Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Current status of ARM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    18 Posts 13 Posters 15.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      "looks" being the key word. Lots of pretty pictures and words but no info on pricing or much of substance there.

      If it actually shows up, and it's actually affordable (<$500), perhaps, but Atom/i3 systems are cheap these days, it would have to be an extremely inexpensive ARM device to make any kind of sense.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stan-qazS
        stan-qaz
        last edited by

        More details on the Utilite box:  http://www.zdnet.com/meet-utilite-new-raspberry-pi-rival-7000018083/

        Lots of RAM, decent processor and dual gig ports WiFi n all at the $100 US price-point.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kejianshi
          last edited by

          "ARM is officially a Tier 2 architecture, as the FreeBSD project does not provide official releases or pre-built packages for this platform due to it primarily targeting the embedded arena. However, FreeBSD/ARM is being actively developed and maintained, is well supported, and provides an excellent framework for building ARM-based systems."

          So says the FreeBSD gods…

          I read this, taken as a whole, as not terribly well supported.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dhatz
            last edited by

            On a related topic of pfSense on MIPS, I noticed this post in the freebsd-net mailing list:

            Thanks to the hard work by FreeBSD's Cavium developers and the community we now have support for the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite boxes in FreeBSD-CURRENT and they're working quite well. Since the devs are bit busy with other projects I though I'd put up an open request of making the octe driver ALTQ aware. This would be a very nice addition to a cheap FreeBSD firewall/gateway that performs well overall. Unfortunately I'm not able to do it myself due to lack of knowledge of the inner workings but it seems quite easy looking at the old patch archive over here:
            http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/ALTQ_driver/
            If needed I can on the other hand test patches.

            http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-July/036066.html

            Relevant links:
            https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/mips/Octeon
            http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax
            http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_Lite_DS.pdf

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              wallabybob
              last edited by

              There is more on the utilite at http://linuxgizmos.com/compact-mini-pc-arm-linux-android-freescale-i-mx6/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Both of the other links for the Utilite are full of hope/promise and then vague ideas about when it will actually ship. Wake me when the thing actually ships at the claimed price point…

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  Sabrewarrior
                  last edited by

                  What about routers themselves? There are some new ARM products out there which are already sub $100 with really nice specs. There are also some MIPS ones but they usually have less flash.

                  WZR-1750DHP:
                  Chipset: Broadcom BCM4708@800MHz
                  RAM: 512 MB
                  Flash: 128 MB
                  Price: $147.99

                  WZR-600DHP2:
                  Chipset: Broadcom BCM4707@800MHz
                  RAM: 256 MB
                  Flash: 128 MB
                  Price: $97.99

                  RT-AC56U
                  Chipset: Broadcom BCM4708A0@1000 MHz
                  RAM: 256 MB
                  Flash: 128 MB
                  Price: $159.99

                  http://www.broadcom.com/products/Wireless-LAN/802.11-Wireless-LAN-Solutions/BCM4707-4708-4709
                  "At the center of the device is a high-performance 1 GHz ARM® Cortex™-A9 dual-core"

                  As for MIPS some of the more powerful ones out there are:
                  RT-AC66R
                  Chipset: Broadcom BCM4706@600
                  RAM: 256 MB
                  Flash: 128 MB
                  Price: $149.99

                  WZR-600DHP
                  Chipset: Atheros AR7161@680
                  RAM: 128
                  Flash: 32
                  Price: $69.99
                  With that much flash though would need some serious tinkering. Not sure if anything from the previous project on Routerstation Pro would be relevant.

                  http://www.broadcom.com/products/Wireless-LAN/802.11-Wireless-LAN-Solutions/BCM4706
                  "BCM4706 integrates a powerful 600 MHz MIPS32"

                  Build times can't be that bad with those specs and the ability to use a USB or 2.

                  PS. I have a WZR-600DHP that I can spend some time on if I had an idea of where to start.

                  Blog of my random experiments

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Have you looked at ZRouter? http://zrouter.org/
                    It looked like a very promising project for some time but now seems a little stale. Could just be my impression.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      robi
                      last edited by

                      I have a GuruPlug laying around. It's also an ARM box, with two gigabit ports, WiFi, eSata, etc:

                      CPU 	1.2 GHz ARM Marvell Kirkwood 6281 (ARM9E)
                      Memory 	512MB SDRAM
                      Storage	512MB NAND
                      MicroSD Slot
                      Connectivity 	USB 2.0, 2 x Gigabit Ethernet, JTAG (serial console with adapter), Bluetooth 2.1, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
                      Dimensions 	95 x 65 x 48.5 (mm)
                      

                      Could also be a good candidate.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Z
                        ZGruk
                        last edited by

                        The utilite box is now available for order by the general public
                        http://utilite-computer.com/web/order-utilite-direct
                        A bit of a lead time, but apparently it is actually coming.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          grdk
                          last edited by

                          For not much more than the high-end Utilite, you can get a dual core Atom mITX box that has actual PCIe NICs (albeit RealTek).

                          Does the Utilite have PCIe NICs?  Or is it off of USB 2.0 like the Pi? I have a few Pis laying around for tinkering, such as a BitTorrent Sync dongle and a Transmission/BT dongle… but I can't imagine using one as a Firewall/IDF/IPS.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Looks like they're not USB connected:

                            Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stan-qazS
                              stan-qaz
                              last edited by

                              I'm not very impressed by this but it is a tiny computer with an Intel processor that you might be able to get pfSense running on instead of waiting on an ARM port.

                              http://linuxgizmos.com/intel-launches-arduino-compatible-galileo-board/

                              http://www.intel.com/support/galileo/index.htm

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kejianshi
                                last edited by

                                Looks like a good low power board for people who value power efficiency over out-right performance.

                                Although this would be a no-go for me:  Processor — Intel Quark X1000 SoC @ 400MHz

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  ayah
                                  last edited by

                                  @stan-qaz:

                                  I'm not very impressed by this but it is a tiny computer with an Intel processor that you might be able to get pfSense running on instead of waiting on an ARM port.

                                  http://linuxgizmos.com/intel-launches-arduino-compatible-galileo-board/

                                  http://www.intel.com/support/galileo/index.htm

                                  If it's combatting the arduino, it's not going to be very powerful. comparable to the ARM m# series IP.
                                  in comparison, routers are usually based on A# series IP

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.