Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 DHCP-PD – radvd dies after interface reset - dhcpv6 does not reaquire addr

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    166 Posts 21 Posters 77.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      reslip
      last edited by

      
      [2.1-RC0][admin@fw.subnothing.com]/var/etc(8): cat dhcp6c_wan.conf
      interface fxp1 {
              send ia-na 0;   # request stateful address
       	send ia-na 0;	# request stateful address
      	send ia-pd 0;	# request prefix delegation
      	request domain-name-servers;
      	request domain-name;
      	script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_wan_script.sh"; # we'd like some nameservers please
      };
      id-assoc na 0 { };
      id-assoc pd 0 {
      };
      
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Q
        qubit
        last edited by

        @reslip:

        From the developer shell I did playback gitsync RELENG_2_1. I am still getting errors for dhcp6 on the WAN side.

        Jul 3 10:58:55 php: rc.bootup: ROUTING: setting IPv6 default route to fe80::201:5cff:xxxx:xxxx%fxp1
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcpleases: Could not deliver signal HUP to process because its pidfile does not exist, No such file or directory.
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcp6c[42896]: dhcp6_ctl_authinit: failed to open /usr/local/etc/dhcp6cctlkey: No such file or directory
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcp6c[42896]: client6_init: failed initialize control message authentication
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcp6c[42896]: client6_init: skip opening control port
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcp6c[42896]: add_options: /var/etc/dhcp6c_wan.conf:3 IA_NA (0) is not defined
        Jul 3 10:58:55 dhcp6c[42896]: main: failed to parse configuration file

        As of this post I think the three commits relating to rc.newwanip are in master and not RELENG_2_1 yet

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          razzfazz
          last edited by

          IPv6 (Comcast) had been working fine for me for the past several snapshots, but with today's build, I get no IPv6 address on either the WAN or the LAN interface. I, too, see the following entry in my system log:

          dhcp6c[59733]: add_options: /var/etc/dhcp6c_wan.conf:3 IA_NA (0) is not defined
          
          

          Looking at /var/etc/dhcp6c_wan.conf, it looks like the issue might be that there are two identical IA-NA lines:

          
                  send ia-na 0;   # request stateful address
           	send ia-na 0;	# request stateful address
          
          

          Is that what the upcoming fixes are for?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            razzfazz
            last edited by

            Replying to myself, removing the duplicate line does appear to restore IPv6 addressing for me.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eri--
              last edited by

              I pushed all the fixes in 2.1 and also fixed this issue of double line in dhcp6c config.
              Please test.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                BrianPlencner
                last edited by

                @ermal:

                I pushed all the fixes in 2.1 and also fixed this issue of double line in dhcp6c config.
                Please test.

                So that we are all on the same page, I was going to download and test the build that you are talking about.

                From this page:  http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/i386/pfSense_RELENG_2_1/livecd_installer/?C=M;O=D

                I am looking at this item
                Filename: pfSense-LiveCD-2.1-RC0-i386-20130704-0301.iso.gz
                Last modified: 04-Jul-2013 03:37
                Size: 80M

                Is this the one that includes all the fixes that you speak of?  If so, I'll download that one today and test it out as well.

                Thanks,

                –Brian

                ============================
                – Brian Plencner

                E-Mail: CoasterBrian72Cancer@gmail.com
                Note: Kill Cancer to Reply via e-mail

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eri--
                  last edited by

                  The php fixes i do not think so.
                  You probably have to wait for the next snapshot.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    BrianPlencner
                    last edited by

                    Thanks for the quick reply.  I can wait for the next snapshot.

                    –Brian

                    ============================
                    – Brian Plencner

                    E-Mail: CoasterBrian72Cancer@gmail.com
                    Note: Kill Cancer to Reply via e-mail

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      razzfazz
                      last edited by

                      Yeah, that looks much better.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Q
                        qubit
                        last edited by

                        Upgraded to today's snapshot (July 4) and everything seems to be working here on Comcast again. Upon boot I get ipv6 addressing. Pulling out the cable to the WAN and plugging it back gets ipv6 back cleanly and radvd restarts as well. Sometimes NTP crashes when getting Internet but starting the service a single time brings it up. I no longer get any XID mismatches and now only one dhcp6 is running. Manually releasing and renewing the WAN in Status-> Interfaces only brings up ipv4, but going to Interface->WAN and clicking save and apply only once brings it up perfectly.

