Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel DN2800mt x64 2.0.3-2.1 bandwidth

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    81 Posts 6 Posters 23.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jbmeth007
      last edited by

      I did that from the get go..  standard practice minimizing latency.  Hyperthreading is off..  right now as we speak I have both tcp offload engine off, "tried with it on as well"

      232Mbps

      last pid: 39883;  load averages:  0.21,  0.41,  0.24  up 0+00:05:08    23:24:26
      113 processes: 3 running, 93 sleeping, 17 waiting

      Mem: 57M Active, 19M Inact, 67M Wired, 284K Cache, 18M Buf, 1806M Free
      Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free

      PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE    RES STATE  C  TIME  WCPU COMMAND
        11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K CPU0    0  4:12 88.28% [idle{idle: cpu0}]
        11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K RUN    1  3:45 83.98% [idle{idle: cpu1}]
          0 root    -68    0    0K  240K -      0  0:23  9.28% [kernel{em1 que}]
          0 root    -68    0    0K  240K -      1  0:22  8.40% [kernel{em2 que}]
      69333 root      47    0  6956K  1592K select  1  0:09  3.27% /usr/sbin/syslogd -s -c -c -l /var/dhcpd/va
      31969 root      76    0  142M 41148K piperd  1  0:07  2.69% /usr/local/bin/php{php}
      18343 root      44    0  5780K  1072K piperd  0  0:04  0.49% logger -t pf -p local0.info
          0 root    -16    0    0K  240K sched  1  0:44  0.00% [kernel{swapper}]
        257 root      76  20  6908K  1360K kqread  1  0:18  0.00% /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status
      18245 root      44    0 11748K  2712K bpf    0  0:02  0.00% /usr/sbin/tcpdump -s 256 -v -S -l -n -e -tt
        12 root    -32    -    0K  272K WAIT    0  0:00  0.00% [intr{swi4: clock}]
        14 root    -16    -    0K    16K -      0  0:00  0.00% [yarrow]
      28465 root      76    0  136M 21540K wait    1  0:00  0.00% /usr/local/bin/php
      27988 root      76    0  136M 21540K wait    0  0:00  0.00% /usr/local/bin/php
      27735 root      44    0 24220K  3936K kqread  0  0:00  0.00% /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd -f /var/etc/lighty
          3 root      -8    -    0K    16K -      0  0:00  0.00% [g_up]
      59199 root      76  20  8296K  1776K wait    1  0:00  0.00% /bin/sh /var/db/rrd/updaterrd.sh
      22760 root      44    0  5780K  1460K select  1  0:00  0.00% /usr/local/sbin/apinger -c /var/etc/apinger

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        Really?  Hmmmm…
        Its good to know all my theories are not off the wall then.

        Question - How long is this test you run?
        Is it long enough to see if HDD is involved in the process?

        (CPU is largely idle.  Its got me looking elsewhere.  PCIe is plenty fast)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jbmeth007
          last edited by

          it runs indefinitely until I disconnect..  I'll have my SSD tomorrow,  im not sure thought that its touching anything on the HD

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            I'm not sure that it is.  Also not sure it isn't.  Firewall gets logged.  States get logged.  There is squid…  I'm just interested to see what it would do with SSD.  Speaking of SSD, what kind?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Jbmeth007
              last edited by

              lemme run downstairs and try swapping cables..

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Jbmeth007
                last edited by

                cable change did nothing.  its a 32Gig Samsung Full height mSata..  rated 520MB/s, I think the 32 gig is a 4channel though so it will probably be around 320MB/s.. I put it on a compeletly separate gig switch too….  I'm gonna put both these computers on the same switch and see if I get the bandwidth i'm looking for.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  Yep - Being on same physical switch might speed things along.  Its a good switch?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    Jbmeth007
                    last edited by

                    yep  Enterasys b3g124-48..  and yes maxed out the lan link.  this is frustrating

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      That is really too nice a rig for a home play toy…

                      I just picked up a HP V1910-24G 24 port for $30 and I was jumping with joy...

