded at 803 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
                                  1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/local/www/index.php.rej
                                  Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css.orig /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css.orig	2013-05-18 23:44:52.680977900 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css		2013-05-19 00:00:43.218025500 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 succeeded at 185 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #2 succeeded at 338 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #3 succeeded at 427 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #4 succeeded at 470 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #5 succeeded at 1304 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
                                  done
                                  
                                  

                                  On the other hand some patches almost applies fine on 2.0.3 too

                                  Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/fend.inc.orig /usr/local/www/fend.inc
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/fend.inc.orig	2013-05-19 00:02:16.520088400 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/fend.inc 		2013-05-19 00:02:57.222514000 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/fend.inc using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 failed at 3.
                                  1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/local/www/fend.inc.rej
                                  Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/index.php.orig /usr/local/www/index.php
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/index.php.orig	2013-05-19 00:06:36.901112700 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/index.php		2013-05-19 00:07:33.409266200 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/index.php using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 failed at 469.
                                  Hunk #2 succeeded at 571 (offset 5 lines).
                                  Hunk #3 succeeded at 696 (offset 5 lines).
                                  Hunk #4 succeeded at 764 (offset 2 lines).
                                  Hunk #5 succeeded at 803 with fuzz 1 (offset 4 lines).
                                  1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/local/www/index.php.rej
                                  Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
                                  The text leading up to this was:
                                  --------------------------
                                  |diff -rub /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css.orig /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css
                                  |--- /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css.orig	2013-05-18 23:44:52.680977900 -0400
                                  |+++ /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css		2013-05-19 00:00:43.218025500 -0400
                                  --------------------------
                                  Patching file /usr/local/www/themes/pfsense_ng/all.css using Plan A...
                                  Hunk #1 succeeded at 185 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #2 succeeded at 338 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #3 succeeded at 427 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #4 succeeded at 470 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hunk #5 succeeded at 1304 (offset -8 lines).
                                  Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
                                  done
                                  
                                  

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Supermule Banned
                                    last edited by May 20, 2013, 7:03 PM

                                    So far so good!

                                    Screendumps??

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      marcelloc
                                      last edited by May 20, 2013, 7:05 PM

                                      @Supermule:

                                      Screendumps??

                                      As diff rejects the patch, it will mess up gui anyway.

                                      I've sent a pm to RchGrav asking from what version did he used to update the package.

                                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                      Help a community developer! ;D

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        Supermule Banned
                                        last edited by May 20, 2013, 7:06 PM

                                        Super! Lets see what he comes back with.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          Supermule Banned
                                          last edited by May 22, 2013, 8:49 AM

                                          BUMP!! Any news of this??

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          17 out of 102
                                          • First post
                                            17/102
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received