Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Opinions Needed SSD vs HD vs CF

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    23 Posts 6 Posters 4.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      newbieuser1234
      last edited by

      thanks so much

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rjcrowder
        last edited by

        I'm one of the pfSense users who has had a couple of SSD failures… Pretty sure it wad due to buying cheap SSD's though. I haven't had a problem since I put in a quality SSD (Intel). Likewise, TRIM support in 2.1 will help

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          newbieuser1234
          last edited by

          Would you recommend CF nano install over SSD? Or did you ever go back to HDD?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            CF is great if you have a CF slot already in your box, it's cheap and easy. But… I would only ever run the Nano variant from CF.
            There are people running a full install from a flash drive but I personally don't think it's worth the risk.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              newbieuser1234
              last edited by

              I have been running the nanobsd install for months with a limited snort rule set and it appears to be fine? any thoughts?  the nanobsd install is read only correct?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Probably good to go then.  ;)
                As I said it's been a while since I had that trouble (it couldn't fetch new signitures as I recall).
                NanoBSD is mounted read-only, correct.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  newbieuser1234
                  last edited by

                  I just want snort mainly for the port scanning blocking at WAN.  Is anyone else hesitant to do the 2.1 upgrade for nano given the apinger issue? Doesn't seem like it's been resolved either. I can't use openvpn with 2.1 nano.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    I am running 2.1 Nano on all my boxes. I have not seen any problems with apinger, I am using OpenVPN on at least one box.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      newbieuser1234
                      last edited by

                      Do they have static IPs for WAN?  Both boxes I did the 2.1 upgrade via the dashboard and openvpn crashes out frequently.  I read somewhere it has to do with apinger.  not sure, regardless I can't see to get 2.1 nano to work with openvpn and dhcp.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        PPPoE and DHCP. Neither box running OpenVPN sees much traffic but I've not seen any errors  nonetheless.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          newbieuser1234
                          last edited by

                          Did you do the in place upgrade or install from scratch?  Is it the VGA nano version?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Mostly upgrades but some fresh images. They are all standard Nanobsd using the serial console.

                            Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N
                              newbieuser1234
                              last edited by

                              mine are all vga.  can you install a serial console version, if you assign one of the interfaces as a serial port? probably not right?  are you using the alix board?  i just did a fresh install of 2.1 vga and vpn / apinger is working fine now.  i'll keep you posted to see how it goes.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                No the serial port has to be a real serial port, it's hardcoded into Nano when it's built.
                                I'm using all re-purposed Watchguard boxes.

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.