Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware recommendations?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    38 Posts 7 Posters 9.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      @CaptainWTF:

      @Stephen, That is a non gigabit model.
      What are the models that ARE gigabit?

      The X550e has 4 Marvell Gigabit NICs. The details on that ebay auction are wrong.
      Hardware details of all the fireboxes are listed on the wiki page: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/PfSense_on_Watchguard_Firebox

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rjcrowder
        last edited by

        @kejianshi:

        So, frequent writes will kill a cheaper SSD.  By cheaper, I mean anything that isn't industrial SSD is a gamble in my opinion for full install with SSD.

        Gotta agree with this… I've killed several cheaper SSD's. The latest is an Intel and it seems fine so far.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kejianshi
          last edited by

          SLC SSD is just fairly bullet-proof anyway, which is probably what you have.  But most people don't seem to get that if it isn't SLC its just a matter of time.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            Dr_Drache
            last edited by

            @kejianshi:

            So, frequent writes will kill a cheaper SSD.  By cheaper, I mean anything that isn't industrial SSD is a gamble in my opinion for full install with SSD.

            Gotta agree with this… I've killed several cheaper SSD's. The latest is an Intel and it seems fine so far.

            @kejianshi:

            SLC SSD is just fairly bullet-proof anyway, which is probably what you have.  But most people don't seem to get that if it isn't SLC its just a matter of time.

            this isn't as true as fear mongers like to think, if you treat the device like it has a finite write, it will last a long long time.
            I have a cache on a old kingston MLC 30gb , still going strong with large amount of writes,
            but, things like non-journaled, noatime, nodirtime, (and in newer systems/drives) discard, ALMOST makes the difference between the 2 techs nothing more than dollar signs, now once you go to capped SSD's, then we are in a totally different market.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tester_02
              last edited by

              I ran a Kingston(intel) 40gb ssd for 2 years on a physical live install of pfsense (1.2.x versions) with no issues before I switch to virtual.  It's now running as a bootup drive on a server.  I think people's fear of wearing out SSD's is overrated.  If you know you have a high write setup, then that would be the only place I would worry (I do have a HD on such a server).  All I can say is stay away from brands that don't have a reputation as well as anything too small (so it has wear space).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kejianshi
                last edited by

                I'll agree that if you take all kinds of precautions to reduce writes to a MLC you MIGHT be ok, or you MIGHT be gambling.
                SLC doesn't cost a bunch more for no reason at all - Its just better.

                My opinion is still up in the air on the newer MLCs with sandforce and "duraclass" garbage disposal.

                If I needed my full install install of pfsense to double as my volleyball or soccer ball, I'd use SSD for sure, otherwise as long as my pfsense sits on a table and shock/impact isn't an issue, I'm waiting on TRIM to be well sorted out.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  Dr_Drache
                  last edited by

                  @kejianshi:

                  I'll agree that if you take all kinds of precautions to reduce writes to a MLC you MIGHT be ok, or you MIGHT be gambling.
                  SLC doesn't cost a bunch more for no reason at all - Its just better.

                  My opinion is still up in the air on the newer MLCs with sandforce and "duraclass" garbage disposal.

                  If I needed my full install install of pfsense to double as my volleyball or soccer ball, I'd use SSD for sure, otherwise as long as my pfsense sits on a table and shock/impact isn't an issue, I'm waiting on TRIM to be well sorted out.

                  trim works fine up-to-date BSD releases, pfsense is just on the backside of that curve, it's coming! soon! ™

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kejianshi
                    last edited by

                    Yeah - I'm sort of expecting it in 2.1 but not too sure.  I've seen some of the devs talk it. 
                    It would be a great thing to have.  I know its just a matter of time.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rjcrowder
                      last edited by

                      According to this http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,62648.msg338372.html#msg338372 you can enable it in 2.1 Haven't tried it yet because I haven't switched to 2.1 for my "prod" firewall.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        CaptainWTF
                        last edited by

                        Anyone know what the status is for pfsense support on these e-350 APU's?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          Ecnerwal
                          last edited by

                          @CaptainWTF:

                          Anyone know what the status is for pfsense support on these e-350 APU's?

                          Short answer - load up the LiveCD and try it. You stated that you "had this to play with" - so play with it.

                          Long answer that's still short - there's a compatibility list (it's a Free BSD compatibility list) - check it. The short answer is more direct and takes less time. Things not on the list may work; so back to the short answer.

                          pfSense on i5 3470/DQ77MK/16GB/500GB

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.