• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

6rd support added

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
103 Posts 30 Posters 73.4k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F
    Fegu
    last edited by May 13, 2014, 7:02 AM

    Me too. You can access a live system where we accept downtime. Play around and fiddle. If you make it work, you will know immediately.

    The Wan config is already in there.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      survive
      last edited by May 24, 2014, 6:30 PM

      Hi guys,

      Still waiting for someone to let me know when they want to connect to my 2.2. vm and finally sort this out.

      -Will

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        Fegu
        last edited by May 25, 2014, 7:52 PM

        Same here. Always ready!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          WolphFang
          last edited by May 26, 2014, 5:27 PM

          Trying to setup 6rd on AT&T DSL here on 2.1.3-RELEASE (i386)

          If I understand this thread … it won't work till something is fixed?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            survive
            last edited by May 26, 2014, 6:52 PM

            Hi Wolphfang,

            I would say most likely not.

            The worst part is 6RD has been broken for over a year and the post above is the first real nibble we have gotten about actually fixing it, but that opportunity seems to be fading fast.

            -Will

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eri--
              last edited by May 29, 2014, 8:07 PM

              Ok people give it a shot with tomorrows snapshots.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                survive
                last edited by May 30, 2014, 11:36 PM

                Hi ermal,

                Well I gave the latest snapshot (pfSense-LiveCD-2.2-DEVELOPMENT-amd64-20140530-1557) a try. I did a fresh install but when it's booting I get to:

                Starting syslog…done.
                Starting CRON...done.

                And there it hangs, right before the "Welcome to pfSense....." console menu.

                -Will

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eri--
                  last edited by Jun 6, 2014, 10:37 AM

                  The new snapshots have been fixed for 2.2.
                  So just give a shot and let me know if it works.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    survive
                    last edited by Jun 9, 2014, 9:33 PM

                    Hi ermal,

                    I just tried the snapshot from 09-Jun-2014 19:51.

                    Still doesn't work.

                    As always, please let me know if you want to remote into my system and see what's going on.

                    -Will

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      puithove
                      last edited by Jun 13, 2014, 11:10 AM

                      Having the same issue here on snapshot Thu Jun 12 15:49:45 CDT 2014.  I'm on Charter and trying to use their 6rd implementation.

                      I'd really like to see this fixed.  It's past time for me to get some experience with IPv6.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        survive
                        last edited by Jun 13, 2014, 8:30 PM

                        Hi puithove,

                        Best I can tell you is to be patient, I've been waiting for a year and a half.

                        I just hope it gets fixed so there's enough time using it that fixing it was even worthwhile.

                        That said, based on what I've read in the 2.2 forums here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=78078.msg425758#msg425758

                        Most of the "problems" lately are non-issues or temporary issues with snapshots. There are a couple more features we're waiting to integrate/test and then it is clear to progress to Beta, so … it's difficult to say. For some, it might be OK now, for most, perhaps not quite yet. If it works, it'll keep working, but if you obsessively track snapshots, maybe not.

                        6RD might be fixed, might not. Bums me out....

                        -Will

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          Burg3rMak3r
                          last edited by Jun 16, 2014, 7:17 AM

                          FYI, added a bounty for this issue:
                          https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=78216.0

                          I have the same ISP as 2 users in this thread, hopefully someone picks this up now ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            Pertan
                            last edited by Oct 13, 2014, 6:06 AM

                            Still doesn't work in snapshot 2.2-BETA (amd64) built on Sun Oct 12 11:15:43 CDT 2014 FreeBSD 10.1-RC2.

                            Country: Sweden | ISP: Telia FiberLAN

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              eri--
                              last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 6:27 PM

                              You can try the latest snapshots.

                              https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2882 Just check that you have a default gw.
                              The default gw will be fixed ASAP.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                cmb
                                last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 7:33 PM

                                Confirmed this works now. Probably be the first snapshot on the 20th that includes all the changes. Being on a snapshot from the 19th plus a gitsync to master will also fix.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P
                                  Pertan
                                  last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 9:07 PM Nov 19, 2014, 9:01 PM

                                  @cmb:

                                  Confirmed this works now. Probably be the first snapshot on the 20th that includes all the changes. Being on a snapshot from the 19th plus a gitsync to master will also fix.

