Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS problems

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    11 Posts 4 Posters 5.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Aric
      last edited by

      I can ping google dns servers. But as soon as I add them to my DNS list they become unreachable. When I change them back to allow DHCP to override. They are still unreachable in ping

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        wallabybob
        last edited by

        Please post the output of the ping command. The ping response is nearly always significantly more informative than the executive summary "cannot ping".

        Please post the output of the pfSense shell command:```
        traceroute 208.67.220.220

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          Aric
          last edited by

          This is from windows.

          Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
          Reply from 192.168.1.1: Destination host unreachable.
          Reply from 192.168.1.1: Destination host unreachable.
          Reply from 192.168.1.1: Destination host unreachable.
          Reply from 192.168.1.1: Destination host unreachable.

          Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
              Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

          This is from shell of pfsense

          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(1): traceroute 8.8.8.8
          traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
          1  * *traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          traceroute: wrote 8.8.8.8 40 chars, ret=-1
          *
          traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          2 traceroute: wrote 8.8.8.8 40 chars, ret=-1
          *traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          traceroute: wrote 8.8.8.8 40 chars, ret=-1
          *traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          traceroute: wrote 8.8.8.8 40 chars, ret=-1
          ^C
          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(2):

          Trying OPENDNS

          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(29): traceroute 208.67.220.220
          traceroute to 208.67.220.220 (208.67.220.220), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
          1  * * *
          2  * *traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          traceroute: wrote 208.67.220.220 40 chars, ret=-1
          *
          traceroute: sendto: Host is down
          3 traceroute: wrote 208.67.220.220 40 chars, ret=-1
          ^C
          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(30):

          Trying google

          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(30): traceroute google.com
          traceroute: Warning: google.com has multiple addresses; using 74.125.225.224
          traceroute to google.com (74.125.225.224), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
          1  XXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXXX)  6.759 ms  6.186 ms  7.308 ms
          2  XXXXXXXXXX-link.sta.suddenlink.net (XXXXXXXXXXX)  7.181 ms  10.925 ms  8.038 ms
          3  XXXXXXXXXX-link.sta.suddenlink.net (XXXXXXXXXXX)  37.937 ms  38.698 ms  36.757 ms
          4  173-219-243-24-link.sta.suddenlink.net (173.219.243.24)  38.454 ms  37.381 ms  37.895 ms
          5  72.14.223.10 (72.14.223.10)  47.774 ms  67.867 ms  47.355 ms
          6  * * *
          7  209.85.240.77 (209.85.240.77)  36.039 ms  37.560 ms  36.105 ms
          8  dfw06s26-in-f0.1e100.net (74.125.225.224)  37.024 ms  35.643 ms  36.019 ms
          [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(31):

          Hope this helps

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Aric
            last edited by

            This is the ping

            [2.1-RC1][root@pfsense.home]/root(31): ping 8.8.8.8
            PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
            ping: sendto: Host is down
            ping: sendto: Host is down
            ping: sendto: Host is down
            ping: sendto: Host is down
            ping: sendto: Host is down
            ^C
            –- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
            5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by

              Are you finding yourself in China? Is your ISP Chinese? Or, is your ISP just a bunch of morons? Googling for "suddenlink DNS problems" is rather revealing…  ::)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                Aric
                last edited by

                I know suddenlink DNS sucks.. Thats why I want to us OpenDns or google dns. I have used Opendns for years and my firebox died so I made a new box and it wont work and anytime I put in a DNS server it winds up going down, ait dosent matter that I can ping it before I add it to my DNS list. As soon as I add it, its gone even if I remove it from my list.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  SuddenSink

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    @Aric:

                    I know suddenlink DNS sucks.. Thats why I want to us OpenDns or google dns. I have used Opendns for years and my firebox died so I made a new box and it wont work and anytime I put in a DNS server it winds up going down, ait dosent matter that I can ping it before I add it to my DNS list. As soon as I add it, its gone even if I remove it from my list.

                    What I'm suggesting is that they maybe extended their DNS hijacking "business" to blackhole third-party DNS altogether. Sorry, I cannot see how's this pfS issue. Get in touch with the sucky ISP.

                    You can try with these public DNS servers:
                    217.31.204.130 / 2001:1488:800:400::130
                    193.29.206.206 / 2001:678:1::206

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      I've been pretty happy with OpenNIC so far.  No DNS modification/redirection.  Seems to work well.
                      And bonus, they don't think their business should include logging my every site for all of posterity.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        Aric
                        last edited by

                        Well its not sucky suddenlink. It has to be pfsense. I did a total restore of Version 2.1. It worked, as soon as I change the DNS from google to opendns it started again. I installed 2.03 like I used to use and it works great. Might be a bug might not be… Could be a setting that I did. Not sure either way 2.03 works great.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.