Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Jetway box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    8 Posts 2 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      poly_s
      last edited by

      Hello.

      I've been using pfsense at home providing openvpn when on the road and all the other good stuff that pfsence makes easy.

      The beige box its been running on has bitten the dust. I'm looking at this Jetway box to buy for my new set up.

      http://jetwaycomputer.com/JBC373F38.html

      What do you think? If no one can see any problems then I'm going to get it.

      Thanks in advance for your time.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jasonlitka
        last edited by

        That's pretty old hardware.  Several generations behind the newest Atoms.  Being a 3.5" SBC it's probably not very cost-effective either.

        I can break anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          poly_s
          last edited by

          when you say cost effective do you mean power consumption?

          It has four eth ports so i can set up a network for home and one for my wifes work computers.

          what would you suggest as a better option?

          thanks for your input.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jasonlitka
            last edited by

            No, I mean cost-effective, as in price paid. It's probably the same price or a bit higher than a. current Atom.

            You haven't said anything about your requirements (throughput, number of ports, packages, users, etc.) so a recommendation isn't really possible.

            I can break anything.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              poly_s
              last edited by

              I was running pfsense on a pentium 4 so as long as thisjetwaybox runs pfsense faster than the old box i should be happy.

              I like the 4 ports and at 250 bones the price is right.

              Its basically for just a few users and a vpn for one.

              thx

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jasonlitka
                last edited by

                @poly_s:

                I was running pfsense on a pentium 4 so as long as thisjetwaybox runs pfsense faster than the old box i should be happy.

                I like the 4 ports and at 250 bones the price is right.

                Its basically for just a few users and a vpn for one.

                thx

                It will certainly have lower power consumption, but it might be faster and it might not be.  The Atom 330 is pretty slow.  See the link below for a Tom's Hardware article on the 230, D510 (5-10% faster than a 330, mostly due to a small bump in clock speed), and a pair of P4 CPUs.

                http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/atom-d510-pentium-4-nettop,2649.html

                Depending on your VPN throughput requirements neither may work well for you.

                I can break anything.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  poly_s
                  last edited by

                  interesting

                  thanks for this article.

                  looks like the atom in this jetway is better in most of the catagories i'm conserned with.

                  shame my p4 died but i guess the electricity bill will go down.

                  any thoughts on the realtex nics?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jasonlitka
                    last edited by

                    @poly_s:

                    any thoughts on the realtex nics?

                    Realtek 10/100 NICs are absolute trash.  Their Gig-E NICs are a bit better but I still feel strongly enough about them to say "crap". That said, I've used them in the past and they'll get the job done as long as you don't need more than a few hundred Mbit/s of throughput.

                    I can break anything.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.