Trouble with pfsense + dansguardian + sqid3
-
Hi,
yes - the LAN address of my pfsense box is 192.168.1.2…
I've changed web UI to listen to 8080 on my pfsense box...
I'm not sure what you mean about "not destination address of pfSense"...
/Bjørn-Ove
The reason you're seeing the web UI is because you are running it on port 8080…
-
Hi,
that solved the issue about just coming to the login page - but now I see that my pfsense box doesn't listen on port 8080 (DansGuardinan)…
-
We don't know what you did… So, what change did you make?
-
I changed the port that pfsense UI listens on to 7080 instead of 8080.
Now, Dansguardinan doesn't start…and I need to know why.
tcp listening:
s(20): netstat -an | grep -i listen
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.3128 . LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.7080 . LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 *.53 . LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.53 . LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.22 . LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 *.22 . LISTENI can't find any processes running related to Dansguardinan eighter...
-
Did you try reinstall dansguardian package and reboot?
-
yepp - nothing changed…DG does not start...digging for logs...
Anything I can check at command prompt ?
when typing this:
dansguardian
Error resolving icap host address.
Content scanner plugin init returned error value: -1
Error loading CS plugins
Error parsing the dansguardian.conf file or other DansGuardian configuration files -
I don't know what you did that is causing the dansguardian error. However, it is not related to changing the web UI to run on 7080. I suspect Dans was never running…
-
Lets try something new…
Try this.
Stop the squid process from the web gui.
Then go to pfsense command line
type:
cd /var/squid/cache
rm -rf *
squid -z
Should clear the cache.
Then reboot pfsense.
-
Hi,
thanks…tried the last suggestion - no change.
And yes - as mentioned above, I also suspect that DG never worked, I was just fooled by the port 8080 since UI listened on that...
I've uninstalled squid and DG - rebooted - installed DG and squid -> No luck... :-\
Any other suggestions to what could cause this ?
-
OK… just did a little googling. It appears to me that perhaps the icap error is caused by DG not being able to get your host by name. Is there something wrong with how your host name is setup? Do you have your host name in any of the DG configs?
-
I'm not using hostname (eighter shortname or fqdn) in any configuration file…but, could it be that it tries to do a lookup ?
Anyway, I'm now trying to set up DG on a separate box (CentOS) and have a config like this:
pfsensebox: running squid on port 3128 on LAN interface (192.168.1.2)
pfsensebox: NAT rule point at the new server 192.168.1.9 (tcp/8080)DGbox: listening on 8080
DGbox: proxyip 192.168.1.2
DGbox: proxyport 3128When I activate the NAT rule - web browsing stops...
UPDATE: when configureing the web browsers proxy IP directly to DG server - it's working...but I need to get this working by forwarding tcp/80 to DG:8080...
augh... :-\
-
Conceptually your new config should work (although it is unnecessary). You've got to go through some debugging steps and figure out where things are failing. Start eliminating variables - for example, have you tried configuring a client to use the new box and port 8080 as a proxy?
-
Yes - when configuring the client's proxy in the web browser to point towards my new DG box - DG works…and - while watching squid logs on my pfsense box...DG server redirect to it...
My problem now is to find out how to redirect web access (tcp/80) from default gateway (pfsense box) to DG...
client –-tcp/80---> pfsense/defgw –--redirect tcp/80 to DGserver/8080 ---> DGserver –-filterfilterfilter ---> pfsense/squid 3128 –--to the web --->
-
Just a thought…while all my clients are configured with pfsense as default gateway - and when enabling the squid server as "transparent" all request automatically will be redirected to port 3128...then squid will handle all requests. When enabling my NAT rule to forward tcp/80 request to the DG server - something crashes...and web browsing stop working.
cut and paste from pfsense proxy ui:
"If transparent mode is enabled, all requests for destination port 80 will be forwarded to the proxy server without any additional configuration necessary." -
My problem now is to find out how to redirect web access (tcp/80) from default gateway (pfsense box) to DG…
client –-tcp/80---> pfsense/defgw –--redirect tcp/80 to DGserver/8080 ---> DGserver –-filterfilterfilter ---> pfsense/squid 3128 –--to the web --->
All looks correct. Now create a LAN NAT rule that redirects anything that is destination port 80 to DGserver/8080. Should work fine…
-
Hi again,
OK - just to rule out any issues with my pfsense box, I've installed and configured squid on the same server as Dansguardian. Now - when configuring dansguardian as a proxy in my browser, this works. But, I still want to redirect all tcp/80 connections via my firewall towards dansguardian (tcp/8080).
I've created a NAT rule as attached to this post…but, when this is enabled web browsing stop working...are there any faults in my NAT rule ?
squid and dansguardian are uninstalled on my pfsense box.
-
These services were not running on the same box?
Why do people do this to themselves? -
Yeah. Thats how mine looks except I would expect redirect target IP to be 192.168.1.1, not .9
"squid and dansguardian are uninstalled on my pfsense box"
I hope you meant installed…
-
@kejianshi: all services was installed on one box - dansguardian didn't work at all.
So, I installed squid and dansguardian on a separate server, which is working if i configure proxy-settings in my web browser. But, I don't want to do it this way - I want to redirect the traffic so the user can't affect web traffic without even get more creative that they already are (teenages in the house).
So yes - i uninstalled squid and dg on my pfsense box.
Now - when trying to redirect the traffic (tcp/80) to my dg-box (192.168.1.9:8080) i created that rule…but it doesn't work...
-
To me it sounds like something on your pfsense box got seriously screwed up and that maybe the answer is reinstall that box clean then cleanly add in your packages and rules.