Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Lanner 7573 Support

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    22 Posts 9 Posters 6.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jasonlitka
      last edited by

      The i210 ports should work as they use the same updated driver as the i354 ports (which some vendors keep labeling as Marvell).  I suspect that they are the two ports you mentioned that aren't working correctly.  Check the BIOS to make sure that they don't have the Bypass option forced on if your system shipped with it.

      Also, unless you have a specific reason to leave it in, I'd remove the hw.igb.num_queues=1 line from your loader.conf.local.  It isn't needed any more under 2.1.1+ with high core & NIC counts, all you need to do is increase nmbclusters, and in some cases it seems to have contributed to abnormally-high latency.

      I can break anything.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        Actually, Ermal found some problems with the i210 before 2.1.1 dropped, and we've not gotten back to it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          @itwurx:

          Should probably be renamed Lanner SDEC driver, watchguards are just rebranded lanners

          Interestingly that driver was originally developed for the Watchguard X-Core boxes which actually used an SDEC LCD and was not manufactured by Lanner.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jasonlitka
            last edited by

            @gonzopancho:

            Actually, Ermal found some problems with the i210 before 2.1.1 dropped, and we've not gotten back to it.

            Ah, good to know.

            I can break anything.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              Blooregard
              last edited by

              I'm having some trouble with i211 ethernet controller too. Same vendor (Lanner) but a different model FW-7543.

              The best result was in 2.0.3 version with serial output, but without if_igb found. I've tried compile Intel's i211 driver (different versions) in FreeBSD 8.1(i386) but without success. Only in 8.3 version it compile with success. (both i386 and amd64)

              I've tried this: http://gnurds.com/index.php/2014/01/07/intel-i210-nic-in-pfsense-2-1/

              Strange situation with pfs 2.1.x and 2.2 (alpha) I can't get any serial output. (I don't have VGA cable).

              I'm still trying… but additional help will be appreciated! :)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                demco
                last edited by

                Blooregard,

                See if the following steps help.

                Start with nano vga image. Modify the image / cf card directly, before install into the device.

                • create file boot.config in root directory, containing only "-h" (no qoute)

                • create file /boot/loader.conf.local
                    - contain "console=comconsole" (no quote)

                • edit file /etc/ttys
                    - set entry ttyu0 to cons25 on

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Try this for getting output to the com port:
                  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=76382.msg418066#msg418066

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    Blooregard
                    last edited by

                    demco,

                    Thanks for your instructions!

                    But…

                    The output still stops at line:

                    IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • luckman212L
                      luckman212 LAYER 8
                      last edited by

                      Does anyone know if pfSense could be made to run on the Lanner 8893C?  (since we're talking about high end Lanner devices here…)
                      http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/x86-rackmount-appliances/fw-8893c

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        last edited by

                        The Colleto Creek QA parts won't work.  We have a few of these internally, but decided to concentrate on AES-NI first.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          It's got a different LCD modules to previous Lanner devices so the driver mentioned above probably won't work. That may not concern you.  ;)

                          Edit: Already confirmed as working in the first post. Presumably not all the buttons function.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • O
                            ohmantics
                            last edited by

                            I would have expected the 7573 to use EFI like the 7575 does. Unless I misunderstood, 2.1.3 can't boot on an EFI machine, right?

                            (I'd love to boot my 7575 without ESXi installed. It's a nightmare.)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              @ohmantics:

                              Unless I misunderstood, 2.1.3 can't boot on an EFI machine, right?

                              Why do you think that? I would think that only problem if it has a non-disableable secure boot.

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • O
                                ohmantics
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10:

                                @ohmantics:

                                Unless I misunderstood, 2.1.3 can't boot on an EFI machine, right?

                                Why do you think that? I would think that only problem if it has a non-disableable secure boot.

                                Steve

                                I guess BIOS compatibility in UEFI firmware is more common than I understood.

                                I was able to boot from a USB key with the 2.1.3 memstick/serial image on it.

                                However, I was not able to get all the way to the web server and the UI. I seem to get stuck indefinitely at "Configuring WAN interface…" which in this case is igb4, an Intel 82580DB. All interfaces were correctly identified during setup.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Is the WAN actually connected and receiving and IP? It can take a while to timeout otherwise. NTP too.

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • O
                                    ohmantics
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10:

                                    Is the WAN actually connected and receiving and IP? It can take a while to timeout otherwise. NTP too.

                                    Steve

                                    Yes, it's connected, but it's a static IP and there's no upstream DHCP server. How long is the timeout here? There was no progress for 30 minutes.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Not that long and not at all if it's not waiting for DHCP. Maybe 30s max for ntp, probably less I've never timed it.
                                      You have some other issue there.

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • O
                                        ohmantics
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10:

                                        Not that long and not at all if it's not waiting for DHCP. Maybe 30s max for ntp, probably less I've never timed it.
                                        You have some other issue there.

                                        Steve

                                        Any tips for debugging it?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Should probably start a new thread for this different model.

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • luckman212L
                                            luckman212 LAYER 8
                                            last edited by

                                            To the OP: how's it going with your FW-7573?  Are you running the 2.2 betas now?  Any update on compat or performance?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.