Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Custom pfSense box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    13 Posts 6 Posters 4.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      DiskWizard
      last edited by

      Seems like WIFI here is AW-NB037H. Related topic follows

      https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=65048.0

      1. GA-N3150M-D3P 8Gb RAM

      2. GA-C1037EN-EU 4GB RAM

      • 2,5 SATA III Solid State Drive SLIM S60
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        Kenneth_H
        last edited by

        Thanks for your answers. It sounds like the wifi-card is not getting to use it's full potential, so maybe I have to choose another board.
        Do you have any recommendations for a Mini-ITX board with dual gigabit ethernet, that can run on the CPU and RAM that I have and still support pfSense?

        I did have a look at this board: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4405

        But do you have other recommendations for a compatible motherboard tha meets my requirements?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          DiskWizard
          last edited by

          Look for something from Supermicro, maybe. Same problem with Gigabyte - Realtek NIC's. Look for some motherboard with Intel NIC's, Marvell worked for me as well.

          1. GA-N3150M-D3P 8Gb RAM

          2. GA-C1037EN-EU 4GB RAM

          • 2,5 SATA III Solid State Drive SLIM S60
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            Kenneth_H
            last edited by

            I think you have to explain it a little to me. I don't understand why you all recommend to avoid the realtek NIC's. All of my computers have up to this point been using Realtek NIC's and my old pfSense box did also use a Realtek NIC. I have had no issues at all with these NIC's.
            I know that it has something to do with the quality of the NIC, but as I will be using it for a small network with two internal networks and 5 servers on a 50Mbit fiber connection I don't see why I cannot use a board with Realtek NIC's.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              ivanhoek
              last edited by

              Agreed, you CAN use a board with Realtek NICs.

              However, just because you CAN do something, it doesn't mean you SHOULD.

              Make sense?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                Kenneth_H
                last edited by

                Yes, it does make sense.
                But can someone please give me 1 really good reason for not using a board with Realtek NIC's. As of now I think I will go with the Gigabyte board I linked to in a previous post.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  DiskWizard
                  last edited by

                  At my opinion, the problem could be described like that -

                  If the NIC cannot handle inbound/outbound connection streams, then, when NIC goes out of it's throughoutput capacity, for example,  SIP devices will produce garble sounds due to increased network latency.

                  1. GA-N3150M-D3P 8Gb RAM

                  2. GA-C1037EN-EU 4GB RAM

                  • 2,5 SATA III Solid State Drive SLIM S60
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    ivanhoek
                    last edited by

                    This is why:

                    http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/18497

                    Although you can get away using one, and it will probably be fine. However, there's alternatives available without these problems.. is the uncertainty worth the few bucks you save to you?

                    I guess it depends how much of a financial hardship we're talking about.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jasonlitka
                      last edited by

                      @ivanhoek:

                      This is why:

                      http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/18497

                      Although you can get away using one, and it will probably be fine. However, there's alternatives available without these problems.. is the uncertainty worth the few bucks you save to you?

                      I guess it depends how much of a financial hardship we're talking about.

                      Realtek's 100Mbit cards were absolute trash.  The Gig-E parts are much better but they're still not in the realm of even a low-end Intel part.  If you're trying to push typical "home" speeds they're fine.

                      I can break anything.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        BeerCan
                        last edited by

                        I used the gig realtek nics in a production environment for a long time with no issues.  They are not as bad as they were many years ago but the reputation they (deservedly) received has remained.

                        If you can afford a supermicro board they are worth the price especially if this is for a work environment.  For a home network I would not stress about what board you use to much.

                        I tried about a year ago to get wireless working with pfsense directly and had many issues so eventually I gave up.  I now use a ubiquity AP instead and it has been rock solid.  Worth the extra expense IMO.
                        http://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/
                        http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Networks-UniFi-Enterprise-System/dp/B004XXMUCQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1405274434&sr=8-1&keywords=ubiquiti+uap

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.