Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New to pfSense, and need advice on configuration settings.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    16 Posts 4 Posters 3.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Ok. Your issue with adding the second 'lan' adapter is, as you guessed, a subnet conflict.
      Your LAN interface is using 10.0.0.1/8 which is a huge subnet, everything from 10.0.0.0 to 10.255.255.255. You almost certainly don't need that!  ;)
      When you added your second NIC you gave it the address 10.0.10.1/9 which is inside the LAN subnet and also huge.
      Try using, for example, 10.0.1.1/24 for LAN and 10.0.2.1/24 for OPT1.

      Once you have doen that you'll find you have no access from the OPT1 subnet. Only the LAN interface is 'ready to go' by default. You need to enable DHCP on OPT1 in Services: DHCP Server: and then add firewall rules to allow out traffic in Firewall: Rules: OPT1: Check the LAN rules for inspiration.

      When you said you had a fibre connection I was imagining +100Mbps. Your P4 should have no problems with 18Mbps.

      Is your WAN using PPPoE from the pfSense box?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • F
        flipflop1970
        last edited by

        Thank you Stephen, that bit of subnet info worked a treat  :D

        Within half an hour of me posting I realised exactly what I had done wrong, but couldn't work out the best way to correct it, but as soon as I read your reply, I was on it.

        Initially, I could only access internet on the LAN based network, the OPT1 was blocking internet access, but I realised that the firewall was not set up, effectively blocking the internet. I have set the rules as per the rules that are automatically applied LAN, but I dare say that I am going to have apply more rules to both LAN and OPT1, but just or the moment I'm leaving everything as is for a few days just to test the system.
        I haven't set traffic shaping yet either.

        It does appear to have improved the QoS already, even though I haven't set traffic shaping yet.

        One more question that I have, is regarding my fallback service. If the pfsense box should fail, then I will be reconnecting to the previous network. The router for this is still in situ and transmitting SSID even though it doesn't have a wan connection and all of our devices are now connected to the new networks. All devices still have the settings saved for this network, so it's just a case of selecting the network and connecting, but obviously the router will not be connected to the modem, this will have to be done manually, but is there a device that I can connect the incoming wan from the modem to, that will automatically detect that my preferred router (pfsense) is not working, and route the wan to the back up router?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          The correct way to do this, if you need this sort of uptime, is to use a pair of pfSense boxes in a CARP setup.
          https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Configuring_pfSense_Hardware_Redundancy_(CARP)
          That's probably beyond what you're looking for!

          It is possible to do what you're describing by using a LAN-bypass NIC. The NIC has two Ethernet ports that usually appear as two separate interfaces to pfSense but if the power fails the ports connect together bypassing the pfSense box. It can also be configured to go into bypass mode if the OS crashes using a watchdog timer but that requires some interaction with the OS.
          Generally speaking bypass cards are more trouble than they're worth. If you search the forum you'll just find people trying to disable the by-pass mode.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            flipflop1970
            last edited by

            Hmmm, maybe I will just leave as is, and manually reconnect the wan, doesn't seem worth the hassle lol.
            Oh well, now it's time for me start thinking about firewall rules… see how many hurdles I have to jump this time haha

            Just want to say a big thanks for your prompt replies, your information has been very helpful  ;)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              flipflop1970
              last edited by

              I was just re-reading this thread, and noticed this question that you asked me:

              @stephenw10:

              Is your WAN using PPPoE from the pfSense box?

              Steve

              Sorry, I don't know how I missed it  :-[

              Anyhow, no, the WAN is using DHCP as I was under the impression that this is the protocol used by talktalk. If anybody can prove me wrong please let me know. However, I have not had any issues so far.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                If the two choices are DHCP and PPPoE and one side is incorrect the link won't come up at all.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  It was the wrong question anyway. What I should have asked was, does your pfSense WAN interface have a public IP? In other words is your modem acting as just a modem or is it routing and NATing which is much less desirable.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    flipflop1970
                    last edited by

                    Hi Steve,

                    In all honesty, I don't know, how would I find this out?

                    Thanks

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      Look at the IPv4 address for WAN in status->interfaces.  Go to a web page like www.wimi.com.  Are the addresses the same?

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • F
                        flipflop1970
                        last edited by

                        @Derelict:

                        Look at the IPv4 address for WAN in status->interfaces.  Go to a web page like www.wimi.com.  Are the addresses the same?

                        Yes, the addresses do match.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          That's fine then. I was originally asking because it may have conflicted with the LAN subnet but that's not the case.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            flipflop1970
                            last edited by

                            That's great, thanks guys  ;)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.