Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NATting to a virtual LAN IP

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    19 Posts 5 Posters 5.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • maxxerM Offline
      maxxer
      last edited by

      @Metu69salemi:

      What you use for connecting from outside? portforward or 1-to-1 nat?

      NATting, I just need a single port.
      I've other portfw going to the normal lan and works fine, it's the first time I need to do it on the virtual lan

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        Metu69salemi
        last edited by

        Can you show us images of your rulesets.
        I'm curious of your wan, lan, nat and portforward rules

        If you're talking about manual outbound nat rules, that is used from inside-to-outside, but traffic from outside-to-inside it's not working(unless trafic originates from inside).
        In that case(Outside-to-Inside) you need portforward or 1-to-1 NAT.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • maxxerM Offline
          maxxer
          last edited by

          Here linked all screenshots of relevant config.
          thanks

          https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/706934/virtual_nat.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            Metu69salemi
            last edited by

            Hello again,

            Sorry for taking too long to get back here. Still missing few images, like: LAN rules and information of problematic destination ip(is it that 192.168.2.1?)

            And what kind of trafic you want to get inside 192.168.2.* subnet

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • maxxerM Offline
              maxxer
              last edited by

              thanks for your reply.

              Lan rules here:
              https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/706934/lan_rules.png

              yes, the problematic IP is 192.168.2.1.
              I'd like to be able to forward a port (143) from the outside network to the internal virtual LAN IP 192.168.2.1.

              From the "normal" lan (192.168.0.x) access to .2.1 works fine.

              thanks again

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                Metu69salemi
                last edited by

                Looks like your inbound rules are ok, can please view us information of outbound rules, meaning path: (Firewall: NAT: Outbound)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • maxxerM Offline
                  maxxer
                  last edited by

                  sorry for the late reply. Here's the outbound rules page.
                  https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/706934/Outbound.pngs
                  thanks again

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    Metu69salemi
                    last edited by

                    @maxxer:

                    sorry for the late reply. Here's the outbound rules page.
                    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/706934/Outbound.pngs
                    thanks again

                    Atm dropbox views me a 404..

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K Offline
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      Try this one.

                      https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/706934/Outbound.png

                      I'm unaware of a .pngs filetype  ::)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        Metu69salemi
                        last edited by

                        Have you tried to edit that virtual ip with saving it in other type of virtual ip and change it back?`

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K Offline
                          kathampy
                          last edited by

                          If you also have an Internet gateway on WAN, you'll only need NAT rules for accessing the Internet from LAN and LAN Virtual (looks like a double NAT given your WAN subnet), not for accessing LAN Virtual (192.168.2.0/24) from WAN (192.168.1.0/24).

                          If you are trying to directly access a LAN Virtual (192.168.2.0/24) host address from a WAN (192.168.1.0/24) client it's not going to work unless:

                          a) The WAN clients are using pfSense's WAN address as their default gateway.
                          Or
                          b) Whatever device is the WAN clients' default gateway has a static route to 192.168.2.0/24 via pfSense's WAN address.
                          Or
                          c) You have enabled RIP broadcasting on pfSense's WAN interface and whatever device is the WAN client's default gateway has at least inbound RIP enabled on the interface connected to pfSense.
                          Or
                          d) The WAN clients have a static route to 192.168.2.0/24 via pfSense's WAN address. You can configure this via DHCP option 121. Note that when specifying option 121 you must also include the regular default gateway for 0.0.0.0 along with other static routes.

                          Another thing to remember is that the WAN clients' subnet must be /24 or lower or they will only look for 192.168.2.x addresses on the local switch.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • panzP Offline
                            panz
                            last edited by

                            Stupid question: is all forwarding going to pass if "block RFC1918" on WAN is active?

                            pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                            motherboard: MSI C847MS-E33 Micro ATX (with Intel Celeron CPU 847 @ 1.10 GHz) ~ PSU: Corsair VS350 ~ RAM: Kingston KVR1333D3E9S 4096 MB 240-pin DIMM DDR3 SDRAM 1.5 volt ~ NIC: Intel EXPI9301CTBLK (LAN) ~ NIC: D-Link DFE-528TX (CAM) ~ Hard Disk: Western Digital WD10JFCX Red ~ Case: Cooler Master HAF XB ~ power consumption: 21 Watts.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K Offline
                              kathampy
                              last edited by

                              Not if the block rule is above the NAT rule.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • panzP Offline
                                panz
                                last edited by

                                @KurianOfBorg:

                                Not if the block rule is above the NAT rule.

                                So, maxxer has to put his WAN allow rules before RFC1918 blocking rule?

                                pfSense 2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                motherboard: MSI C847MS-E33 Micro ATX (with Intel Celeron CPU 847 @ 1.10 GHz) ~ PSU: Corsair VS350 ~ RAM: Kingston KVR1333D3E9S 4096 MB 240-pin DIMM DDR3 SDRAM 1.5 volt ~ NIC: Intel EXPI9301CTBLK (LAN) ~ NIC: D-Link DFE-528TX (CAM) ~ Hard Disk: Western Digital WD10JFCX Red ~ Case: Cooler Master HAF XB ~ power consumption: 21 Watts.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • K Offline
                                  kathampy
                                  last edited by

                                  IF your WAN subnet is private you shouldn't have the block rule.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.