Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    GRE Passtrough AND Outbound VPN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    10 Posts 2 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      GrafGirula
      last edited by

      Hi.
      I have a problem with the passthrough to a PPTP server.

      In my network is a PPTP server that accepts connections from outside. Therefore I have two NAT forwardings (1723 / TCP and GRE) configured to this server. Of course, there are two matching firewall rules.

      Establishing a connection from a client in my network to a remote PPTP server fails. Only when I set a GRE forwarding to the client, the connection is established.
      Because there can't be configured two GRE NAT rules at the same time, only an "either-or mode" is possible.

      In the Firewall logs I found that the external PPTP server wants to establish a GRE connection to the internal PPTP server (not my client) if I want to connect to external PTPP server from the client while the NAT rule for internal PPTP server is set.

      What do I need to adjust so I can use the inbound and outbound VPN connection at the same time?

      The pfSense 2.1.5 is connected to a modem in bridge mode. No NAT-cascade.

      Many thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        GRE is weird…

        I haven't had great success with:

        Using a PPTP client on the same network as PPTP server.

        Or having multiple clients on same network connect to a single PPTP server.

        Its always been flakey for me.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          GrafGirula
          last edited by

          The same scenario works with a CISCO RV042. Why not with pfSense?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            With me it wasn't reliable even before I switched to pfsense.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              GrafGirula
              last edited by

              Maybe it's possible to find a workaround?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kejianshi
                last edited by

                There is a work around.  Switch to openvpn.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  GrafGirula
                  last edited by

                  I would if I could.  :D

                  …it's the decision of our customers.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kejianshi
                    last edited by

                    Do your customers know that using PPTP encrypted VPN is virtually same as passing traffic with no encryption at all?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      GrafGirula
                      last edited by

                      I think so. And I hope that they will find the right way soon.
                      But I need to ensure that the service VPN tunnel work again as soon as possible.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        GrafGirula
                        last edited by

                        Does pfSense have any tools to find a solution?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.