Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Ubiquiti edgerouter lite support?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    66 Posts 26 Posters 55.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      @PorFavor:

      Hey guys, it's easy to get FreeBSD on there and it runs okay, see http://rtfm.net/FreeBSD/ERL

      Note that the work is based on FreeBSD 10.
      Note that pfSense 2.2 is based on FreeBSD 10.

      Would you like fries with that?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        @midwesttech:

        Someone was able to get FreeBSD running on Ubiquiti's Edgerouter Lite:

        http://bsdfeed.com/discussion/180344/ubiquiti-edgerouter-lite-works-multi-user-with-current-

        Nice! though it sounds like it may still be a ways away from actually being in a state that could run pfSense. His install process seems a bit complex […]

        FYI, Juli Mallett (http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/) is female.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stan-qazS
          stan-qaz
          last edited by

          I'm looking forward to the port, I'm fooling with mine now that I got the latest firmware into it and there are many missing features and aggravations compared to pfSense.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            You teasing the forum again Gonzopancho?  ;)
            Support for alternative architectures, of any sort, is awesome. It will be very interesting to see how this performs without the FPGA/proprietary module. The link above gives just one figure for anything: 112Mbps over a single NIC. No doubt that could be improved with some polishing. Looking forward to more results…  :)

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              PorFavor
              last edited by

              Gonzopacho, I did not mean to offend you, very sorry if I did. I only posted the link for the guy who said it was hard to install and anyone else interested, not to impugn your hard work in any way.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                phil.davis
                last edited by

                Thanks gonzo, I didn't mean to imply that there was any rush or pressure, and I do understand those FreeBSD 10 pfSense 2.2 issues - there would be completely no point in even attempting to backport such a thing to FreeBSD 8.3 pfSense 2.1! I had just looked at the hardware specs and particularly noticed the wide range DC input of the bottom-end box.

                As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  everyone, I'm not offended.

                  Potentially, things won't be too bad:

                  http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Tolly-report/m-p/328234/highlight/true#M1794

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    PorFavor
                    last edited by

                    Could you tell a little bit more what you know about the hardware crypto support? I installed FreeBSD on mine and /dev/crypto seems to speed up AES by 2x. Is there more hardware on there that needs support? Or only more proprietary/FPGA stuff or something?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      2X seems pretty good.  It depends on what you hand to the processor, of course.

                      I have the timings for a CN5230-700-SCP (similar, but 4 cores, instead of the 2 core in the ERL) handy:

                      % ./cryptotest -d cryptocteon -a aes 131072 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384 65536
                        2.660 sec,  262144    aes crypts,      16 bytes,  1576866 byte/sec,    12.0 Mb/sec
                        2.704 sec,  262144    aes crypts,      32 bytes,  3102746 byte/sec,    23.7 Mb/sec
                        2.631 sec,  262144    aes crypts,      64 bytes,  6376600 byte/sec,    48.6 Mb/sec
                        3.015 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    128 bytes, 11127423 byte/sec,    84.9 Mb/sec
                        3.294 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    256 bytes, 20374218 byte/sec,  155.4 Mb/sec
                        3.896 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    512 bytes, 34448261 byte/sec,  262.8 Mb/sec
                        5.240 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    1024 bytes, 51225481 byte/sec,  390.8 Mb/sec
                        7.921 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    2048 bytes, 67775915 byte/sec,  517.1 Mb/sec
                        13.078 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    4096 bytes, 82104791 byte/sec,  626.4 Mb/sec
                        34.394 sec,  262144    aes crypts,    8192 bytes, 62437704 byte/sec,  476.4 Mb/sec
                        61.838 sec,  262144    aes crypts,  16384 bytes, 69454744 byte/sec,  529.9 Mb/sec
                      222.462 sec,  262144    aes crypts,  65536 bytes, 77226068 byte/sec,  589.2 Mb/sec

