Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New Alix board for 2013

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    265 Posts 69 Posters 261.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      powerrc
      last edited by

      This is way too expensive.
      Intel NUC Kit DCCP847DYE is merely $144 with case/power and , a much more powerful cpu
      what's the point to stick to ALIX still?
      Did I miss something?

      @zatoichi:

      Updated…

      | Board | apu1c4 | $165 | http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1c4.htm | |
      | Enclosure | case1d2redu | $9.3 | http://www.pcengines.ch/case1d2redu.htm | |
      | US Plug | ac12vus | $4.5 | http://www.pcengines.ch/ac12vus.htm | |
      | M-SATA SSD | msata16a | $20 | http://www.pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm | |
      | Wireless Card | wle200nx | $18.7 | http://www.pcengines.ch/wle200nx.htm | |
      | VPN Card | ?? | | | |
      | CPU Info | | | http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Bobcat/AMD-G%20Series%20G-T40E%20-%20GET40EFQB22GVE.html | |
      | Order Page | | | http://www.pcengines.ch/order1.php?c=63124 | |
      | | | $217.5 | | |
      | | Shipping | $44 | | |
      | | | $261.5 | | |

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        Applied
        last edited by

        @powerrc:

        what's the point to stick to ALIX still?
        Did I miss something?

        For starters:

        • SSD / wireless card / RAM:
          Your price point of $144 for the NUC does not include either SSD, RAM or wireless card (not yet supported on pfSense but elsewhere and this is talking about hardware price), while the quoted $217.50 for the APU does include wireless NIC, SSD and 2GB RAM

        • Ethernet ports:
          ALIX / APU features 3 ethernet ports.
          DCCP847DYE kit has only one single ethernet port and there’s no way of adding another one internally (due to the case).
          So how would you go about setting this up as a router? (USB ethernet just plain doesn’t work reliably on pfSense)

        • APU has bootable SD card slot, which can act as even less expensive boot media than SSD

        • APU is fanless while the NUC includes a fan (though, granted, this might also be taken as an advantage in some environments)

        • APU has a serial interface which obviates need for a display

        • APU allows for easier internal installation of supported 3G/4G (e.g. for backup connectivity)

        • APU uses open source BIOS, whereas Intel probably uses some closed source firmware (and can you trust American companions not to put some backdoors in their kit?)

        Don't get me wrong, I think the NUC is an interesting concept and I can see some applications for it - but I don't think it's particularly well-suited for pfSense or any firewalling/gateway use

        @powerrc:

        This is way too expensive.

        I think it depends on how you look at it:
        Its price point may seem steep if compared to consumer-grade hardware in sheer price/performance ratio.
        But it is relatively inexpensive compared to most embedded / network appliance hardware.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • nesenseN
          nesense
          last edited by

          @Applied:

          So how would you go about setting this up as a router? (USB ethernet just plain doesn’t work reliably on pfSense)

          I've been using Apple USB Ethernet Adapters on multiple machines for a couple of years now with zero issues, a bit overpriced (about $30 now) but it works.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GruensFroeschliG
            GruensFroeschli
            last edited by

            @Applied:

            For starters:

            • SSD / wireless card / RAM:
              Your price point of $144 for the NUC does not include either SSD, RAM or wireless card (not yet supported on pfSense but elsewhere and this is talking about hardware price), while the quoted $217.50 for the APU does include wireless NIC, SSD and 2GB RAM

            The quoted board is even the version with 4GB ram.
            The 2 GB version costs about 20$ less.

            We do what we must, because we can.

            Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              p1erre
              last edited by

              ;D just received my apu1c today. Upgrading from alix using export/import configuration worked just fine.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                tirsojrp
                last edited by

                @p1erre:

                ;D just received my apu1c today. Upgrading from alix using export/import configuration worked just fine.

                We want more!!!!!
                Idle/Full load temperatures and power consumption?
                Performance?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  gidi
                  last edited by

                  Moved from alix to an apu1c using a sdhc card (temporarly) and restored a modified alix config.
                  Works nicely so far…

                  FreeBSD/amd64 (test.lan) (console)
                  
                  *** Welcome to pfSense 2.1-RELEASE-nanobsd (amd64) on test ***
                  
                   WAN (wan)       -> re0        -> v4/DHCP4: 192.168.69.139/24
                   BRIDGE (lan)    -> bridge0    -> v4: 192.168.70.1/24
                   WIFI (opt1)     -> ath0_wlan0 ->
                   LAN (opt2)      -> re1        ->
                  
                   0) Logout (SSH only)                  8) Shell
                   1) Assign Interfaces                  9) pfTop
                   2) Set interface(s) IP address       10) Filter Logs
                   3) Reset webConfigurator password    11) Restart webConfigurator
                   4) Reset to factory defaults         12) pfSense Developer Shell
                   5) Reboot system                     13) Upgrade from console
                   6) Halt system                       14) Disable Secure Shell (sshd)
                   7) Ping host                         15) Restore recent configuration
                  
                  Enter an option:
                  
                  

                  dmesg | grep -i cpu
                  CPU: AMD G-T40E Processor (1000.00-MHz K8-class CPU)
                  FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
                  cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
                  cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
                  cpu0: <acpi cpu="">on acpi0
                  cpu1: <acpi cpu="">on acpi0
                  acpi_throttle0: <acpi cpu="" throttling="">on cpu0
                  SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!</acpi></acpi></acpi>

                  sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu'
                  hw.machine: amd64
                  hw.model: AMD G-T40E Processor
                  hw.ncpu: 2
                  hw.machine_arch: amd64

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    MaxPF
                    last edited by

                    With the new APU board and a m-sata ssd I assume that the full install is preferable to the nanobsd, correct?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • nesenseN
                      nesense
                      last edited by

                      @MaxPF:

                      With the new APU board and a m-sata ssd I assume that the full install is preferable to the nanobsd, correct?

