Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traverse Viking ADSL-2+ Card Problem

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    44 Posts 4 Posters 10.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      Nonsense
      last edited by

      I lowered my DSL download speed this morning at ca. 9:08 am from ca. 15 Mbs to ca. 10 Mb/s to see if it would reduce my packet loss, however, the speed change had the opposite effect–it significantly increased my packet loss (by over an average factor of two)!  I wonder what could cause this increase when the speed change served to increase my S/N by ca. 6 dB?  Perhaps the source of my packet loss is not my telephone line after all?

      status_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb
      status_rrd_graph_img.php.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        It could be an issue with apinger itself. Quite a few people have reported that though mostly with ridiculous figures like >100% packet loss!
        Do you see packet loss if you just run a ping test?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nonsense
          last edited by

          I'm still collecting data, then I'll try the ping test.  Here is a graph of when I lowered my download speed to ca. 5 mb/s, attaining a ca. 21.5 dB S/N.  Note the continued increase in packet loss as I lower the speed and thereby raise the S/N.

          status_rrd_graph_img.php.png
          status_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            Nonsense
            last edited by

            Steve:

            Doing repeated simple pings to my DSLAM (IP address changed below to disguised it) I get no packet loss:

            PING 12.9.74.1 (12.9.74.1): 56 data bytes
            64 bytes from 12.9.74.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=127 time=16.261 ms
            64 bytes from 12.9.74.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=16.658 ms
            64 bytes from 12.9.74.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=16.686 ms

            –- 12.9.74.1 ping statistics ---
            3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
            round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 16.261/16.535/16.686/0.194 ms

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              Nonsense
              last edited by

              Back to ca. 15 Mb/s with increased power and S/N, both downstream and upstream; this can't be right–it's got to be an apinger problem.  Yup, restarting apinger tames its readout:

              status.restart_rrd_graph_img.php.png
              status_rrd_graph_img.php.png
              status_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb
              status.restart_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Try setting apinger to use a different remote address. Preferably something close to you.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  Nonsense
                  last edited by

                  I tried a different IP address in apinger and basically got the same packet loss results.  On the other hand, I tried running the ping tests at dslreports.com and saw no packet loss.  Also, all ISP tests on my DSL line indicate it is stable.  I am trying another, off site, ping test to my IP address and will report back on it when I obtain the data.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    Nonsense
                    last edited by

                    A 24-hour Ping Test (via dslreports.com) shows zero packet loss in tabulated data and graph (notch down in graph shows transition from Interleaved mode to Fastpath mode):

                    PLG.gif
                    PLG.gif_thumb

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 8
                      8ayM
                      last edited by

                      I'll go home and check, I'm not sure if you'd be interested trying a different PCI ADSL modem as I have a case of ones that I use to sell and get a pretty penny for on eBay. I actually just fig them out planning on selling them again for some extra dough. I'll post the model and if your interested cover shipping and one is yours.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • 8
                        8ayM
                        last edited by

                        The card I've got is a Songoma S518 ADSL Card 2005  Rev. C (low profile model with full size bracket), about 3 years ago I was getting over $100 each for them. Your welcome to one if you want to try a different adapter, just cover S&H.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          The Sangoma S518 is a real modem, rather than a router/modem on a PCI card. As such it requires a specific driver and I'm not sure one exists for FreeBSD. There is a Linux driver though so it may have been ported.

                          Edit: Not listed on the main support site but there is a FreeBSD driver: ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/FreeBSD/wanpipe/
                          Not sure if anything newer than FreeBSD 6 exists though.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N
                            Nonsense
                            last edited by

                            I would not mind having one of the Songoma cards, but it would be of no use to me unless there is a current driver for it that will work with pfSense–and the specs I found for it seem to indicate it does not do ADSL2+ as it has a download bandwidth limitation of 8 Mb/s.  I also have explored purchasing a commercial-grade modem, however, they are very expensive--my LinITX card seems to be sailing pretty smoothly now.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N
                              Nonsense
                              last edited by

                              My pfSense router has run for 23 days now without a reboot or PPPoE disconnect–I was hoping to report on it here after a month without a reboot, however, my local power utility experienced a brownout this morning that forced a reboot--but I guess I'll call my new ADSL2+ modem card a success at this point anyway.  Thanks, jonesr, for your card recommendation!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                jonesr
                                last edited by

                                Not a problem, I am glad you are happy with it.

                                If anyone else has been following this thread I still have one of these cards and would be happy to send it to anyone in return for a donation to the pfSense project.

                                Completely off topic, but I met someone recently who I told me he had met two people writing 802.11n drivers for FreeBSD, and told them they were wasting their time and to do something worthwhile with their lives. He and I share the same first name, you have just reminded me to make a donation to the FreeBSD project in our name.

                                pfSense AMD64 VGA - Assume latest version.
                                Suricata, pfBlockerNG, SquidGuard, squid3.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Sounds like a useful individual.  ::)

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.