Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Fails to load after Jun 15 update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    33 Posts 7 Posters 10.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      @foonus:

      @jimp:

      I just deactivated the patches from that commit, the next new snapshot that builds should have the previous driver again.

      You fixed it!
      Shame they didn't update the Intel drivers instead of the Broadcom ones! ;D

      We did. :-)

      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        foonus
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        @foonus:

        @jimp:

        I just deactivated the patches from that commit, the next new snapshot that builds should have the previous driver again.

        You fixed it!
        Shame they didn't update the Intel drivers instead of the Broadcom ones! ;D

        We did. :-)

        You have no idea how much better the firewall runs now with these Intel drivers updated. I would say that you can literally SEE a difference. Now the line keeps its maximum 20Mbit upload saturated almost full time, before this update 3/4 saturation was the usual top end; and yaโ€ฆ it boots!ย  I knew the Intel drivers were outdated, but I never considered that it would impact performance THAT much!
        Thanks again, and well done!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          Unfortunately, we might have to pull them back out. Apparently they break altq with igb. :(

          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            foonus
            last edited by

            Forgive my ignorance, but why would newer drivers be causing so much trouble in pfSense?
            This whole issue was brought about by updating a Broadcomm driver, and now from what you are saying the Intel updated driver causes issues for some people as well.

            Are both these drivers not released for FreeBSD by both companies? Isn't it their job to ensure that these things are tested before the drivers are released? ย Is this a quality control issue, or simply the fact that they are testing them on a kernel newer than what pfSense is running?

            Rather disappointing that these large companies can release drivers in this state when they have people paid to maintain quality control, and the grief falls on the users and developers of this project that aren't being paid to deal with it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              @foonus:

              Forgive my ignorance, but why would newer drivers be causing so much trouble in pfSense?
              This whole issue was brought about by updating a Broadcomm driver, and now from what you are saying the Intel updated driver causes issues for some people as well.

              Are both these drivers not released for FreeBSD by both companies? Isn't it their job to ensure that these things are tested before the drivers are released?ย  Is this a quality control issue, or simply the fact that they are testing them on a kernel newer than what pfSense is running?

              Rather disappointing that these large companies can release drivers in this state when they have people paid to maintain quality control, and the grief falls on the users and developers of this project that aren't being paid to deal with it.

              Well we are on FreeBSD 8.3, the newer drivers are from 8-STABLE or HEAD/CURRENT. Sometimes the drivers depend on other features that are found there, but that we do not yet have. Usually they work fine, but on occasion there are changes to other subsystems that cause more subtle breakage.

              Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • F
                foonus
                last edited by

                In my case i am lucky since its running well now, will likely be using this snapshot until one is released with newer (fixed& > 2.3.9) Intel drivers due to the performance impact I have seen.

                pfSense loads (now): <intel(r) 8="" 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 2.3.9="">- Works great for my setup - noticeable performance increase from 2.3.1
                pfSense loads (before): <intel(r) 1000="" pro="" network="" connection="" version="" -="" 2.3.1="">- Over 2 years old, no longer supported by Intel!

                Interesting that the Intel website shows the following for drivers:
                2.โ€‹3.โ€‹8: This driver has been developed for FreeBSD 9.x kernel
                2.โ€‹3.โ€‹7: This driver has been developed for use with FreeBSD 7.x kernel

                7.x straight to 9.x right from Intel with no 8.3 in between. Also leads me to believe that the original 2.3.1 was for FreeBSD 7.x or prior.

                What a mess.</intel(r)></intel(r)>

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  @foonus - Do you use traffic shaping? Have you tried using the shaper wizard with those igb drivers?

                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    foonus
                    last edited by

                    Luckily I don't run traffic shaping in this location, thus the reason I have made a hard copy of this snapshot with the new drivers!
                    I ran a test for you to confirm that there was a problem, simply ran the wizard to create it and it came back with:

                    There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: igb1: driver does not support altq - The line in question reads [ 0]:โ€ฆ

                    If you need any more done, let me know, will be glad to help.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      There may not be much more we can do for now. I deactivated that last igb/em update. We could maybe compile a module that could be used/loaded as an alternate driver using that code.

                      Once we get 2.1 done, we'll be focusing on 2.2 on FreeBSD 10 which is leaps and bounds newer than what we have, driver-wise, all around.

                      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        athoik
                        last edited by

                        Hello,

                        Same issue occurs with 2.1.RC0 (on vmware esxi 5.1).

                        The issue happens only on Pfsense17 with memory 6G. All others instances have 2G memory and no problem yet.

                        crash.png
                        crash.png_thumb

                        dup!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          athurdent
                          last edited by

                          This could be totally unrelated, but I noticed the process bsnmpd there. I remember having an issue some time ago when using more that one virtual CPU/Core and collecting CPU info via SNMP (using Cacti). Turning off the CPU check or reducing the VM to only one CPU stopped the crashes.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            msi
                            last edited by

                            argh, yes they were backed out - but reason is valid:
                            https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/commit/0d63350445dad1e7281ba085cd9fa0e0fdd7e261

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.