Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [SOLVED] Load Balancing Not Working After Upgrade to 2.1

    Routing and Multi WAN
    2
    5
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      linuxg33k
      last edited by

      Hi all,

      My PFSense firewall had been working great until I upgraded this morning.  I've made no changes to my configuration that has worked for the past few months.  All of my settings held true since the upgrade.  Under System > Routing > Gateways my primary WAN (WAN0) now has a checkbox in the default gateway that is checked.  I cannot get that "default gateway" box unchecked no matter what I try.  When I tested my load balance / failover, I'm only getting the max bandwidth from one device instead of both as I used to.  Also, when I tested my failover, it no longer works as well.  Are there any fixes or has anyone else noticed this as well?

      Thanks for your help in advance.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        phil.davis
        last edited by

        Only 1 gateway can be the default gateway. For load balancing, you should have a gateway group, containing multiple WAN gateways. Then rules on LAN to match traffic you want to load balance and, in the advanced section, send that traffic to the gateway group.

        As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
        If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          linuxg33k
          last edited by

          Thanks for your reply.  This is exactly how I have this configuration set up.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            linuxg33k
            last edited by

            My apologies and thanks to all that responded.  This was truly a PEBKAC issue.  I should probably get decent sleep prior to making firewall modifications.

            Thanks,

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              phil.davis
              last edited by

              Glad you mentioned PEBCAK. This WiKi article is quite amusing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_error
              including "Don't think of the user as making errors; think of the actions as approximations of what is desired"
              and, in reference to ID10T - "Historical use (circa 1995) includes phone tech support personnel instructing the user/customer to place the line "id=10t" in their CONFIG.SYS file as a warning to future tech support personnel."

              As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
              If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.