Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Errors In Lan

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    13 Posts 7 Posters 2.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      FasTrak
      last edited by

      How come I have these errors In lan? bad NIC?
      My LAN is connected to a Cisco switch SG 200-26.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        heper
        last edited by

        faulty wiring or faulty network card or faulty cisco switch

        i'd try to swap them in that order ;)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          BeerCan
          last edited by

          678 packets out of 743070326?  That is a 0.00009124304608551951% error rate.  Don't worry about it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            Ethernet error counters should be zero.  You might want to be sure it wasn't a specific event like making a network change, replacing a cable, etc before you chase it down.  Is it incrementing?  Steadily?

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              FasTrak
              last edited by

              @Derelict:

              Ethernet error counters should be zero.  You might want to be sure it wasn't a specific event like making a network change, replacing a cable, etc before you chase it down.  Is it incrementing?  Steadily?

              Yes but it's not every day, the only network change is clients on and off

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                I would want to find it.  See if there are any errors in the switch.  Replacing the cable is the easiest place to start.

                Regarding changes I'm talking things that touch the physical layer.  Plugging and unplugging, rebooting, etc.  And things on other switch ports shouldn't matter - just the specific switch port and the connected LAN port.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  Harvy66
                  last edited by

                  Interesting to note on my PFSense.

                  WAN	LAN	ADMIN
                  Packets In 1458563363	1353600630	1397530
                  Packets Out 1345103593	1457907316	122592
                  Bytes In 968.42 GB	1090.12 GB	310.61 MB
                  Bytes Out 1083.66 GB	972.47 GB	8.90 MB
                  Errors In 42543	36801	0
                  Errors Out 0	0	6
                  Collisions 0	0	0
                  

                  Switch statistics

                  Port	Received Packets w/o Error	Received Packets with Error	Broadcast Received Packets	Transmitted Packets w/o Errors
                  WAN	2170231073	0	721104	1345095203
                  LAN	1457632636	0	6033	1349808440
                  

                  Kind of funny that the NIC has errors on both ports, inbound, but the switch has none. PFSense has 90 days of uptime, same as my switch because of a power outage, , maybe I was messing around with something during the past 3 months that indirectly caused "errors". That's an average of 0.00292%. I just stopped a ping against YouTube that has been running for 296.74 hours, which only had 318 losses over 2136490 packets, which is 0.014884%.

                  Seeing that the ping was a full round trip, to make it comparable, I have to split the average across all interface. 8 hops, which means 16 interfaces, there and back. 1.014884^(1/16) = 1.0009238 or 0.0009238% loss per hop. Seems my per hop loss to youtube is about 1/3 the loss from my switch to my firewall. Something else is at play, it's not randomly distributed.

                  I'm not trying to hijack, just trying to add other view points with an example.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chpalmerC
                    chpalmer
                    last edited by

                    over a terabyte in 43 days??!?  :o

                    Dude!  8)

                    But seriously-  Id wonder why as well…

                    Put a simple switch between the two ports and see if the errors stop.

                    Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      So all the errors are between the switch and the LAN NIC. You swapped that cable I assume?
                      It could be something obscure inducing interference in the cable. Does that cable run past any appliances/machinery etc? You could put an STP cable in there.
                      Is it a Gigabit connection? Does it need to be?

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F
                        FasTrak
                        last edited by

                        Think I have found the error, it was the onboard NIC (LAN) on my PfSense box.
                        After I had tried to switch cable and lan port on the switch.
                        I threw a new second PfSense box on and the error disappeared. had unfortunately not a new NIC card to test with,
                        but think I'll try that sometime or maybe a fiber NIC to my switch. Does anyone have a recommendation on a 1Gb /s fiber NIC?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          heper
                          last edited by

                          i wouldn't bother with fiber nic's. They are expensive ($200-$2000) and offer no benefits over short distances.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            Fiber can take errors too if dirty, etc.  Sometimes they even just stop working.  Copper should be clean to 100m.

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • F
                              FasTrak
                              last edited by

                              Thanks

                              I think i will stick with copper cable.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.