Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel Quad NIC not working in pfsense 2.1

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    39 Posts 17 Posters 18.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Aluminum
      last edited by

      I fixed your post ;)

      I'd have to check but last I heard it had been quite some time since the last known VLAN hopping bug/firmware/backdoor in closed source firmware ultimately in full control of network traffic.

      I can't be alone in choosing mostly verifiable software like pfsense to keep evil networks separate from ones I own because the commercial market has continued to fail us. That it happens to often be cheaper to use and more powerful in the right hands is pure icing on the cake.
      If you're going through the trouble to run pfsense over an off the shelf black box and then throw something in front of it that defeats one of the main benefits in the first place, why bother at all?

      That said, for most it's "good enough", though not ideal.

      "Good enough" electrical wiring burns down houses and gets insurance claims denied, I can't in good conscience recommend or condone the same in the IT world just because our voltages are lower and the "fires" do virtual damage instead :)

      Ok I digress,

      Edit: I just remembered that I updated the ROM on the card. I used UEFI, since I wasn't sure what to choose. Does that matter at all? Should I choose PXE instead?

      Yeah try the PXE option, can't hurt.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Time for a switch with open source firmware?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          Aluminum
          last edited by

          @stephenw10:

          Time for a switch with open source firmware?

          Steve

          Thats actually starting to become a possible option at the high end, if you need 10/40GbE and got some cash to burn :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            TommyL
            last edited by

            Okay, I just forked up $124 for a new mini-itx board…the Gigabyte GA-H61N-USB3. H61 chipset, and PCIe 2.0, instead of 3.0. Card is not recognised  >:(

            I really dont get why this card is not working on mini-itx boards. I have three other ATX and micro ATX boards in which the card works fine. Is this card not working at all on the mini-itx platform?

            Regards

            Tommy

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              littlebi
              last edited by

              Do I understand that you want to use an 1155 Socket board for a firewall solution. Aint that a little overpowered??
              Why don't you use something like an Intel D2500CCE Atom Mini-ITX Mainboard. It basically has everything that you need for a firewall solution.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                @littlebi:

                Do I understand that you want to use an 1155 Socket board for a firewall solution. Aint that a little overpowered??
                Why don't you use something like an Intel D2500CCE Atom Mini-ITX Mainboard. It basically has everything that you need for a firewall solution.

                Lose two serial ports and DVI and gimme more gigabitz.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  TommyL
                  last edited by

                  @littlebi:

                  Do I understand that you want to use an 1155 Socket board for a firewall solution. Aint that a little overpowered??
                  Why don't you use something like an Intel D2500CCE Atom Mini-ITX Mainboard. It basically has everything that you need for a firewall solution.

                  Yeah, I know, but I always like to have some extra power, and also be a little future proof.

                  And I really HATE to have to give up on something…so now I want it to work more than ever...u know the feeling i'm sure :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    littlebi
                    last edited by

                    I'm pretty sure about it, but IF it is home use, and you use a motherboard that has a slot has a pci Express X16 slot that could run a nice graphic card for gaming is a waste. If that slot would have been a pci slot then I COULD understand. But this is way too overpowered.
                    It is as if you use a tank to squash the fly.

                    And this is no criticism, I do understand what you are saying very well. But you will NEVER meet the full computational requirements of the CPU in routing and firewalling.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      @littlebi:

                      Do I understand that you want to use an 1155 Socket board for a firewall solution. Aint that a little overpowered??

                      Not necessarily at all.
                      There are many, many CPUs that can fit a socket 1155 motherboard from the most basic G1610 Celeron right up to a screaming quad core i7. That gives you a lot of flexibility and upgradability.
                      The Atom CPUs are great but there are plenty of scenarios where you will run of CPU power quickly. It's unlikely you'll more need more for a home broadband connection (unless you have Google fibre!) if you're using just firewall and NAT. If you need to run a VPN you may well have more WAN bandwidth than you can use. If you have several internal interfaces your traffic between them will be limited below gigabit wire speed.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L
                        littlebi
                        last edited by

                        I totally agree but look at the board, case principle of a firewall is to filter traffic on one interface and let  it out on the other. This board has only 1 interface and no possibility to add another one. So how is it going to be usefull still stephenw10?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          It has a PCIe slot in which the subject of this thread, a quad port NIC, was intended to go. 5 interfaces total. Could also use VLAN  interfaces as well. Seems reasonable to me. The fact that the NIC didn't work is unfortunate.  ::)

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            pftdm007
                            last edited by

                            To the OP:  have you got the quad port (39y6138) working with pfsense 2.1 yet???

                            Looking to get one on fleebay but I found this thread before I bought the controller so i'd like to know if it works..

                            Cheers!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T
                              TommyL
                              last edited by

                              Oh yes, its working great. But not on any of the three lga1155 boards I have tested it on..its not recognised by the boards. But it's currently running perfectly fine on an older lga755 board.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                Darkk
                                last edited by

                                @TommyL:

                                Oh yes, its working great. But not on any of the three lga1155 boards I have tested it on..its not recognised by the boards. But it's currently running perfectly fine on an older lga755 board.

                                It's been mentioned that newer motherboards with UEFI may be the cause for it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  TommyL
                                  last edited by

                                  But one of the lga1155 boards, a Gigabyte z68x-ud3h-b3, did not have an UEFI bios…and still wouldn't recognise it...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    Manes
                                    last edited by

                                    Having this same exact problem with my new setup. BIOSTAR NM70I-847 motherboard and an Intel 4 port NIC. Boards got a soldered on Celeron 847 w/ NM70 chipset, NIC is a Intel Pro/1000 PT. Any one else having this same problem?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      Manes
                                      last edited by

                                      bump

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        moto211
                                        last edited by

                                        @TommyL:

                                        But one of the lga1155 boards, a Gigabyte z68x-ud3h-b3, did not have an UEFI bios…and still wouldn't recognise it...

                                        That boards absolutely has an UEFI. All intel chipsets 6 series or later have UEFI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          Keljian
                                          last edited by

                                          also having this problem - any potential solutions?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • T
                                            TommyL
                                            last edited by

                                            @moto211:

                                            @TommyL:

                                            But one of the lga1155 boards, a Gigabyte z68x-ud3h-b3, did not have an UEFI bios…and still wouldn't recognise it...

                                            That boards absolutely has an UEFI. All intel chipsets 6 series or later have UEFI.

                                            Oh, is that right. Okay, I did not know this. Thanks.

                                            As a side note, I ended up getting a I350 T4 card from Ebay instead. Working great on my ASUS P8H77-I motherboard! :)

                                            Regards

                                            Tommy

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.