Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Basic out-going NAT isn't working

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    30 Posts 7 Posters 5.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by

      So its working with the auto, even switched to manual.. But when "add a manual rule and make a restart, has NAT stopped working."

      So what are you adding - clearly this is what is breaking it.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        To me this outbound NAT looks strange.  I don't see how it could work well.  I'd expect everything to exit over wan_kdg with these setting.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rubinho
          last edited by

          ???

          Guys, i have only to add one rule, the system itself has created all other rules ?!

          What should be wrong?

          [Pfsense 2.4] Supermicro A1SRI-2558F@Atom C2558 4Gb RAM
          [Pfsense 2.4] Jetway NF9D@Atom D2550 + AD3INLAN-G Expansioncard  (3x Intel 82541PI Gigabit Controller)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            Why do you have same source network on 2 different interfaces? 172.20/16  And then your openvpn network overlaps with that?

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              rubinho
              last edited by

              The Ovpn interface (HideMyAss) can be seen as a WAN interface and the LAN Device going depending on the Firewall Rule either over WAN_KDG or Hidemyass

              [Pfsense 2.4] Supermicro A1SRI-2558F@Atom C2558 4Gb RAM
              [Pfsense 2.4] Jetway NF9D@Atom D2550 + AD3INLAN-G Expansioncard  (3x Intel 82541PI Gigabit Controller)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kejianshi
                last edited by

                johnpoz  - Thats my question.  Its possible my understanding of outbound NAT is broken.
                But to me it seems this set of rules wont work well.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  Wolf666
                  last edited by

                  @kejianshi:

                  johnpoz  - Thats my question.  Its possible my understanding of outbound NAT is broken.
                  But to me it seems this set of rules wont work well.

                  They will not work.

                  You have 2 rules passing traffic on both WAN_KDG and HYDEMYASS from 172.20.0.0/16 and having the default gateway. The first condition matching the rule will be processed, it means that the one on HYDEMYASS will never be processed.

                  If my understanding of Outbound NAT is correct.

                  Modem Draytek Vigor 130
                  pfSense 2.4 Supermicro A1SRi-2558 - 8GB ECC RAM - Intel S3500 SSD 80GB - M350 Case
                  Switch Cisco SG350-10
                  AP Netgear R7000 (Stock FW)
                  HTPC Intel NUC5i3RYH
                  NAS Synology DS1515+
                  NAS Synology DS213+

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    Supermule Banned
                    last edited by

                    It is. First come, first served.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rubinho
                      last edited by

                      unless you use a firewall rule …..  ;)

                      example:
                      http://vdupain.wordpress.com/2013/09/24/configurer-un-client-openvpn-vers-hidemyass-hma-sous-pfsense/

                      pfsense4.jpg
                      pfsense4.jpg_thumb

                      [Pfsense 2.4] Supermicro A1SRI-2558F@Atom C2558 4Gb RAM
                      [Pfsense 2.4] Jetway NF9D@Atom D2550 + AD3INLAN-G Expansioncard  (3x Intel 82541PI Gigabit Controller)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kejianshi
                        last edited by

                        Yes - You can do it with a firewall rule.  Those are also first come first served.

                        I wouldn't try doing it in two places though.  Pick one.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          rubinho
                          last edited by

                          So I do not know what you want.

                          "DUAL" NAT works at the same time. Tested in 2.1.4

                          psctl -s state | grep 172.20.111.13
                          ovpnc5 icmp 172.20.111.13:1 -> 10.200.1.4:43502 -> 8.8.4.4      0:0
                          re1 icmp 172.20.111.13:1 -> 92.99.22.149:61907 -> 8.8.8.8      0:0

                          [Pfsense 2.4] Supermicro A1SRI-2558F@Atom C2558 4Gb RAM
                          [Pfsense 2.4] Jetway NF9D@Atom D2550 + AD3INLAN-G Expansioncard  (3x Intel 82541PI Gigabit Controller)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            I have all my NAT here at home set up the same way.  Using a failover gateway group of WAN (cable) and DSL.  Works perfectly (2.1.5).  OP should be able to send outbound traffic to either gateway using policy routing and it should catch the correct NAT rule.

                            rubinho what are the firewall rules and gateways / gateway groups set up like?

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rubinho
                              last edited by

                              At the moment i have no failover WAN , only one gateway rule for a separate proxy that goes over VPN (HideMyAss).

                              I must first take my Voipserver running before I plug in my second WAN into pfsense

                              [Pfsense 2.4] Supermicro A1SRI-2558F@Atom C2558 4Gb RAM
                              [Pfsense 2.4] Jetway NF9D@Atom D2550 + AD3INLAN-G Expansioncard  (3x Intel 82541PI Gigabit Controller)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.