Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Weird RRD Graphs average 40% packet loss normal? - Optus Cable AUS

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    13 Posts 5 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • KOMK
      KOM
      last edited by

      I've read posts before about some people with phantom packet loss from apinger, so this may be that.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kpo967
        last edited by

        So is there any way around this?  I disabled gateway monitoring, but the graphing stopped.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          Guest
          last edited by

          If you disable the monitor then you can get no data! ;)

          Go to "System" -> "Routing" and select your gateway, try an alternative IP for "monitor IP" and play arround with "Latency threshold" and "Packet Loss threshold"…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            When apinger is reporting 40% loss, what do you get with a regular ping to the same gateway IP that's being monitored?

            I saw consistent 6% loss from apinger once and pinging the same gateway 10 times per second from my LAN was 0%.

            I don't think anyone knows what's really wrong with apinger but it's obviously something, for some people, sometimes.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kpo967
              last edited by

              regular ping using pfsense to ping using LAN ipaddress
              average ping 7ms 0% loss

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                Harvy66
                last edited by

                @kpo967:

                regular ping using pfsense to ping using LAN ipaddress
                average ping 7ms 0% loss

                7ms to the LAN, assuming not wireless, is quite bad. Driver issue? What's your interrupt cpu time when trying to transfer data?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  I think he means pinging gateway address from LAN address, in which case 7ms is quite good.  :)

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    Harvy66
                    last edited by

                    @Derelict:

                    I think he means pinging gateway address from LAN address, in which case 7ms is quite good.  :)

                    He did say he's getting high loss to this gateway, I think. Well, he's getting "40% loss" to something with apinger.

                    According to my quality graph, 1.9ms avg with 2.02ms max and 0% loss. But hey, who is counting?

                    I wonder what his WAN bandwidth is. Could we get a bandwidth graph for the same periods of time? Packetloss is one thing, but higher pings indicate queuing/congestion.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      I have seen it too.  apinger/quality graphs reporting 6% loss but I can't get a manual ping to the same gateway to drop a packet during the time apinger says 6%.  Only happened to me once, but it happened.

                      Attached is about 9 months of data.  You can see the 6% in May.  I can Guar-On-Tee you there was not a two week period in March where I was experiencing 25% packet loss to my cable modems next-hop.

                      There is something wrong with apinger.  If it was just the graphs, it'd be no big deal, but it's multi-wan too.

                      ![Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 7.30.54 PM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 7.30.54 PM.png)
                      ![Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 7.30.54 PM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2014-09-11 at 7.30.54 PM.png_thumb)

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        Harvy66
                        last edited by

                        @Derelict:

                        I have seen it too.  apinger/quality graphs reporting 6% loss but I can't get a manual ping to the same gateway to drop a packet during the time apinger says 6%.  Only happened to me once, but it happened.

                        Attached is about 9 months of data.  You can see the 6% in May.  I can Guar-On-Tee you there was not a two week period in March where I was experiencing 25% packet loss to my cable modems next-hop.

                        There is something wrong with apinger.  If it was just the graphs, it'd be no big deal, but it's multi-wan too.

                        Your graphs show almost entirely just loss. His graphs also show a corresponding increase in latency. The loss and pings are nearly mirror images.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DerelictD
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by

                          Oh.  I don't know why I never clicked that link.  Yes, OP needs to shape his traffic or get more bandwidth, or there's something going on upstream and he needs a new ISP.

                          There's still something wrong with apinger.

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kpo967
                            last edited by

                            OK.
                            Thanks everyone for their input.  It seems there does seem to be an issue with apinger….but...
                            the main issue seems to stem from an ip phone plugged into the network (SNOM 720).  Once it was disconnected.. BAM! problem disappeared.  still waiting for enough time for the RRG graphs to verify this, but this seems to be the case.
                            here is the graph from bandwidth (obviously from later than OP post):
                            Traffic graphBTW.. My ISP plan with Optus Cable is 100Mbit/1.5Mbit
                            :(

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.