Any advice on Realtek nics - RTL8111E
-
Intel is always preferably to Realtek, especially for that little of a difference in the long run.
If you have a very light traffic load and will not stress it much, the Realtek NICs may be OK, but if you have a choice of getting Intel cards, go Intel.
-
Thanks. Do you know or suggest a best bang for the buck system on a 20mb connection and able to run the snort package? 5 openvpn users doing file sharing ? I was thinking alix2d3 but it
May not work with the snort package on the cf card. Any thoughts? -
As for now RTL8111E won't work with 2.1-RC2 and may not work with 2.1-RELEASE too.
-
Hmm, are you sure?
The 'E' variant usually works with 2.1 though there are several hardware revisions all labeled 8111e.
The F and G variants are unsupported I believe.Steve
-
Hmm, are you sure?
The 'E' variant usually works with 2.1 though there are several hardware revisions all labeled 8111e.
The F and G variants are unsupported I believe.Steve
-
You mean the 8111E?
Steve
-
Yeah, my fault I meant RTL8111G isn't working.
RTL8111E works awesome with 2.1 as I have this setup currently myself in a Shuttle DS61 (with squid, havp and snort).
-
I have the same Problem. the RTL8111G isn't working in any FreeBSD Kernel - including FreeBSD 10-ALPHA :'( I hope it will coming soon a solution for the Realtek RTL8111G NICs.
Yeah, my fault I meant RTL8111G isn't working.
-
I once made the mistake of buying a ATOM board with dual onboard realtek NICS without checking for support. ONCE - Never again.
I ended up not using the onboard NICS and just plugging a Intel card into it. Its supported now as of a couple days ago, but I'll probably stay on the add-on intel card since its been super reliable.
-
For anyone not following the 'G' thread a much newer driver is now available to test here: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,65355.msg365028.html#msg365028
Steve
