Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Varying ISP speeds

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    10 Posts 3 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      wiz561
      last edited by

      Hi!

      I'm running the HFSC traffic shaper and set the top speeds to 55/10, which is what my Internet should be running at.  For the past few days, my cable modem speeds will drop down to 25/4-ish at night, due to everybody and their brother probably streaming.  When this happens, my QoS is messed up because it doesn't know that my top speeds drop.

      Is there a way that I can tell pfsense that the top speed of my internet is lower, so please adjust the queues as necessary to accommodate this lower speed?

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        From what I have read, you should set your HFSC speeds to 90-95% of the lowest speed that you get from your ISP.  That said, unless you really need the specific features of HFSC, you might be better off using PRIQ.  No worries about bandwidth settings with that shaper.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          wiz561
          last edited by

          Thanks for the response.  When I was setting it up, it sounded like HFSC was the newer technology, but PRIQ was easier to setup.  It took awhile to get it right with HFSC, but it works well when my cable modem speeds are the 55/10.

          I'll have to look into PRIQ more.  I think I tried that first and it wasn't working as expected, so that's why I went with HFSC.  That, and the newer technology of HFSC (from what I can remember).

          Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KOMK
            KOM
            last edited by

            PRIQ is stupid simple compared to HFSC.  I don't see how it wouldn't work for you.  Higher priority queues get preference regardless of everything else.  HFSC is sexy and cool, but it takes a lot more work to figure out and the benefits may not even be applicable to you, depending on your network traffic patterns.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              wiz561
              last edited by

              Quick question.  If PRIQ doesn't care about speeds, then why does the wizard ask you your connection upload/download?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • KOMK
                KOM
                last edited by

                Because the GUI is one size, fits all.  You can put values there is you like but they are ignored by PRIQ and CBQ.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  wiz561
                  last edited by

                  @KOM:

                  Because the GUI is one size, fits all.  You can put values there is you like but they are ignored by PRIQ and CBQ.

                  Oh.  OK.  :)  I guess that is where I was kind of getting confused.  I'm going to try to backup my configs and switch over to PRIQ.  :)

                  Thank you for the quick responses and information!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KOMK
                    KOM
                    last edited by

                    You can use Diagnostics - Backup/Restore to backup just your Traffic Shaper config.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      Harvy66
                      last edited by

                      PRIQ will work "better" in this case because it uses strict priority and that benefit you will get. You can still have issues with buffer bloat since PRIQ still won't know to limit your bandwidth, but having your packets at least ordered can help.

                      This will only help with upload. Since you're receiving less than what you're attempting to shape, the shaper will effectively be moot. All buffering is happening before the traffic shaper on download. At least in the case of your upload, the prioritization is happening before the buffering.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wiz561
                        last edited by

                        Thanks all for the responses.  I switched over to PRIQ but I'm having issues where it's not playing nice with the priority.    I hate to be one of those people who asks yet another 'why isn't it working' question, but I"m going to be because it's driving me up the wall.

                        I'm going to create another topic though since it wasn't the intent of hte original posting.

                        Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.