                      I'm easily happy...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kejianshi
                        last edited by

                        My next question might be stupid, so feel free to call me an idiot for asking…

                        You have no slow painful packages like snort running?  No traffic shapers running anywhere?

                        (asking dumb questions is part of my brainstorming process)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          Jbmeth007
                          last edited by

                          @kejianshi:

                          That is really too nice a rig for a home play toy…

                          I just picked up a HP V1910-24G 24 port for $30 and I was jumping with joy...

                          I'm easily happy...

                          I found mine on a ebay ad from someone "junking a old business"  HAHHAAHAH..  100 bux shipped.  I snatched with the quickness.  Of course overkill is always nice.

                          nope, fresh installation no packages

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            Jbmeth007
                            last edited by

                            im gonna try reinstalling, not that it would make a difference, perhaps something got screwed up.  be back in a few.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kejianshi
                              last edited by

                              I found two references to check…

                              1.  reviewing you dmesg output that you have no other device using one of the nic's irqs

                              2.  Try with system > advanced > polling on.

                              Might as well try before a reinstall....

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                Jbmeth007
                                last edited by

                                how would I go about checking irq

                                in bios I have everything extra disabled.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  Jbmeth007
                                  last edited by

                                  ok weird thing,  reinstalled cpu0 is showing idle 24%  and 11% under load. while cpu1 is sitting 88.77%idle.

                                  could it be misrepresenting cpu idle state after updates?   poll is enabled..  sitting 100% idle,  or is it the Polling eating cpu?  I get same throughput.

                                  also going over dmesg list,  Looks like my nic uses irq 17 and 18.  18 is also shared with USB controller..  Let me try disabling all usb  no terminal

                                  Just tried changing tool to iperf and netted 193Mbit and 191Mbit on default test.  this isn't right.  I can't for the life of me figure out why it doesn't saturate cpu or nic.  just a little more information. when I run iperf or tamosoft tools, I can still pull 55Mb from my isp.  the cpu gets further away from idle when I do.  so I dont' know anymore.  time for sleep.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Are you running 'top -SH' to show all system processes etc?

                                    If you try polling, it's not recommended, make sure it correctly stops polling when you disable it again. I found it sometimes gets 'stuck'. Reboot.

                                    You could try enabling IP fast forwarding in System: Advanced: System Tunables: That usually speeds things up when routing but breaks IPSec so no good if you need that.

                                    Steve

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • W
                                      wallabybob
                                      last edited by

                                      Do you have hardware flow control enabled on all the links?

                                      What is the size of the data blocks sent over the wire in your tests? What TCP window sizes are you using? How many concurrent connections are you running?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        Jbmeth007
                                        last edited by

                                        @wallabybob:

                                        Do you have hardware flow control enabled on all the links?

                                        What is the size of the data blocks sent over the wire in your tests? What TCP window sizes are you using? How many concurrent connections are you running?

                                        iperf's default size  8, MTU 1500.   just one connection

                                        There is another pfsense box on the network, configured seperate vlan.  I dont think that has anything to do with it though.  it passes dhcp and dns to wan side.  which iperf server is on that side of the vlan/wan  depending if your left handed or right.

                                        vlan side of subject pf, is direct to pc.  Flow control is enabled on rx/tx

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          Jbmeth007
                                          last edited by

                                          @stephenw10:

                                          Are you running 'top -SH' to show all system processes etc?

                                          If you try polling, it's not recommended, make sure it correctly stops polling when you disable it again. I found it sometimes gets 'stuck'. Reboot.

                                          You could try enabling IP fast forwarding in System: Advanced: System Tunables: That usually speeds things up when routing but breaks IPSec so no good if you need that.

                                          Steve

                                          yup,  i got stuck and had to reboot last night.  I'll try the fast forwarding

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • K
                                            kejianshi
                                            last edited by

                                            Yeah - I'd read that sometimes polling doesn't work well, but I also figured it can't hurt to try if you are about to wipe and reinstall.
                                            Still didn't get near full network speed huh?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.