                        The only thing that killed ipv6 was updating the bogonsv6 table. I noticed that a bunch of ipv6 multicast activity was being blocked in the firewall log after updating the bogon rules. A lot of traffic from Comcast's ipv6 gateway on the WAN (fe80 address) was being blocked by```
                        drop from <bogonsv6> to any</bogonsv6>

                        
                        I actually haven't gotten this far before so hopefully things will survive past 2 and 4 days. Thanks for the hard work.
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P
                          priller
                          last edited by

                          @qubit:

                          The only thing that killed ipv6 was updating the bogonsv6 table. I noticed that a bunch of ipv6 multicast activity was being blocked in the firewall log after updating the bogon rules. A lot of traffic from Comcast's ipv6 gateway on the WAN (fe80 address) was being blocked by```
                          drop from <bogonsv6> to any</bogonsv6>

                          Excellent observation. I was starting to suspect that.

                          That would certainly explain why a fresh install comes up just fine after the running one pukes on IPv6.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jimpJ
                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                            last edited by

                            It should have logged the blocked traffic, did you see anything in the firewall logs at the time?

                            If we can locate the conflicting addresses we can filter them out during the bogon update routine if we have to.

                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              doktornotor Banned
                              last edited by

                              Well, I get DHCPv6 traffic blocked even on LAN, without any bogonsv6 of course.

                              
                              Jul  5 15:01:14 gw pf: 00:00:12.746276 rule 5/0(match): block in on vr0: (hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 32) fe80::240:8cff:fe7a:7a5c.546 > ff02::1:2.547: [udp sum ok] dhcp6 solicit (xid=dcdc9d (client ID hwaddr type 1 00408c7a7a5c) (elapsed time 52080))
                              Jul  5 15:02:17 gw pf: 00:00:04.172277 rule 5/0(match): block in on vr0: (hlim 1, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 38) fe80::21b:78ff:fe0e:f84b.546 > ff02::1:2.547: [udp sum ok] dhcp6 inf-req (xid=23468c (elapsed time 0) (client ID hwaddr type 1 001b780ef84b) (option request status code))
                              
                              

                              https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3074

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jimpJ
                                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                last edited by

                                @doktornotor:

                                Well, I get DHCPv6 traffic blocked even on LAN, without any bogonsv6 of course.

                                
                                Jul  5 15:01:14 gw pf: 00:00:12.746276 rule 5/0(match): block in on vr0: (hlim 64, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 32) fe80::240:8cff:fe7a:7a5c.546 > ff02::1:2.547: [udp sum ok] dhcp6 solicit (xid=dcdc9d (client ID hwaddr type 1 00408c7a7a5c) (elapsed time 52080))
                                Jul  5 15:02:17 gw pf: 00:00:04.172277 rule 5/0(match): block in on vr0: (hlim 1, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 38) fe80::21b:78ff:fe0e:f84b.546 > ff02::1:2.547: [udp sum ok] dhcp6 inf-req (xid=23468c (elapsed time 0) (client ID hwaddr type 1 001b780ef84b) (option request status code))
                                
                                

                                https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3074

                                Do you have a separate thread for that already? It doesn't quite belong in this one. Different issue entirely.

                                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  doktornotor Banned
                                  last edited by

                                  I have filed a separate issue… sorry. :-)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jimpJ
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    @doktornotor:

                                    I have filed a separate issue… sorry. :-)

                                    I saw it on there but I didn't know if there was a forum thread (I've been busy and not following close this week), it needs some discussion/troubleshooting on the forum and not back-and-forth on the ticket and I figured I'd try to help a bit, just not on the ticket since it's missing some info.

                                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      razzfazz
                                      last edited by

                                      As mentioned in the other thread, I see the same issue of DHCP6 traffic not being allowed in when using "track interface" (i.e., no DHCP relay involved); see issue 3028.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        razzfazz
                                        last edited by

                                        I believe the issue that I'm seeing with track interface is due to what looks like a typo in /etc/inc/filter.inc:870:

                                        
                                                                $oc['track6-interface'] = $oc['track6-interface'];
                                        
                                        

                                        Looking at the surrounding code, it seems like the intended destination was $oic, not $oc. The typo causes the 'track6-interface' not to be added to FilterIfList, which in turn causes the pass rules to not be generated.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          razzfazz
                                          last edited by

                                          Confirmed on my local box that changing the destination of the assignment to $oic causes the appropriate rules to be generated on the tracking interface. Pull request.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            shavenne
                                            last edited by

                                            radvd seems now to be stable for me too. But my Ubuntu clients don't get a address until I start dhclient -6 once?! The only address it sets is the fe80-address (SLAAC?)
                                            I have 'iface eth0 inet6 auto' in the /etc/network/interfaces. Shouldn't they get a address automatically without starting a DHCP client??

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.