                      % ./cryptotest -d cryptocteon  -z 10000
                        0.207 sec,  20000    des crypts,      8 bytes,  771672 byte/sec,    5.9 Mb/sec
                        0.204 sec,  20000    des crypts,      16 bytes,  1569074 byte/sec,    12.0 Mb/sec
                        0.207 sec,  20000    des crypts,      32 bytes,  3090802 byte/sec,    23.6 Mb/sec
                        0.204 sec,  20000    des crypts,      64 bytes,  6280452 byte/sec,    47.9 Mb/sec
                        0.231 sec,  20000    des crypts,    128 bytes, 11065772 byte/sec,    84.4 Mb/sec
                        0.261 sec,  20000    des crypts,    256 bytes, 19648853 byte/sec,  149.9 Mb/sec
                        0.316 sec,  20000    des crypts,    512 bytes, 32406704 byte/sec,  247.2 Mb/sec
                        0.437 sec,  20000    des crypts,    1024 bytes, 46846443 byte/sec,  357.4 Mb/sec
                        0.683 sec,  20000    des crypts,    2048 bytes, 59981783 byte/sec,  457.6 Mb/sec
                        1.149 sec,  20000    des crypts,    4096 bytes, 71267814 byte/sec,  543.7 Mb/sec
                        2.934 sec,  20000    des crypts,    8192 bytes, 55844823 byte/sec,  426.1 Mb/sec
                        0.209 sec,  20000  3des crypts,      8 bytes,  766956 byte/sec,    5.9 Mb/sec
                        0.210 sec,  20000  3des crypts,      16 bytes,  1523084 byte/sec,    11.6 Mb/sec
                        0.209 sec,  20000  3des crypts,      32 bytes,  3065589 byte/sec,    23.4 Mb/sec
                        0.210 sec,  20000  3des crypts,      64 bytes,  6088686 byte/sec,    46.5 Mb/sec
                        0.238 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    128 bytes, 10757704 byte/sec,    82.1 Mb/sec
                        0.267 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    256 bytes, 19188391 byte/sec,  146.4 Mb/sec
                        0.322 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    512 bytes, 31841588 byte/sec,  242.9 Mb/sec
                        0.438 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    1024 bytes, 46730998 byte/sec,  356.5 Mb/sec
                        0.681 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    2048 bytes, 60152408 byte/sec,  458.9 Mb/sec
                        1.148 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    4096 bytes, 71336390 byte/sec,  544.3 Mb/sec
                        2.931 sec,  20000  3des crypts,    8192 bytes, 55898496 byte/sec,  426.5 Mb/sec
                        0.204 sec,  20000    aes crypts,      16 bytes,  1568774 byte/sec,    12.0 Mb/sec
                        0.204 sec,  20000    aes crypts,      32 bytes,  3139240 byte/sec,    24.0 Mb/sec
                        0.205 sec,  20000    aes crypts,      64 bytes,  6231986 byte/sec,    47.5 Mb/sec
                        0.230 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    128 bytes, 11135373 byte/sec,    85.0 Mb/sec
                        0.253 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    256 bytes, 20260538 byte/sec,  154.6 Mb/sec
                        0.299 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    512 bytes, 34257345 byte/sec,  261.4 Mb/sec
                        0.401 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    1024 bytes, 51065570 byte/sec,  389.6 Mb/sec
                        0.603 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    2048 bytes, 67874353 byte/sec,  517.8 Mb/sec
                        0.996 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    4096 bytes, 82248583 byte/sec,  627.5 Mb/sec
                        2.628 sec,  20000    aes crypts,    8192 bytes, 62340145 byte/sec,  475.6 Mb/sec
                        0.210 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,      16 bytes,  1524238 byte/sec,    11.6 Mb/sec
                        0.208 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,      32 bytes,  3073451 byte/sec,    23.4 Mb/sec
                        0.209 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,      64 bytes,  6117903 byte/sec,    46.7 Mb/sec
                        0.236 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    128 bytes, 10838364 byte/sec,    82.7 Mb/sec
                        0.258 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    256 bytes, 19828438 byte/sec,  151.3 Mb/sec
                        0.310 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    512 bytes, 33049209 byte/sec,  252.1 Mb/sec
