Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Gateway and interface widget weirdness firefox?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.2 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    17 Posts 5 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      doktornotor Banned
      last edited by

      @johnpoz:

      The not able to delete gateway or edit widget not to display a gateway maybe should be in own thread.

      Apparently, there's already a bug about this. It's not just the widget, also lots of pointless noise logged. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4102

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        I am not seeing any of that log stuff listed there.. Maybe because I marked it down and disabled monitoring, etc..?

        I can understand the creation of the gateways when you assign the gif to a opt, but you should be able to delete it.  Or atleast remove it from the widget.  Why should something be listed on the widget that is not in use..

        Makes it look like something is broken showing unknown, etc.

        turnedoff.png
        turnedoff.png_thumb

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          phil.davis
          last edited by

          I added just a dumb gateway to nowhere across on of my test LANs. It shows in the widget as offline - good. Then I set it to Disabled, go back to the widget and it is not shown. So the Gateways widget already does not display diabled gateway.
          But yes, sometimes there can be gateways that are rubbish for your configuration, or that are simply backup or test things, and that you do not want to display on the dashboard because they are normally down. It would be handy to be able to choose not to display some gateways.
          For me, the same option to choose what not to display would be good in:
          Interfaces widget
          Interface Statistics widget
          Dyn DNS Status widget
          OpenVPN widget

          When I feel like I care enough, I might even code it ;)

          As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
          If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            doktornotor Banned
            last edited by

            @phil.davis:

            I added just a dumb gateway to nowhere across on of my test LANs. It shows in the widget as offline - good. Then I set it to Disabled, go back to the widget and it is not shown. So the Gateways widget already does not display diabled gateway.

            @Phil: This does not apply to these bogus dynamic GWs. When I set those to Disable this gateway - Disable Gateway Monitoring - Mark Gateway as Down - those still show in widget as ~ ~ Unknown

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              ^ Exactly - create a gif, you can not get rid of the v4 it creates.. Nor can you delete it.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                phil.davis
                last edited by

                The general code to return a list of gateways (without disabled gateways) had problems processing a gateway that is dynamic but also disabled.
                The pull request fixes it for all the cases I could think of to test:
                https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/1433

                As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Sweet..  So should prob be in the next snap?

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    phil.davis
                    last edited by

                    That depends when it gets reviewed and committed. It would be good if you guys can test, since you have real systems that use IPv6 and do not want the IPv4 dynamic gateway and…
                    It would be good to know that this does not cause issues deeper down, where a disabled IPv4 gateway will no longer be seen by some underlying code that applies rules...
                    It is just /etc/inc/gwlb.inc - it is easy enough to put that from the pull request onto a test system.

                    As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                    If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cmb
                      last edited by

                      I just merged that, it'll be in the first snapshot from the 12th (not the one that's being built right now).

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by

                        I will update to the whatever the newest snap is in the morning and let you know.  So far really like the stuff I am seeing in 2.2, like that the vmx3 drivers are there and no need for vmtools to get those working.. Just added the open tools so I can shut it down from esxi, etc. That is working from what I have tested.

                        Have not played with too much yet, but everything sofar that I was doing is working - other than vnstat2 seems broken, but have not had chance to look into it yet. Did notice some threads, etc.  But to me that is a package.. And like the resolver vs just the forwarder..  I decided to give the 64bit version a run, so I jut did a clean install and have been migrating in my settings.  My HE tunnel came up with no issues, got my /64 and my /48 working without any problems on different local segments.

                        Openvpn up and running clickity click no issues..  From what I have played with sofar looks like ready to release ;) hehehe

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eskild
                          last edited by

                          I have just tested "2.2-RC (i386) built on Mon Jan 12 21:07:08 CST 2015 ".
                          In my system, the automatically generated GIT gw "WAN6_TUNNELV4" is still visible in the widget, even if it is disabled in Routing->Gateways.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            I am running

                            2.2-RC (amd64)
                            built on Mon Jan 12 12:47:16 CST 2015

                            And its gone..  Thanks!!  Might be something in the i386 code went wrong?  Looks to be working 64bit version.  I will update to very latest here in a bit.  But got some stuff to do first.

                            edit:  Yeah updated to latest snap
                            2.2-RC (amd64)
                            built on Mon Jan 12 21:47:35 CST 2015

                            And as you can see if you disable the v4 it not on the gateway widget.  If you enable it.. Then it shows up as unknown, like in the previous attachments.

                            gwgone.png
                            gwgone.png_thumb
                            latestsnap1.png_thumb
                            latestsnap1.png

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P
                              phil.davis
                              last edited by

                              @eskild:

                              I have just tested "2.2-RC (i386) built on Mon Jan 12 21:07:08 CST 2015 ".
                              In my system, the automatically generated GIT gw "WAN6_TUNNELV4" is still visible in the widget, even if it is disabled in Routing->Gateways.

                              Well that snap should be late enough to have the fixed code, and there is nothing specific to 32-bit in this.
                              What is interesting about your configuration that might be an unusual edge case?

                              As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                              If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                eskild
                                last edited by

                                Wierd. So I deleted the GIF interface and all related config, and created it from scratch with the same values. Now it workes as expected.
                                Perfect! Thanks.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.