Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DLNA + BRIDGE + IGMP PROXY

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    18 Posts 3 Posters 6.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      It is performance mostly. Dedicated chips in even the cheapest switches are always going to be faster than software, at least in latency terms.  Also it's cost. In most situations it costs far more to add NICs to get more ports than it does to connect a switch. Of course in a box like the XTM5 you already have 7 NICs so you may as well use all of them as I outlined above.  :)

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        As mentioned performance is prob always going to be better with an actual switch.. As "test" or lab ports with bridge sure ok..  I personally would use those ports when/if you want to add more segments to your network.

        Or even in a lagg sort of setup for bandwidth or failover, etc.
        https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/LAGG_Interfaces

        Leveraging interfaces on the device your running pfsense on for "switch" ports by bridging them into a network segment would rarely be best use of the interface.  If as mentioned you need to filter between two physical sections of your network segment then ok bridge interfaces would allow you to do that, etc.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          infinityz
          last edited by

          UPDATE:

          Changed my configuration accordingly to your suggestions.

          WAN: public IP from cable modem

          WLAN: 192.168.1.1 DHCP enabled

          LAN: 192.168.2.1 DHCP enabled

          Everything is working as expected, but the transfer speed between WLAN and LAN is very slow, 1mbyte/sec roughly
          No traffic shaping or QoS enabled of course…..any idea? :-\

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            Your wireless sucks?  Would be my first guess ;) hehehe

            How are you testing?  Last test I got 271Mbps over a wireless AC connection without even trying to tweak anything..  And my pfsense is virtual on old N40L hardware, etc.  Plug something in with a wire on pfsense wlan segment what are your speeds then?

            What is your wireless AP, clients?  Are you G, N, AC?  How are you doing the test showing 1MBps?

            Did you completely remove all the bridging stuff..  Maybe you got multicast you don't want flooding your wlan causing issues?

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              infinityz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz:

              Your wireless sucks?  Would be my first guess ;) hehehe

              How are you testing?  Last test I got 271Mbps over a wireless AC connection without even trying to tweak anything..  And my pfsense is virtual on old N40L hardware, etc.  Plug something in with a wire on pfsense wlan segment what are your speeds then?

              What is your wireless AP, clients?  Are you G, N, AC?  How are you doing the test showing 1MBps?

              Did you completely remove all the bridging stuff..  Maybe you got multicast you don't want flooding your wlan causing issues?

              I'd agree with you about the wireless that sucks :-) But this is not the case, with my previous configuration, all ports bridged, my speed was around 50mbytes/sec.
              the AP configuration didn't change.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by

                50MBytes ps over wireless?  So 400Mbps roughly – yeah I find that a little hard to believe ;)

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Yup, need to clarify bits or bytes.
                  Such a dramatic reduction look for a duplex mismatch. Are you using the fxp interface? I've seen some odd behaviour on that NIC.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    infinityz
                    last edited by

                    The AP has 4 gigabit ports, so it's acting as a switch if I connect to it over cable I can easily achieve 50mbytes/sec as transfer speed. Wirelessly 12mbytes/sec
                    WLAN –> EM1
                    LAN --> EM2

                    The numbers above are coming from my previous setup, where all the ports were bridged, only 1 subnet and 1 dhcp server.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      So how were your NICs/subnets/cables arranged when you saw only 1MB/s?

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by

                        wired I see 900Mbps..  Yeah 50MBps over a wired gig connection would be common place..

                        If your AP has switch ports, its most likely a wireless router that your just using as AP would be my guess.

                        How are you wired currently would help us point to your problem - I would agree 1MB or 1Mb over a wire something is major wrong.. duplex mismatch would be my first bet too.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • I
                          infinityz
                          last edited by

                          Ok, I've made some more test!
                          I've enabled the HW offload and I've attached a laptop directly to the WLAN interface. Transfer rate between WLAN and LAN 80mbytes/sec (yes megabytes)
                          Re-connected the AP to WLAN, configured my laptop in wireless N 5ghz 450mbps rock solid at 2 mt from the AP. Transfer from WLAN to LAN 1 mbytes/sec
                          Speedtest on internet, wo WLAN to WAN 93mbps/sec

                          So looks like the problem is the wireless…but how is possible I'm getting better speed over wireless on internet then on internal lan?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • I
                            infinityz
                            last edited by

                            Ok, I've found the problem! For some reason my killer wireless card had the bandwidth control enabled….it's a "feature" from Atheros.

                            Many thanks for your help and sorry to wasted your time :-/

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Never would have thought of that. Thanks for reporting back.

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.