                        0.414 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    1024 bytes, 49462745 byte/sec,  377.4 Mb/sec
                        0.632 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    2048 bytes, 64853636 byte/sec,  494.8 Mb/sec
                        1.044 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    4096 bytes, 78501044 byte/sec,  598.9 Mb/sec
                        2.720 sec,  20000 aes192 crypts,    8192 bytes, 60235516 byte/sec,  459.6 Mb/sec
                        0.208 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,      16 bytes,  1537796 byte/sec,    11.7 Mb/sec
                        0.209 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,      32 bytes,  3059829 byte/sec,    23.3 Mb/sec
                        0.205 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,      64 bytes,  6236449 byte/sec,    47.6 Mb/sec
                        0.232 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    128 bytes, 11014922 byte/sec,    84.0 Mb/sec
                        0.262 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    256 bytes, 19547506 byte/sec,  149.1 Mb/sec
                        0.316 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    512 bytes, 32439453 byte/sec,  247.5 Mb/sec
                        0.427 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    1024 bytes, 47990177 byte/sec,  366.1 Mb/sec
                        0.655 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    2048 bytes, 62559948 byte/sec,  477.3 Mb/sec
                        1.090 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    4096 bytes, 75147759 byte/sec,  573.3 Mb/sec
                        2.807 sec,  20000 aes256 crypts,    8192 bytes, 58366681 byte/sec,  445.3 Mb/sec
                        0.105 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,      8 bytes,  760948 byte/sec,    5.8 Mb/sec
                        0.104 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,      16 bytes,  1542124 byte/sec,    11.8 Mb/sec
                        0.097 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,      32 bytes,  3302305 byte/sec,    25.2 Mb/sec
                        0.110 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,      64 bytes,  5832445 byte/sec,    44.5 Mb/sec
                        0.117 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    128 bytes, 10968107 byte/sec,    83.7 Mb/sec
                        0.128 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    256 bytes, 20050753 byte/sec,  153.0 Mb/sec
                        0.155 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    512 bytes, 33073226 byte/sec,  252.3 Mb/sec
                        0.209 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    1024 bytes, 49065644 byte/sec,  374.3 Mb/sec
                        0.318 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    2048 bytes, 64374782 byte/sec,  491.1 Mb/sec
                        0.961 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    4096 bytes, 42634158 byte/sec,  325.3 Mb/sec
                        1.505 sec,  10000    md5 crypts,    8192 bytes, 54440322 byte/sec,  415.3 Mb/sec
                        0.103 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,      8 bytes,  774646 byte/sec,    5.9 Mb/sec
                        0.098 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,      16 bytes,  1630590 byte/sec,    12.4 Mb/sec
                        0.098 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,      32 bytes,  3280167 byte/sec,    25.0 Mb/sec
                        0.109 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,      64 bytes,  5893132 byte/sec,    45.0 Mb/sec
                        0.116 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    128 bytes, 11046386 byte/sec,    84.3 Mb/sec
                        0.126 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    256 bytes, 20372920 byte/sec,  155.4 Mb/sec
                        0.152 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    512 bytes, 33646801 byte/sec,  256.7 Mb/sec
                        0.201 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    1024 bytes, 50823651 byte/sec,  387.8 Mb/sec
                        0.300 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    2048 bytes, 68263254 byte/sec,  520.8 Mb/sec
                        0.921 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    4096 bytes, 44478373 byte/sec,  339.3 Mb/sec
                        1.421 sec,  10000  sha1 crypts,    8192 bytes, 57648975 byte/sec,  439.8 Mb/sec

