Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SOLVED Traffic on WAN interface only

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    17 Posts 4 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      G.D. Wusser Esq.
      last edited by

      Ok, I am stupid, LOL. I was just too quickly changing between the interfaces on the Traffic Graph. It takes a while for it to start showing the data.

      However I still cannot account for about half of the outgoing traffic on one of the internal interfaces. No Squid on this install.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        G.D. Wusser Esq.
        last edited by

        Another strange thing. Despite creating A WAN rule blocking by IP address. A very small percentage of UDP packets still come through. The packets are incoming from the Internet, and the IP is most likely spoofed.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          State not cleared from the firewall?

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            G.D. Wusser Esq.
            last edited by

            UDP - no state. Most of the packets get blocked, just a few single ones get through…

            I am going to restart the box for good measure, and test again, though.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Ha! good point.  ::)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                G.D. Wusser Esq.
                last edited by

                I rebooted the pfSense and the packet leak has stopped. Hmmm…

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kejianshi
                  last edited by

                  I'd be looking for malware on my network.  I doubt seriously its a pfsense problem.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    G.D. Wusser Esq.
                    last edited by

                    It is smells like a reflected attack, not amplified though, since the packets in and out are the same size. I stopped the attack at the firewall level.

                    I think there is an issue with pfSense traffic graph, the traffic does not add up. I think it shows exactly double outgoing the traffic for local interfaces. I am still investigating, this will take more time to accumulate the data from different network segments and add it all up.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      G.D. Wusser Esq.
                      last edited by

                      Found this: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=67295.0

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Check the forum. There are a number of threads about double counting on the traffic graphs. I've never seen it though, it seems to happen only under specific conditions.

                        Ah, typed too slow! Yep that's one of them.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kejianshi
                          last edited by

                          Yep - Sometimes pfsense reports traffic bandwidthh incorrectly, which is much less troubling than having a bunch of phantom traffic.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            G.D. Wusser Esq.
                            last edited by

                            Thanks for your help everybody. This was a compound issue, and it looks like everything has been explained now. I appreciate the help.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.