Transparent Proxy issue?

Tikimotel

I've unchecked this "Allow users on interface" and saved.
Now I get a denied message, too.

Please check "Allow users on interface", or add the allowed subnets manually in the tab "ACLs"

Have you added anything to the "Authentication" tab?
Can you try and set "Authentication method" to "none", or add the subnets to "Subnets that don't need authentication" field below that.

zaf

So it only half of what is needed.
You'll need both lines from my example for transparent mode to work, both are set by the squid GUI.

Do you have "Allow users on interface" enabled?

see attached, so how I do I add the other line?7

Thanks

proxy.PNG_thumb

zaf

authentication tab is set to none?

authen.PNG_thumb

zaf

the strange thing is when I turn transparent proxy on, google page works (hit and miss), but if I try another site say bbc.co.uk it say page cannot be displayed?

:-\

really confusing the hell out of me!

Tikimotel

The second is depending on your connection type, PPPoE for instance has a different rule than Ethernet connected.

Have you tried to remove the pkg config, uninstall the package and then fully re-install the package?

Login the terminal/ssh or local on the box.
Use the option 12 (developer shell)
And issue the "playback" command to remove pkg config.
(playback removepkgconfig squid/squid3/squid3-dev)
The logout of the terminal shell.
The package config is the removed from the config.XML, so re-installing squid package from the GUI will be like the very first install, no old settings are restored.

I'm currently running "squid3-dev" on pfSense v2.1.4 (64-bit) from what I can tell from your images you are running a previous squid package version?
I don't know if the missing libs is fixed yet in the "squid3-dev" installer, but you can look up these libs in the forum topic there.
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=62256.165

Marcello has done a lot of work in the squid3-dev package, and for my use case it works great. (it works for me )
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=48347.0

My 2cents to get SquidGuard to cooperate with squid3-dev
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=73640.0

zaf

here is the screen print of packages installed, do you want me to uninstall this and install the highlighted in yellow on the second screen print?

Thanks

packages.PNG_thumb

squid.PNG_thumb

Tikimotel

Your current squid is version 2 based. (a.k.a old)
I don't know if there is any development on that package…

When re-installing you version of squid, just make sure the old squid pkg settings are gone, because now you have weird issues.

I suggest you use "Squid3-dev" in combination with "Squidguard-squid3", because there is more development on that being done.

KOM

Squid3-dev in pfSense 2.1.x is fragile and I would not recommend using it unless you have both time on your hands and a masochistic streak. Perhaps look at it in pfSense 2.2-ALPHA.

zaf

more confusion!! :-\

im thinking of giving up on this, unless someone gives me assured tested solution please?

Thanks

Liath.WW

Zaf, by chance do you have multiple WAN interfaces? Squid (and even pfsense itself) tend to by super-flakey with multi-wan since I upgraded to 2.1.4 and I think it has to do with apinger failing and dropping connections that are perfectly valid, while also continuously saying that the gateway that is down is actually up.

I'd initially thought that squid was at fault, but I completely removed squid and still had the issue, so I shut down the failover interface and suddenly everything works again. Moved the two connections to an old router and it seems to be working fine now, though its much slower than having the connections directly connected to the pfsense box.

zaf

Liath, no I don't have multiple WAN interface on pfsense, I have attached some screen prints and my network setup.

Basically, I connect via wireless router for LAN access, DHCP is set on pfsense firewall, so I get IP in range of 192.168.0.X.

Could this be an issue that I'm connecting via wireless router though its just used as LAN connection?

Thanks

wan.PNG_thumb

wan1.PNG_thumb
![Network setup.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Network setup.PNG)
![Network setup.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Network setup.PNG_thumb)

zaf

anymore to add before I give up on this?

Thanks

Tikimotel

@KOM:

Squid3-dev in pfSense 2.1.x is fragile and I would not recommend using it unless you have both time on your hands and a masochistic streak. Perhaps look at it in pfSense 2.2-ALPHA.

What is fragile about it?
I Must be mayor masochist then, runs fine here. (before the 2.1.5 update Squid3-dev was running no problems for 51 days)

At least I was (am) trying to help zaf.

@zaf are you double NAT-ting? (double NAT is bad!)
I don't get it? Does the wireless come from your ISP with a private address?

I suggest google double NAT.
Try and resolve that issue first then try squid again, even the squid2 you where trying would work fine then.

zaf

@Tikimotel:

@zaf are you double NAT-ting? (double NAT is bad!)
I don't get it? Does the wireless come from your ISP with a private address?

Tikimotel, the wireless router is mine used for wireless access.

when you say double NAT, do you mean I have LAN interface on pfsense (DHCP) and WAN interface of Pfsense to wireless router (DHCP) and wireless router to Virgin Media broadband router.

Then the answer is probably yes.

I use wireless router for wireless connections but the clients get IP from the Pfsense DHCP!

Thanks

BBcan177

@zaf:

@Tikimotel:

@zaf are you double NAT-ting? (double NAT is bad!)
I don't get it? Does the wireless come from your ISP with a private address?

Tikimotel, the wireless router is mine used for wireless access.

when you say double NAT, do you mean I have LAN interface on pfsense (DHCP) and WAN interface of Pfsense to wireless router (DHCP) and wireless router to Virgin Media broadband router.

Then the answer is probably yes.

I use wireless router for wireless connections but the clients get IP from the Pfsense DHCP!

Thanks

If you are able to get your Internet Provider to provide a "Bridged Mode" setting in the Modem, this will eliminate the Double NAT issue.

Your Modem is getting the Real Internet Address instead of pfSense getting the real address.

Tikimotel

The issue with double NAT is that the translation can only happen once.
So the first NAT can translate the private address and corresponding internet connection fine, but the second NAT can only translate the private address to another private address and basically does nothing.
I'm no expert at this, but the pfsense box should handle the real internet adress.
I've setup all my wireless stuff using an wireless router as a access point.

ISP –> pfSense box --> wired device(s) incl. wireless router

Configure wireless router as an access point, other devices should point to pfSense to get DHCP address information (so wireless devices are routed to the pfSense box by the access point automatically).

Safety Tip! You need to make sure only wired devices are allowed to change the wireless router configuration.

zaf

ok Thanks, give me till weekend and I will change it around and connect pfsense direct to the ISP modem etc..

Thanks

Tikimotel

Zaf, you should read up the manual of the wireless router if it supports the function or role as an "access point".

With my equipment it was a option under "operating mode", then I simply choose "access point" and I was done.
Your mileage may vary.

Please post again if you have issues setting up the access point, or anything. I will try to help you out.

zaf

Thanks Tikimotel, my wireless router is TP-LINK WR1043ND, I will have a look and see If the option for access point is supported.

Thanks

Tikimotel

I looked up the router info.

This looks interesting:
http://www.justanswer.com/computer-networking/817le-trying-set-tp-link-tl-wr1043nd-access-point.html