Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware questions do to poor routing speed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    20 Posts 4 Posters 2.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      So this box has 2 realtek and 3 intel NICs yes?

      The on board NICs may be on a separate bus in which case you may see different results between different NICs. Which are you testing between? How is your lagg interface configured?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        armsby
        last edited by

        Current setup is
        1 realtek
        3 intel

        the onboard nic (realtek) and 1 intel on the daughter board is in lagg0

        laggproto lacp
        laggport: em1 flags=1c <active,collecting,distributing>laggport: re0 flags=1c <active,collecting,distributing>1 internet connection on em0 (100Mb)
        1 internet connection on em2 (500Mb)

        test between em2 and lagg0.</active,collecting,distributing></active,collecting,distributing>

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Ok. The lagg is only giving you redundancy in that setup, it's probably slowet than a single NIC.
          Try running 'pciconf -lv' to check if they are all on the same bus.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            armsby
            last edited by

            output:
            re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x816810ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
                class      = network
                subclass  = ethernet
            em0@pci0:2:4:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                class      = network
                subclass  = ethernet
            em1@pci0:2:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                class      = network
                subclass  = ethernet
            em2@pci0:2:7:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                class      = network
                subclass  = ethernet

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Ok so the Intel NICs are on bus 2 and the realtek on bus 1. Additionally the realtek device is pci-e and the Intel NICs are pci. It does depend how those buses are connected upstream.
              Try removing lagg and using using just re0 for LAN.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                armsby
                last edited by

                when breaking lagg and using re0 as the inside network I was able to pill close to 300Mbps and the cpu usages for the wan interface hit 73%

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Ah, some improvement then. Is that 75% overall CPU usage?
                  It would be interesting to see the per core usage. The 330 isn't much below the d510 in performance terms and that can manage 485Mbps. That is between PCIe Intel NICs though.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    armsby
                    last edited by

                    It is not overall it is on a single core, I will see i I can catch a dump of the load later today

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      armsby
                      last edited by

                      im starting to wonder if there is a bad network interface in this box as this morning I can do about 224Mbps but there is no cpu load

                      11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K CPU3    3 493:00 100.00% idle{idle: cpu3}
                        11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K RUN    2 490:23 95.17% idle{idle: cpu2}
                        11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K CPU1    1 492:19 79.30% idle{idle: cpu1}
                        11 root    171 ki31    0K    32K CPU0    0 462:42 56.88% idle{idle: cpu0}
                          0 root    -68    0    0K  128K -      0  5:19 44.48% kernel{em2 taskq}
                        12 root    -68    -    0K  200K WAIT    0  16:14 26.46% intr{irq256: re0}

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, well it's clearly not the CPU that's restricting your throughput.
                        Perhaps try disabling hyperthreading in the BIOS since it's clearly not using the virtual cores usefully.
                        You could also try disabling anything you're not using in the BIOS, sound card, parallel port etc. One of this devices could be slowing the bus.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          armsby
                          last edited by

                          That did not help, everything has been disabled, still only about 220-300Mbps and cpu load not over 50%

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jasonlitka
                            last edited by

                            @armsby:

                            That did not help, everything has been disabled, still only about 220-300Mbps and cpu load not over 50%

                            With HT disabled you're fully tapping a core at 50% (which you might see as 70/30, 50/50, 90/10, etc.).  I'm still going to go with that's the cap for a 330, particularly since that's the same cap I hit a few years back.

                            I can break anything.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.