Outbout NAT At My Limit
-
Anyone?
-
I was hoping someone could at least confirm my logic with that attached picture above.
Perhaps the best thing would be for me to pay for the support and go that route.
-
I was hoping someone could at least confirm my logic with that attached picture above.
Your logic is hereby confirmed :) The picture looks good!
-
Thank you sir! ;D
-
You did clear states after making changes but before testing right?
-
Yes of course.
Issue seems to be; with the vlans I can select the specific public IP, but with the LAN I can only select 'interface address' which would reflect a local, a vlan public which would be incorrect or a specified subnet. Choosing specified subnet 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32' doesn't work and /29 reflects an ip just below the gateway? .248 whereas the gateway is .249
-
Wait a minute.
You want connections from LAN to VLAN to appear to be coming from 24.39.20.250?
To what interface is that VIP assigned?
-
Yes,
That's just it, it's the only public IP that is not VIP. It is assigned to the WAN
-
I'm not sure how you expect to NAT an address that isn't assigned to either of the interfaces involved in carrying the traffic.
That seems pretty convoluted to me and I'm not surprised it's not behaving as you think it should.
-
Workstation on LAN accesses Webserver on VLAN by way of domain.com, dns call goes out to determine IP of domain.com = 24.111.111.111.
Server should think request is from IP 24.111.111.110 (pub IP of LAN).Perhaps this should be accomplished with a static route?