                      Tried copying the CF image on SD but didn't boot, also booting from USB CD image failed & which lacks serial output, only memstick-serial then installing to M-SATA worked for me, haven't tried installing on SATA since beta board lacks it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        Clown
                        last edited by

                        @MaxPF:

                        With the new APU board and a m-sata ssd I assume that the full install is preferable to the nanobsd, correct?

                        Yes, I did copy the full Image "pfSense-memstick-serial-2.1-RELEASE-amd64-20130911-1816.img" from a SD Card and this installes the m-sata-ssd.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          Clown
                          last edited by

                          Would be nice to have for the new APU board:

                          • LED Support
                          • Thermal sensors
                          • as mentioned in an other thread (GPU prozessors as crypto device)
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GruensFroeschliG
                            GruensFroeschli
                            last edited by

                            The GPU is not usable.
                            It is disabled with the APU board to save power.

                            We do what we must, because we can.

                            Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              connorxxl
                              last edited by

                              New APU board is really great. Anyone got an idea how to get thermal sensors working? I'd like to check the temperature regularly…

                              Thanks.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • nesenseN
                                nesense
                                last edited by

                                @Clown:

                                @MaxPF:

                                With the new APU board and a m-sata ssd I assume that the full install is preferable to the nanobsd, correct?

                                Yes, I did copy the full Image "pfSense-memstick-serial-2.1-RELEASE-amd64-20130911-1816.img" from a SD Card and this installes the m-sata-ssd.

                                Could you please tell us what you used to copy that image to SD Card? "dd" didn't work for me  ???

                                Installing nanobsd on SD Card would be optimal.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • G
                                  gidi
                                  last edited by

                                  Could you please tell us what you used to copy that image to SD Card? "dd" didn't work for me  ???

                                  Installing nanobsd on SD Card would be optimal.

                                  I used physdiskwrite to write a 2GB nanobsd alix image onto a sdhc card I had on hand, booted the apu with, did a minimum config and restored a modified alix config - done (made only minimum changes after)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    MaxPF
                                    last edited by

                                    @gidi:

                                    Moved from alix to an apu1c using a sdhc card (temporarly) and restored a modified alix config.
                                    Works nicely so far…

                                    FreeBSD/amd64 (test.lan) (console)
                                    
                                    *** Welcome to pfSense 2.1-RELEASE-nanobsd (amd64) on test ***
                                    
                                     WAN (wan)       -> re0        -> v4/DHCP4: 192.168.69.139/24
                                     BRIDGE (lan)    -> bridge0    -> v4: 192.168.70.1/24
                                     WIFI (opt1)     -> ath0_wlan0 ->
                                     LAN (opt2)      -> re1        ->
                                    
                                    

                                    I noticed you are using a wifi card with the apu board. Is it the wle200nx? If so is it working with 2.1?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • G
                                      gidi
                                      last edited by

                                      I noticed you are using a wifi card with the apu board. Is it the wle200nx? If so is it working with 2.1?

                                      Yes its a AR9280 set to run in 802.11g mode only and working so far. Seems not as good as the one I used in the Alix box (sensitivity wise) but it's to early to judge.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        MaxPF
                                        last edited by

                                        @gidi:

                                        I noticed you are using a wifi card with the apu board. Is it the wle200nx? If so is it working with 2.1?

                                        Yes its a AR9280 set to run in 802.11g mode only and working so far. Seems not as good as the one I used in the Alix box (sensitivity wise) but it's to early to judge.

                                        So in G mode is usable without stability issues, good to know.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C
                                          Clown
                                          last edited by

                                          @nesense:

                                          @Clown:

                                          @MaxPF:

                                          With the new APU board and a m-sata ssd I assume that the full install is preferable to the nanobsd, correct?

                                          Yes, I did copy the full Image "pfSense-memstick-serial-2.1-RELEASE-amd64-20130911-1816.img" from a SD Card and this installes the m-sata-ssd.

                                          Could you please tell us what you used to copy that image to SD Card? "dd" didn't work for me  ???

                                          Installing nanobsd on SD Card would be optimal.

                                          I used http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32diskimager/ as physdiskwrite didn't work.
                                          As Image I used the Serial-installer-Image not the nano-Images. During the Installation you have to Chose the kernel, I selected the embedded.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • nesenseN
                                            nesense
                                            last edited by

                                            @MaxPF:

                                            @gidi:

                                            I noticed you are using a wifi card with the apu board. Is it the wle200nx? If so is it working with 2.1?

                                            Yes its a AR9280 set to run in 802.11g mode only and working so far. Seems not as good as the one I used in the Alix box (sensitivity wise) but it's to early to judge.

                                            So in G mode is usable without stability issues, good to know.

                                            It is not usable in G mode here, using the apu1b with pfs 2.1,  most of the time it causes a kernel panic and rebooting hangs.(same with G+N and pure N) other times it says it got enabled but does not broadcast signal. Tried multiple times with fresh installs and leaving defaults under wifi with no luck.

                                            Maybe it's an issue with the beta boards only?  ???

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.