Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.1.5 -> 2.2 Printer is not working

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.2 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    17 Posts 7 Posters 4.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • w0wW
      w0w
      last edited by

      Ok, I have downloaded and configured to load ulpt.ko from 10.0 release. Printer is now detected. Updated CUPS, CUPS is running, but not printing, this should be CUPS issue that not this thread problem.
      I request to include the ulpt back into pfsense kernel if it possible.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        I can't remember too many times when I need a printer attached to my firewall.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • w0wW
          w0w
          last edited by

          Is there any reason not to do it? :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            I'm not sure if running a samba share there is a security issue or not.  I'd have to let people test it to death.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H
              heper
              last edited by

              @kejianshi:

              I'm not sure if running a samba share there is a security issue or not.  I'd have to let people test it to death.

              everything you add to a firewall is a potential additional attack target where you'd need to keep up with the security advisories /updates / ….
              every addon package pfsense has a risk of being less secure then a "stock" bsd release.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                charliem
                last edited by

                @kejianshi:

                I'm not sure if running a samba share there is a security issue or not.  I'd have to let people test it to death.

                Samba?  Not sure what that has to do with CUPS.  I agree it's poor form to 'accessorize' your firewall, but not everyone has the luxury of that, or some may prefer to learn from personal experience.

                The question of including the ulpt module has come up before: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=78498.msg428605#msg428605 but I guess it never went any further.  Including it as a loadable module would seem to be a pretty low risk.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • w0wW
                  w0w
                  last edited by

                  I don't see any risks if ulpt is compiled into kernel also, I don't ask you to compile CUPS or samba-tumba into kernel. What risks could be caused by ulpt, theoretically? If you don't connect any printer it is not executing any code. Including module instead of compiling into, would be great also for paranoids.  ;D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • w0wW
                    w0w
                    last edited by

                    https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4108

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cmb
                      last edited by

                      @w0w:

                      https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4108

                      No. It's a firewall, not a print server.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • w0wW
                        w0w
                        last edited by

                        I did not asked you to compile a print server into pfsense is not it? :) And a print server is not the same as usb printer driver support, not even close.
                        If you just will add ulpt.ko module into pfsense distribution, this is not changing the main concept and do not adding any security holes if firewall user itself don't bring them up. But as I answered on bug tracker… No means no.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.