                                  Running Nov 19 08:31:57 CST 2014 build and it did not work until I gitsynced it and now it works. Thanks :)

                                  Edit: Gateway still shows as offline though, but I can ping outside addresses.

                                  Your readiness score: 10/10 @ http://test-ipv6.com

                                  Country: Sweden | ISP: Telia FiberLAN

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cmb
                                    last edited by Nov 19, 2014, 10:47 PM

                                    Put a monitor IP in for the gateway that'll actually reply (such as Google's public DNS 2001:4860:4860::8888), the 6rd gateway generally won't reply, which is why it shows offline.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J
                                      jjstecchino
                                      last edited by Dec 5, 2014, 12:49 PM Nov 25, 2014, 5:11 AM

                                      6rd working for me now. using centurylink/qwest. What was the problem?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        jjstecchino
                                        last edited by Dec 5, 2014, 2:08 AM

                                        Is 6rd broken again? I noticed on latest snapshot 6rd is not working anymore.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          jjstecchino
                                          last edited by Dec 5, 2014, 4:47 PM

                                          I think around late November to make it work I had to gitsync to master. I suppose the latest snapshots are built from master. Am I correct or do I still need to gitsync?
                                          I really enjoyed having working 6rd and IPV6 connectivity and I would love to have it working again.

                                          On interface status, WAN gets:

                                          IPv6 address	2602:47:3004:c800::	 
                                          Subnet mask IPv6	24
                                          Gateway IPv6	2602:cdab:240::
                                          

                                          LAN set to track wan gets:

                                          IPv6 address	2602:47:3004:c800::1	 
                                          Subnet mask IPv6	64
                                          
                                          

                                          IPV6 Routing table:

                                          ::1	link#11	UH	0	16384	lo0
                                          2602::/24	link#13	U	0	1280	wan_stf
                                          2602:47:3004:c800::	link#13	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          2602:47:3004:c800::/64	link#6	U	4713	1500	sk1
                                          2602:47:3004:c800::1	link#6	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::%sk0/64	link#5	U	0	1500	sk0
                                          fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52bd%sk0	link#5	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::%sk1/64	link#6	U	787	1500	sk1
                                          fe80::1:1%sk1	link#6	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::%sk3/64	link#8	U	0	1500	sk3
                                          fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52ba%sk3	link#8	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::%lo0/64	link#11	U	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::1%lo0	link#11	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          fe80::%ovpns1/64	link#14	U	0	1500	ovpns1
                                          fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52c1%ovpns1	link#14	UHS	0	16384	lo0
                                          ff01::%sk0/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52bd%sk0	U	0	1500	sk0
                                          ff01::%sk1/32	fe80::1:1%sk1	U	0	1500	sk1
                                          ff01::%sk3/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52ba%sk3	U	0	1500	sk3
                                          ff01::%lo0/32	::1	U	0	16384	lo0
                                          ff01::%ovpns1/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52c1%ovpns1	U	0	1500	ovpns1
                                          ff02::%sk0/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52bd%sk0	U	0	1500	sk0
                                          ff02::%sk1/32	fe80::1:1%sk1	U	3	1500	sk1
                                          ff02::%sk3/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52ba%sk3	U	0	1500	sk3
                                          ff02::%lo0/32	::1	U	0	16384	lo0
                                          ff02::%ovpns1/32	fe80::290:7fff:fe3c:52c1%ovpns1	U	0	1500	ovpns1
                                          
                                          

                                          Is it missing a default gateway?

                                          Please be patient with me as I am learning IPV6 and I may be doing something wrong. With the exception of the routing tabe which I have no way to compare to the previous working setup, interfaces seem to get the same addresses as the previous working setup as my dynamic IPV4 has not changed since (It is dynamic but the same ipv4 address tends to stick for months at the time). Your IPV6 on 6rd is calculated based to your IPV4 right?

                                          Also how do you check if wan_stf is passing traffic?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received