FreeNAS experiences? Is it something?
-
@Phishfry:
I actually prefer UFS. That is all I use with Nas4Free. Serves me well. I don't need the extra overhead ZFS brings. Seems like the zfs.ko module takes forever to load –even if if not using ZFS filesystem... And how about recoveries like Jason is saying. I have had problems as well but with DragonflyBSD could mount my UFS drives on another machine no problem
Thank you for the reply too ;D
To you I ask the same question I asked Jason in the above: how do you cope with these problems that ZFS is supposed to solve?
ZFS on Linux appears not to be recommended.
-
I spent some time looking at the FreeNas, UnRaid, etc options and settled on just paying for a FlexRaid license. It's platform independent, has a good GUI, can be set-and-forget. Had all the features I wanted, and appeared that it would take a lot less time to learn and configure - which made it worth the price. I've had a few drive failures in the past 4 years I've been using it, the system stayed up until replacements arrived, and restored to the new drives with just a few clicks.
-
I spent some time looking at the FreeNas, UnRaid, etc options and settled on just paying for a FlexRaid license. It's platform independent, has a good GUI, can be set-and-forget. Had all the features I wanted, and appeared that it would take a lot less time to learn and configure - which made it worth the price. I've had a few drive failures in the past 4 years I've been using it, the system stayed up until replacements arrived, and restored to the new drives with just a few clicks.
Thanks ;D
As I just happen to have been diving deeply into all the different tasts, one of my bookmarks was this:
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/26-home-theater-computers/1438027-mfusick-s-how-build-affordable-30tb-flexraid-media-server-information-requested.html
User 'Puwaha' states things.
-
I'm happily using FreeNAS at home. 4 x 4TB in RAIDZ2.
Time Machine backup destination for everyone and other AFP serving.
iSCSI backend and NFS ISO repository for XenServer
iTunes server
Some colo cabinets using it for off-site backup using rsync over ssh.
iSCSI drive to my workstation
tftp server
etcWhen I first installed it I used Seagates and RAIDZ1. Three out of the four drives failed within a year. No data lost. Scary times rebuilding (resilvering) a drive with no parity. I got lucky.
I replaced them with WD Reds and haven't had a problem since.
I looked at NAS4Free a couple years ago and at the time decided to go with FreeNAS. I can't remember why.
-
FreeNAS is now a big piece of crap.
As of 9.3 they have implemented an auto update system. So they can continuously update it. So it is no longer like an appliance and more like running windows.
So why don't I just run Windows server and save myself the trouble?A storage appliance is supposed to have very long uptimes. You're not going to have that with FreeNAS. Additionally, unless you purchase support, the forum members will treat you like absolute crap. Which is not something you need when a problem suddenly arises.
-
I'd rather have the auto-update system than what we had before, which was "yes there's a problem but wait until the next release to get it fixed."
As with any updates you can apply - or not.
I don't think it is enterprise ready - without supported HA how can it be - but it does everything I ask of it.
-
As of 9.3 they have implemented an auto update system. So they can continuously update it. So it is no longer like an appliance and more like running windows. So why don't I just run Windows server and save myself the trouble? A storage appliance is supposed to have very long uptimes. You're not going to have that with FreeNAS.
Additionally, unless you purchase support, the forum members will treat you like absolute crap. Which is not something you need when a problem suddenly arises.
This I've noticed too by browsing the threads. Which really makes me wonder what their target market is supposed to be, and if they'd even carefully thought about that first. You don't get customers by bullying them or letting them be bullied, and if you don't answer questions as admins but instead reply with 'have you figured it out yourself already? Can you post it here' then I'm afraid you don't understand things too well. Perhaps they should dive back in history and see how first Wordperfect and next MS Word got their markets(…). Or they should visit this fine place to get some examples :)
I'd rather have the auto-update system than what we had before, which was "yes there's a problem but wait until the next release to get it fixed." As with any updates you can apply - or not.
Agreed.
I don't think it is enterprise ready - without supported HA how can it be - but it does everything I ask of it.
I'm afraid you are right. Which makes it a serious problem for me, as I do want to move away from Synology. I don't need to many Enterprise features, but one I do need: rock solid and stable, and proper support/documentation. And I'm afraid that also isn't in place currently.
I'm still wondering what their target market is, and if they ever did a SWOT - the right SWOT ;D
-
Ive been running it for 6-8months having migrated from a Areca 24 * 1TB array running under Win7 Enterprise.
Running Xeon e5 processor, 32GB RAM and 10 4TB drives in RAIDZ2. Its been up running error free for about 4 months since my last upgrade to the latest 9.2.x version. I haven't made the leap to 9.3 until things settle down. I need stability, not cutting edge features sets. Performance over 10gbe networking is in the region of 450MB/s read & write. I had hoped for slightly more but TBH this is fine.
Generally been a decent experience, ZFS itself is cool for its data integrity and I sleep better at night for it.
FreeNAS is not something you can do 'cheaply' with bargain basic hardware, it likes lots of RAM and needs ECC RAM and a suitable CPU/motherboard obviously.
The guys at FreeNAS forums are rather tetchy with people who don't make an attempt to read the manuals or follow the basic how-to's. Assuming you don't try and cut corners, do things right they are generally a supportive bunch admittedly with a off sense of humour at times.
Its easy enough to spin up a VM to have a play about with the interface and create/destroy some arrays - get a feel for its nuances before you migrate critical data to it for sure. -
-
FreeNAS lives at the pleasure of REFS and BTRFS. When those two mature, and they will, FreeNAS will go the way of the DoDo.
ZFS will live on if someone comes along and makes a great open source appliance focused on massive uptimes.
Thanks ;D
From quick-reading BTRFS it seems this is the same as ZFS, but then native for Linux (?)
-
You can get ZFS on Linux, just not along with Linux due to licence issues:
http://zfsonlinux.org/
http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue
ZFS is licensed under the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), and the Linux kernel is licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 2 (GPLv2). While both are free open source licenses they are restrictive licenses. The combination of them causes problems because it prevents using pieces of code exclusively available under one license with pieces of code exclusively available under the other in the same binary. In the case of the kernel, this prevents us from distributing ZFS as part of the kernel binary. However, there is nothing in either license that prevents distributing it in the form of a binary module or in the form of source code.
Comparing them is beyond me and I've decided to reset the OpenSuse defaults and stick to Ext4 rather than the recommended BTRFS / XFS and sit it out until 13.3.
Lots of good reading if you do a Google versus search.
https://rudd-o.com/linux-and-free-software/ways-in-which-zfs-is-better-than-btrfs
