Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Future code branches after 2.1 is released

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    16 Posts 8 Posters 4.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      @AhnHEL:

      @jimp:

      @phil.davis:

      Given the flurry of activity on Redmine and Github in recent days it looks like bits and pieces are being seriously tidied up, ready for a 2.1 release.

      It will be out Very Soon Now™

      So there wont be a RC2?

      Maybe, maybe not. If there is it would only be a tag, probably not any official/formal released set of images.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AhnHELA
        AhnHEL
        last edited by

        @jimp:

        @phil.davis:

        Given the flurry of activity on Redmine and Github in recent days it looks like bits and pieces are being seriously tidied up, ready for a 2.1 release.

        It will be out Very Soon Now™

        Very Soon Now ™

        ;) ;) ;)  8) 8) 8)

        AhnHEL (Angel)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GruensFroeschliG
          GruensFroeschli
          last edited by

          The difference being, that there never was a set release date ;)

          We do what we must, because we can.

          Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            phil.davis
            last edited by

            If there is it would only be a tag, probably not any official/formal released set of images.

            Jim has bumped the tag to 2.1-RC2 - so that will appear on the next snapshot.
            "Very Soon Now" and "Real Soon Now" are [very|real] different things. But which is the soonest? :)

            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AhnHELA
              AhnHEL
              last edited by

              I know it's just a tag but it does feel good.  Another milestone towards RELEASE and beyond…

              So looking forward to pfSense based on FreeBSD 10 for the SMP-friendly PF which I think should be called 3.0 instead of 2.2

              AhnHEL (Angel)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dhatz
                last edited by

                @jimp:

                If all goes according to plan, the jump to FreeBSD 10.x will be better overall, and with most of the focus there rather than many new features, it may be sooner than expected for a release, but it depends on what challenges arise from FreeBSD 10.x in the meantime.

                That's great news, because judging from the feedback, FreeBSD 10.x seems to be noticably better than 8 and 9.

                Btw any progress with the plans to merge some of the pfSense patches back into FreeBSD-HEAD ? I noticed Ermal's posts back in June (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-June/thread.html) but didn't notice any news on that front.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • _Adrian__
                  _Adrian_
                  last edited by

                  Any support for Infiniband / Mellanox based tech ??

                  If it ain't broken, fix it till it is :P

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 3
                    33_viper_33
                    last edited by

                    I would also like to see some infiniband love.  Drivers have traditionally been a big pfsense downfall as 802.11n support is still sketchy at best.  I hope 2.2 will add stable 802.11ac support.  With any luck, the enthusiast community can compile drivers and get a working infiniband solution since the drivers are available under freeBSD 10.

                    I read on another post that there are additional issues with the GUI.  Correct me if I'm wrong, the GUI should have little to do with getting infiniband working.  The IB cards show up as NICs.  The major issue is getting pfsense to support the multiple (Wide) links associated with infiniband and pass the traffic accordingly.

                    My goal is to make a infiniband bridge to other infiniband cards and to 10 and 1 GBE cards.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      @AhnHEL:

                      I know it's just a tag but it does feel good.  Another milestone towards RELEASE and beyond…

                      So looking forward to pfSense based on FreeBSD 10 for the SMP-friendly PF which I think should be called 3.0 instead of 2.2

                      It will be 2.2, as the SMP (and CARP, don't forget CARP) were done such that it is largely transparent to the end-user.

                      3.0 implies an architecture change.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        last edited by

                        @33_viper_33:

                        I would also like to see some infiniband love.  Drivers have traditionally been a big pfsense downfall as 802.11n support is still sketchy at best.  I hope 2.2 will add stable 802.11ac support.  With any luck, the enthusiast community can compile drivers and get a working infiniband solution since the drivers are available under freeBSD 10.

                        I read on another post that there are additional issues with the GUI.  Correct me if I'm wrong, the GUI should have little to do with getting infiniband working.  The IB cards show up as NICs.  The major issue is getting pfsense to support the multiple (Wide) links associated with infiniband and pass the traffic accordingly.

                        My goal is to make a infiniband bridge to other infiniband cards and to 10 and 1 GBE cards.

                        Infiniband:  meh  I'm a lot more interested in more solid support for 10Gb Ethernet, faster crypto, and faster filtering.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          Guest
                          last edited by

                          @phil.davis:

                          Given the flurry of activity on Redmine and Github in recent days it looks like bits and pieces are being seriously tidied up, ready for a 2.1 release.
                          Master has both FreeBSD 10 implementation, and new "PHP-based" features that do not depend much on the underlying FreeBSD version.
                          A couple of questions:

                          1. How is the progress on getting a pfSense 2.2 build to work based on FreeBSD 10?
                            If that is going well, and we can have snapshot builds of master with FreeBSD 10 in the next few weeks, then ignore the next question.

                          2. What is planned for the 2.1 branch? Will 2.1.1, 2.1.2… be purely bugfix releases? Or will they also accept functional changes that are not dependent on moving to FreeBSD 10? Will 2.1.n snapshots continue to be built after the formal 2.1 release?
                            It might be handy to provide a path for a little while that allows new functionality to be released without requiring that sites jump to FreeBSD 10. (Then again, FreeBSD 10 might be so good and stable that everyone hurries to get on the pfSense 2.2 bandwagon...)

                          there will be a 2.1.1 release.  It will be out "Real Soon Now" (tm, as jimp joked)

                          In part it will include better support for certain Intel Ethernet drivers.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            Guest
                            last edited by

                            pfSense 2.2 snapshots are available as of today as well.  :)

                            https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=74154.0

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              Guest
                              last edited by

                              Heck, there was even a 2.1.2.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.