Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    What are thes errors?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    13 Posts 6 Posters 5.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      doktornotor Banned
      last edited by

      System - Advanced - Networking - Firewall/NAT - Firewall Maximum Table Entries

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F Offline
        Fmslick
        last edited by

        ok… now what?

        it say

        Maximum number of table entries for systems such as aliases, sshlockout, snort, etc, combined.
        Note: Leave this blank for the default. On your system the default size is: 200000

        We all start same where

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          doktornotor Banned
          last edited by

          Bump it higher, of course!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            Fmslick
            last edited by

            higher than 200000  :o never had this issue in 2.0.3 , why now with the newer one?

            Modify:
            I did set them to 500000 and i am still getting the errors

            We all start same where

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ? Offline
              A Former User
              last edited by

              FWIW (not much nowadays) I'm running 10mil (10,000,000) for max table entries.

              Cannot allocate memory (shown in the error) means "for some reason, despite all my extra-zealous efforts, I could not pick up and store that large amount of data in my memory. This could be due to the memory being too small (editor's note: too few table entries is exactly this) or the data being too large."

              Barring a bug, it's either too few entries or out of ram. That or a RAM module got fried during reboot. Disclaimer: "barring a bug" in the context of this post means: assuming that a bug (a programming error) does NOT exist in any way and/or shape and/or form, in the pfblocker package and/or pfsense as a whole, taking into consideration that it (pfsense) is a collection of many different programs. Neither party should be held liable for the possible existence of this bug.

              If 500000 seems large, wait until ipv6 is here.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                doktornotor Banned
                last edited by

                @Fmslick:

                I did set them to 500000 and i am still getting the errors

                Not high enough. You realize you are trying to block billions of people? Alternatively, you of course are free to stop using similar insane (and no longer updated either) blocklists.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K Offline
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  Its too bad you can only thank someone once…
                  Some packages should have warnings like medicine:

                  Warning use of this package may cause side effects including but not limited blindness from reading forums all day, horse throat from screaming, baldness from pulling out hair, loss of family from becoming totally distracted by broken router, irritated forum members, bankrupcy from buying excessive hardware to solve a software problem or even death due to fatigue, loss of sleep and eventual suicide.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    jwelter99
                    last edited by

                    @doktornotor:

                    @Fmslick:

                    I did set them to 500000 and i am still getting the errors

                    Not high enough. You realize you are trying to block billions of people? Alternatively, you of course are free to stop using similar insane (and no longer updated either) blocklists.

                    As a hijack - what block lists do you suggest and package to apply them?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @kejianshi:

                      Its too bad you can only thank someone once…
                      Some packages should have warnings like medicine:

                      Warning use of this package may cause side effects including but not limited blindness from reading forums all day, horse throat from screaming, baldness from pulling out hair, loss of family from becoming totally distracted by broken router, irritated forum members, bankrupcy from buying excessive hardware to solve a software problem or even death due to fatigue, loss of sleep and eventual suicide.

                      I get the bolded parts when I'm trying to explain that snort is not the end all be all, top of the line, tomorrow's technology implemented today, Intrusion Detection System on these forums. Yes it has it's uses and for most people it's all they need.

                      Back on topic, there is a topic in these very forums, named "RFC (make up a number not in use) - Blueprint for setting up snort + pfblocker" written by an insane guy trying to help those that don't want to listen. In it there are the pfblocker lists one should use.

                      Since this IS the facebook generation time, here is the link for those that don't bother searching anymore: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,64674.html

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K Offline
                        kejianshi
                        last edited by

                        I'm not irritated - Forums are more entertaining that Reality TV and simultaneously useful.
                        Got it working?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Offline
                          packetsTObananas
                          last edited by

                          I know this thread is old, but changing the default value under  System - Advanced - Networking - Firewall/NAT - Firewall Maximum Table Entries to 1,000,000 worked for me.  8)

                          The box said "Requires Windows 95 or better." I can't understand why it won't work on my Linux computer.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F Offline
                            Fmslick
                            last edited by

                            @packetsTObananas:

                            I know this thread is old, but changing the default value under  System - Advanced - Networking - Firewall/NAT - Firewall Maximum Table Entries to 1,000,000 worked for me.  8)

                            Happy my n00b topic could help haha  ::)

                            We all start same where

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.