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        PorFavor
                        last edited by

                        Very cool, thanks.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User
                          last edited by

                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            Klug
                            last edited by

                            Just saw this today: http://rtfm.net/FreeBSD/ERL/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • W
                              wcoolnet
                              last edited by

                              I'd love to see a port for the edgerouter lite. This would be great!!

                              I have a couple of them running and once you get a handle on the CLI commands its not too difficult to setup. Though it is a bit of a learning curve and I would not recommend them to anyone that doesn't feel comfortable learning a new CLI setup system.

                              When they first came out and I first got one I was overly optimistic about the performance numbers and their marketing might be somewhat deceptive in this regard. There are a lot of features in EdgeOS that will disable the offload engine when they are enabled. Some of those things that I have discovered are: dual wan load balancing, bridging two interfaces, QoS traffic shaping, Flow accounting, all of which disable hardware offload.
                              Without the hardware offload it's still a nice little box but it's just not mind blowingly amazing anymore.

                              While I really like the idea of an egderouter port (because I already have them) generally I would just like to see a port for some kind of small low power, fan-less router device in the $100 range that has reasonable performance for SOHO type small networks.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                rjcrowder
                                last edited by

                                @wcoolnet:

                                While I really like the idea of an egderouter port (because I already have them) generally I would just like to see a port for some kind of small low power, fan-less router device in the $100 range that has reasonable performance for SOHO type small networks.

                                While it doesn't exactly meet your requirements - has a small fan - this device from newegg is close http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856205007. I've set one up and it has been running solid for a couple of weeks. Since I added a quieter 40mm fan, the total for the empty box ended up being about $140. With 2GB and a cheap 2.5" drive or SSD you can be out for around $200.

                                I also just ordered an aluminium celeron 1037u box from taobao (see https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=75262.msg411063#msg411063). I'm taking a little chance on that one… but it certainly looks like an nice little box - and it is fanless.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W
                                  wcoolnet
                                  last edited by

                                  Like you said the devices you linked don't really meet my requirements.
                                  Another requirement that I did not mention is a minimum of 3 network ports. Otherwise I need to add in an inexpensive VLAN switch such as the  Mikrotik RB260 and this just adds to the overall cost and complexity of the setup.
                                  I am also not fond of these direct from china boxes and would prefer something from a better known company.
                                  I generally recommend buying two boxes so that a spare is on site and ready to go (cold standby) because it's almost impossible to buy stuff locally anymore. So your solution would be about $500 (with two of the boxes you linked and two managed switched) + $$ for labor at which point my cheap clients start complaining. $200 + labor for the edgerouter solution would be a much easier sell.

                                  Anyway I do NOT want to turn this thread into a discussion on alternatives to the edgerouter. That's what new threads are for.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    Guest
                                    last edited by

                                    @SunCatalyst:

                                    Hope you can still work on this a bit at a time as 2.2 seems a ways off for sure….

                                    2.2 gets closer every day.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • I
                                      iamkinghenry
                                      last edited by

                                      It sounds interesting to try pfSense on an EdgeRouter.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • F
                                        fraglord
                                        last edited by

                                        @PorFavor:

                                        Could you tell a little bit more what you know about the hardware crypto support? I installed FreeBSD on mine and /dev/crypto seems to speed up AES by 2x. Is there more hardware on there that needs support? Or only more proprietary/FPGA stuff or something?

                                        If you (or somebody else) still got FReeBSD running on this device I would like to know some real life experience when using AES-256-CBC for OpenVPN tunnel. I'm stuck at about 7 Mbit/s with stock firmware. A UBNT staff makes the, in my opinion uneducated guess, OpenVPN itself is to blame for poor performance: http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/OpenVPN-site-to-site-speed-limit-10-Mbit/m-p/925934#M36502
                                        Crypto offloading seems on their ToDo list since the release of the product.
                                        So I am curious what speed you get using the crypto h/w running FreeBSD.
                                        Of course I would like to see pfSense as well for this router but I am waiting patiently.

                                        pfSense 2.4.0 (amd64) running on IGEL H710C | 1G RAM | 8G SSD | INTEL PRO/1000 PT Dual NIC

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          gst.freitas
                                          last edited by

                                          any news after the release of the 2.2 version of pfSense?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ?
                                            Guest
                                            last edited by

                                            Knew this was coming, one work day after the release.

                                            Not even mad.  (But not answering.).  :-X

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.